Category Archives: Malawi

world & Malawi National News and Headlines. – View the latest National  news and breaking news today for Malawi from maravipost.com, world, weather, entertainment, politics and health at maravipost.com

Is it progressive for Malawi to export labour including jobless nurses to Israel?

At present, a number of Malawians are employed in Israeli farms, despite concerns about the hazardous conditions caused by war. No wonder, there have been accounts of some Malawians who were initially recruited in these farms fleeing from the inhumane conditions and attempting to find better employment opportunities in Israel, only to be sent back to our country. Additionally, some experts have criticized the political motivations behind the recruitment of these Malawians in Israel.

Despite the ongoing controversies, the Malawi Government plans to send jobless nurses to Israel even though our healthcare system requires more nursing staff. At present, the ratio of nurses to patients in Malawi is 1 to 10,000, which falls far below the WHO’s recommended ratio of 1 nurse per 1,000 patients.

Supporters of labour exportation claim that individuals from Malawi who work overseas frequently send financial support to their families and communities, which can greatly enhance our economy and enhance the quality of life for many. Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that those who migrate abroad often acquire valuable skills and knowledge that can be advantageous upon their return to Malawi, aiding in the growth of domestic industries and fostering innovation.

It has been contended that Malawi will address its domestic unemployment issues by sending nurses and unskilled labourers to Israel. It is ultimately envisaged that this move will create more job opportunities for those who stay behind. Additionally, exporting labour will encourage cultural exchange between Israel and Malawi thereby strengthening their relationship and promoting diplomacy and trade.

According to certain experts, sending workers to Israel will boost Malawi’s global competitiveness by establishing a strong presence in the international market, ultimately enhancing its reputation and influence. Additionally, establishing a labour export industry in Malawi will likely result in a more diverse economy thereby reducing dependence on traditional sectors and generating fresh prospects.

The general understanding is that the need for skilled workers in Israel and other nations will motivate the Malawi government to increase its investments in education and vocational training in the country. It is also acknowledged that individuals working abroad may establish networks that will potentially result in future business prospects, collaborations, and investments in Malawi.

It is important to acknowledge that the aforementioned benefits of sending labour to Israel may potentially be outweighed by several drawbacks.

For starters, it is anticipated that certain skilled workers who have been exported from our country, such as nurses and other technocrats, will opt to stay in Israel where they can find better job opportunities. This will result in a depletion of valuable talent and knowledge in our nation. The general understanding is that the Malawi Government has already incurred significant costs in training and supporting the exported skilled workers.

Furthermore , relying on foreign labour markets may create vulnerabilities, particularly if Israel’s economy experiences fluctuations or if the political relationship between Malawi and Israel deteriorates. Clearly, this is not a sustainable approach to tackling unemployment in Malawi.

Psychologically speaking, Malawians working in Israel may encounter difficulties while trying to adjust to unfamiliar cultural surroundings in the midst of warfare. This may potentially result in misunderstandings and a decrease in their ability to fulfil their responsibilities. Moreover, families and communities back in Malawi are usually affected when workers leave for extended periods, leading to social fragmentation and emotional distress.

Sending nurses to Israel will not only result in a shortage of nurses in our hospitals, but it may also lead to the loss of important local knowledge and insights that are necessary for addressing our domestic problems. This is especially concerning since we are already in need of nurses. It does not take a renowned philosopher to recognize this potential consequence.

The decision by Chakwera government to send unskilled labour to Israel has already led to public trust, discontent and political backlash because many patriotic Malawians feel that this government is prioritizing foreign interests over our domestic needs. The impending plan of the Chakwera administration to send nurses to work in Israel attests to this.

It is highly likely exporting technocrats and professionals such as nurses will assist to stifle innovation and development in Malawi, as fewer experts will be available available to drive local projects and initiatives.

In conclusion, while the individual worker who moves out of Malawi to work abroad may reap more benefits than the country itself, it is important for the Malawi Government to devise a long-term solution to combat the issue of high unemployment in the country.

It is illogical for the Malawi Government to provide training for nurses and then not offer them employment, especially when there is a significant shortage of nurses in our healthcare system. The weak argument that the Chakwera administration will simply export unemployed nurses is baseless.

The Malawi Government needs to take action and adopt a comprehensive and all-inclusive strategy in regards to the number of graduates, ensuring that it meets the demands of both the private and public sectors.

Trump administration weighs suspension of habeas corpus, stirring constitutional concerns

WASHINGTON-(MaraviPost)-The administration of former U.S. President Donald Trump once considered a move that shocked legal scholars and civil liberties advocates alike: suspending habeas corpus, the cornerstone of American legal protection against unlawful detention.

Habeas corpus, a centuries-old legal doctrine inherited from English common law, ensures that individuals have the right to appear before a judge to contest the legality of their imprisonment.

The mere suggestion of suspending this right sparked alarm across the political and legal spectrum, as it threatened to upend one of the most fundamental guarantees of liberty in the United States Constitution.

The Trump administration’s intention to “actively look at” this possibility was disclosed by one of the president’s senior aides, though specific details regarding the proposal’s scope or the exact circumstances under which it would be applied remained unclear.

This statement was met with swift backlash from constitutional experts, who warned that such a move could undermine the very foundation of the rule of law in the United States.

The Constitution only permits the suspension of habeas corpus in cases of “rebellion or invasion,” a clause that has been interpreted narrowly throughout American history.

The most prominent example of habeas corpus suspension occurred during the American Civil War under President Abraham Lincoln, and even then, it faced considerable opposition and legal scrutiny.

Critics of the Trump administration’s exploration of this option argued that invoking such a drastic measure without meeting the constitutional threshold would constitute an abuse of executive power.

Civil liberties organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), expressed deep concern that this consideration indicated a willingness to erode checks and balances in times of political pressure.

Some speculated that the administration might have used the COVID-19 pandemic or protests against police brutality as justification, although no formal declaration was made linking either event to the proposed suspension.

Legal analysts noted that even under emergency conditions, the executive branch must act within the bounds of the Constitution and remain subject to judicial oversight.

To bypass habeas corpus without clear and present danger would set a dangerous precedent for future administrations, critics warned.

Supporters of Trump, however, defended the administration’s approach, claiming that extraordinary circumstances may necessitate extraordinary measures.

They argued that in times of national crisis, the president must have the flexibility to act decisively to maintain order and public safety.

Nonetheless, opponents cautioned that the power to detain individuals without court review is a slippery slope that could easily be abused for political purposes.

Such powers, they argued, must be constrained by law, not wielded at the discretion of one individual or administration.

The debate also reignited discussions about the balance between national security and civil liberties, a tension that has defined American political discourse especially since the September 11, 2001 attacks.

Historically, measures that expand executive authority during crises—such as the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II—have later been viewed as shameful violations of rights.

The Trump administration’s openness to exploring the suspension of habeas corpus thus raised uncomfortable historical parallels and sparked a renewed call for vigilance in protecting democratic institutions.

While the administration ultimately did not move forward with a formal suspension, the mere possibility reminded Americans of the fragility of their constitutional protections.

It also highlighted the critical role of the judiciary, the press, and civil society in checking power and upholding the rule of law.

As the U.S. continues to grapple with political polarization and challenges to democratic norms, the episode remains a cautionary tale.

It serves as a reminder that the rights enshrined in the Constitution must be defended continuously, especially during times of uncertainty.

The Trump administration’s consideration of suspending habeas corpus may be a footnote in history, but its implications will linger in legal and political debates for years to come.

Malawi Judiciary appoints Ruth Mputeni as Spokesperson

By Jones Gadama

BLANTYRE-(MaraviPost)-The Malawi Judiciary has appointed Ruth Mputeni as its new spokesperson, tasked with driving strategic communication for the institution.

Mputeni, a seasoned communications specialist, brings over 10 years of experience in journalism, communications, and public relations to her new role.

According to Judiciary Chief Registrar Innocent Nebi, Mputeni has been engaged as Chief Corporate Affairs and Public Relations Officer.

Nebi highlighted that Mputeni’s expertise will be crucial in promoting the judiciary’s commitment to openness, accountability, and meaningful public engagement.

Mputeni joins the Malawi Judiciary from her previous role at the Public Service Pension Trust Fund, where she likely honed her skills in managing communications and stakeholder engagement.

Her appointment is part of the judiciary’s efforts to enhance its communication strategy and foster stronger relationships with the public.

The Malawi Judiciary, as a branch of the government, plays a critical role in interpreting and applying the laws of Malawi to ensure equal justice under the law.

With Mputeni at the helm of its communications department, the institution is poised to improve its outreach and engagement with the public.

As Chief Corporate Affairs and Public Relations Officer, Mputeni’s responsibilities will include managing the judiciary’s public image, handling media relations, and ensuring that the institution’s messages are conveyed effectively to the public.

Her experience in journalism and public relations will be invaluable in navigating the complex landscape of media and stakeholder engagement.

Mputeni’s appointment comes at a time when the Malawi Judiciary is working to strengthen its relationships with the public and other stakeholders.

In recent years, the judiciary has taken steps to promote transparency and accountability, including educational visits to courts by students from institutions like the Malawi Institute of Legal Education and William Murray Secondary School.

The Malawi Judiciary’s efforts to enhance its communication strategy are part of a broader commitment to promoting the rule of law and ensuring access to justice for all Malawians.

With Mputeni’s expertise and experience, the institution is well-positioned to achieve its goals and build stronger relationships with the public it serves.

Chiradzulu District Faces Funding Denial: A Historic Political Shift in Malawi

By Jones Gadama

BLANTYRE-(MaraviPost)-In a significant turn of events within Malawi’s multiparty political landscape, the Chiradzulu District Council has been denied funding for the period of February to March 2025.

This unprecedented decision marks a historic first in the nation’s political history, raising eyebrows and igniting discussions about the implications of such a move on local governance and development.

The denial of funds has not only left the district’s health department grappling with financial constraints but has also sparked allegations of political sabotage, particularly from Vice President Dr. Michael Usi, who has pointed fingers at government officials for what he perceives as a deliberate attempt to undermine the district’s progress.

The backdrop to this funding denial is steeped in the complex interplay of political affiliations and support. Chiradzulu District has been known for its allegiance to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), a political entity that has faced its share of challenges and controversies in recent years.

The denial of funding is being viewed by many as a potential punitive measure against the district for its political leanings, suggesting that the government may be using financial resources as a tool to manipulate political loyalty.

This situation raises critical questions about the role of government funding in local governance and the extent to which political affiliations can influence the allocation of resources.

As the health department in Chiradzulu grapples with the ramifications of this funding denial, the impact on public health services is becoming increasingly evident. With limited financial resources, the department is struggling to maintain essential services, leading to concerns about the well-being of the local population.

Health workers are facing challenges in delivering care, and the lack of funding could exacerbate existing health issues within the community. The situation is dire, and stakeholders are voicing their concerns about the long-term implications of this funding denial on the district’s development trajectory.

The silence of the District Commissioner on this pressing issue has only added to the uncertainty surrounding the funding denial. As a key figure in local governance, the District Commissioner’s lack of response raises questions about accountability and transparency within the district administration.

Stakeholders, including community leaders and health advocates, are calling for clarity and action, urging the government to prioritize the needs of the people over political maneuvering.

The silence from the District Commissioner is seen as a failure to advocate for the community’s interests, further fueling frustrations among residents who rely on government services for their well-being.

The broader implications of this funding denial extend beyond the immediate challenges faced by the health department.

Stakeholders are increasingly concerned about the potential stalling of development projects and initiatives that are crucial for the district’s growth. Infrastructure development, education, and social services are all at risk as funding becomes scarce.

The denial of resources not only hampers current projects but also sends a chilling message to potential investors and partners who may be hesitant to engage with a district that appears to be politically marginalized.

In light of these developments, there is a growing call for the government to reassess its priorities and ensure that the needs of the people take precedence over political considerations. The situation in Chiradzulu serves as a stark reminder of the potential consequences of politicizing public resources.

As citizens, community leaders, and health advocates rally together to demand accountability and action, the hope is that the government will recognize the importance of fostering an environment where development is not hindered by political affiliations.

Vice President Dr. Michael Usi’s allegations of sabotage by government officials resonate with many who feel that the funding denial is a calculated move to undermine the district’s progress.

His statements highlight the need for a more transparent and equitable approach to resource allocation, one that prioritizes the welfare of citizens rather than political agendas. The call for unity among stakeholders is crucial in navigating this challenging landscape, as the community seeks to advocate for its rights and ensure that its needs are met.

As the situation unfolds, the eyes of the nation are on Chiradzulu District, where the intersection of politics and public service is being scrutinized like never before.

The funding denial has sparked a broader conversation about the role of government in supporting local communities and the ethical implications of using financial resources as a means of political leverage. The residents of Chiradzulu are not merely passive observers in this unfolding drama; they are active participants in a struggle for their rights and their future.

The denial of funding to the Chiradzulu District Council for February to March 2025 represents a pivotal moment in Malawi’s multiparty politics. It underscores the need for a reevaluation of how political affiliations can influence the distribution of resources and the importance of prioritizing the needs of the people.

As stakeholders continue to voice their concerns and advocate for change, the hope is that this situation will serve as a catalyst for a more equitable and just approach to governance in Malawi.

The residents of Chiradzulu deserve a government that is committed to their well-being, one that recognizes that development should not be a pawn in the political game but a fundamental right for all citizens.

Malawi FA clears Mtanthiko from sexual harassment allegations

By Shaffie A Mtambo

BLANTYRE-(MaraviPost)-The Football Association of Malawi (FAM) has released the findings of its Commission of Inquiry into allegations of sexual harassment against Daud Mtanthiko, the Head of Delegation for the Scorchers tour of South Africa.

According to FAM President Fleetwood Haiya, the commission found that while Mtanthiko was given access to the complainant’s room, there was insufficient evidence to prove sexual harassment.

The complainant, Haz Mbizi, had reportedly deleted text messages related to the incident before lodging her complaint, which limited the evidence available for investigation.

Based on the findings, FAM has concluded that Mtanthiko is “not guilty” of the allegations.

However, Mtanthiko remains suspended and will face the FAM Disciplinary Committee to answer charges related to breach of guidelines.

Additionally, FAM will await a report from the Malawi Human Rights Commission (MHRC), which is conducting an independent inquiry into the matter.

UK troop deployments on EU Missions spark fears of backdoor entry into EU Army

LONDON-(MaraviPost)-The United Kingdom may soon find itself contributing soldiers to European Union military operations, as Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government negotiates a landmark defence and security partnership with Brussels.

According to a leaked classified memo, British troops could be deployed on EU military and civilian missions as a condition for accessing the bloc’s ambitious £127 billion Security Action for Europe (Safe) rearmament fund.

This potential development has ignited a wave of criticism, with opponents warning that it could mark a significant step toward re-integrating Britain into the EU’s defence framework—something they describe as a “backdoor” route into an EU Army.

The confidential document, seen by The Telegraph, reveals that under the terms of the draft agreement, the UK would be invited to participate in EU-led missions and operations.

While the partnership would not legally bind Britain to every EU military decision, it would open the door for British forces to be called upon in regions like Somalia or the Central African Republic, where the EU has historically deployed troops as part of its Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP).

The agreement is expected to be a central agenda item at the upcoming UK-EU summit in London scheduled for May 19.

The proposed pact, reportedly spearheaded by the EU’s foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, outlines that non-EU countries must establish a formal security and defence partnership to be eligible for participation in the Safe fund.

This scheme aims to boost Europe’s military capabilities by pooling resources from EU member states and third-party partners, enabling the procurement of advanced weaponry and defence equipment.

For the UK, inclusion in this programme would be a boon to the domestic defence industry, allowing companies like BAE Systems to compete for lucrative contracts across the continent.

However, the deal comes at a cost.

One particularly controversial clause would see the UK surrender access to its sovereign fishing waters for at least three years, granting EU fishing fleets rights previously curtailed by Brexit.

This concession has reignited the long-simmering debate over control of British waters—an issue that played a pivotal role in the 2016 referendum campaign.

Foreign Secretary David Lammy, speaking from Poland while attending meetings with EU counterparts, confirmed that discussions on the UK-EU Defence Security Partnership are ongoing.

“We’re pleased that we are now negotiating with our friends in Europe,” he said.

“The UK will consider its participation in the EU CSDP civilian missions and military operations and missions, upon the invitation of the EU.”

Critics argue that Starmer’s Labour government is effectively reversing core tenets of Brexit by aligning too closely with Brussels on foreign and defence policy.

Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, was among those quick to condemn the move, branding it “a betrayal of British sovereignty” and accusing Starmer of attempting to stitch the UK back into EU structures without public consent.

“Two-tier Keir has sold Britain out again,” Farage said in a video statement.

“We voted to take back control, not to hand our troops over to Brussels.”

Proponents of the deal, however, maintain that in a rapidly changing global security environment, international cooperation is essential.

With conflicts in Ukraine, the Middle East, and potential escalations involving NATO, the UK cannot afford to operate in isolation.

Supporters believe the partnership would strengthen Europe’s collective security, provide economic benefits for British defence firms, and help restore post-Brexit diplomatic relations with the continent.

Still, concerns remain about the democratic oversight of such deployments.

The EU has historically struggled to mobilise its battlegroups due to the requirement of unanimous approval from member states.

Critics fear that, despite this safeguard, Britain could be drawn into foreign conflicts without sufficient parliamentary scrutiny or public debate.

The timing of the negotiations is also politically sensitive.

With a general election looming in the UK and pressure mounting over national defence spending, Starmer’s government is walking a tightrope.

On one hand, it must show a commitment to strengthening the UK’s global standing; on the other, it must reassure Brexit voters that it is not undoing the referendum’s outcome.

The leaked memo and the surrounding controversy have also reignited calls for greater transparency in post-Brexit negotiations.

Many analysts point out that deals of such magnitude should not be confined to closed-door discussions but brought before Parliament for open debate.

They argue that military commitments, especially those that may place British troops in harm’s way, require full democratic accountability.

Furthermore, the inclusion of the fishing rights concession has angered coastal communities and fishing associations that were promised full control over British waters post-Brexit.

“This is an insult to British fishermen,” said one industry representative.

“We were sold a vision of sovereignty, and now we’re handing our waters back in exchange for weapons contracts. It’s a slap in the face.”

As the May 19 summit approaches, the political stakes are high.

The government must balance strategic military alliances with domestic political realities.

While deeper ties with Europe may offer economic and security advantages, the optics of such a move—especially involving British troop deployments—could prove politically explosive.

The broader question raised by this unfolding situation is whether Brexit truly represented a permanent break from European integration, or merely a pause in a longer, more complex relationship.

For now, one thing is clear: Britain’s foreign and defence policy is once again being shaped not just in Westminster, but in Brussels.

Vitumbiko Mumba

Tensions Rise in MCP as Vitumbiko Mumba Cries Foul Over Primary Elections

By Jones Gadama

The Malawi Congress Party (MCP) is facing internal strife in the Mzimba Central constituency, where National Executive Committee member Vitumbiko Mumba has accused the party leadership of manipulating the electoral college for the upcoming primary elections.

In a strongly worded letter to MCP Secretary General Richard Chimwendo Banda, Mumba alleged that the electoral college developed by the regional chairman includes individuals who are not MCP members, while some long-serving area chairpersons have been inexplicably excluded.

Mumba believes that this manipulation is a deliberate attempt to undermine his candidacy and potentially force him to contest as an independent candidate.

This, he argues, would ultimately lead to his removal from the National Executive Committee. The allegations have sparked tension within the party, with Mumba calling for immediate intervention to ensure a fair and transparent electoral process.

However, not all aspirants in the constituency share Mumba’s concerns. Councillor Paul Chondo of Euthini Ward claims that all six aspirants, except Adamson Kuseli Mkandawire, have agreed to the Electoral College that the Constituency Committee proposed.

This disagreement highlights the deepening divisions within the party and raises questions about the legitimacy of the electoral process.

The MCP has faced challenges in its primary elections, with allegations of electoral irregularities and favoritism.

In some constituencies, cabinet ministers and parliamentarians have been accused of rigging their way into the elections, potentially paving the way for independent candidates to win in the general elections.

The party’s stronghold in districts like Kasungu, Dowa, and Ntchisi has been tested by internal conflicts and allegations of manipulation.

The allegations against the electoral college in Mzimba Central constituency are serious and warrant a thorough investigation. If proven true, they could undermine the legitimacy of the primary elections and damage the party’s reputation.

The MCP leadership must prioritize the integrity of the electoral process and ensure that it is free, fair, and transparent.

As the party navigates these challenges, the leadership must demonstrate its commitment to democratic principles and fairness in its primary elections. With the 16th September 2025 elections looming, the MCP must work to restore trust among its members and the public.

The party’s Secretary General, Richard Chimwendo Banda, has yet to comment on the allegations, but the party’s leadership will be under pressure to address these concerns and ensure that the primary elections reflect the will of the members.

The MCP’s primary elections are a critical test of the party’s commitment to democracy and fairness.

The party’s leadership must take these allegations seriously and work to ensure that the electoral process is transparent, fair, and free from manipulation. Only then can the party hope to regain the trust of its members and the public.

The MCP primary elections in Mzimba Central constituency have been marred by allegations of manipulation, highlighting the need for transparency and fairness in the electoral process.

The party’s leadership must take these allegations seriously and work to restore trust among its members.

The integrity of the electoral process is paramount, and the MCP must demonstrate its commitment to democratic principles and fairness in its primary elections.

Environmental groupings gang against Presidential Pardon of convicted wildlife trafficker Lin Yun Hua

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)–A coalition of environmental civil society organizations (CSOs), led by the Coordination Union for the Rehabilitation of the Environment (CURE)—the sector technical lead under the Council for Non-Governmental Organisations in Malawi—has strongly condemned President Lazarus Chakwera’s decision to pardon convicted wildlife trafficker Lin Yun Hua.

The move has been described as a major setback in Malawi’s ongoing fight against wildlife crimes.

The outcry follows a lack of transparency surrounding the controversial decision to pardon and reduce Lin Yun Hua’s prison sentence through the Presidential Advisory Committee on the Granting of Pardons.

Speaking during a media briefing in Lilongwe on Friday, May 9, environmental activist and CURE Executive Director Charles Mkoka flanked by other activists namely: Mathews Malata, Mala Kayira, and Chifundo Dalireni called the decision deeply regrettable and a betrayal of the progress Malawi has made in combating illegal wildlife crime.

“This is not just a legal matter; it is a moral and national issue. Releasing a convicted wildlife criminal—found guilty of possessing protected species under the National Parks and Wildlife Act—sends the wrong message to both the public and our international partners,” Mkoka said.

He further stated that the pardon undermines Malawi’s commitment to protecting its natural resources, especially given that Lin was found in possession of specimens believed to have originated from the endangered Black Rhinoceros population in Liwonde National Park.

The Black Rhinoceroses species part of the big five got extinct in Malawi, as the last one was shot by poachers in Mwabvi Wildlife Reserve in 1990. They were later re-introduced in 1994 to Liwonde National Park from South Africa thanks to the support from the J and B circle.

The coalition of CSOs warned that such presidential pardons threaten to reverse hard-won conservation gains, demoralize law enforcement officers, and hinder national efforts under the agriculture, tourism, and mining strategy. It also jeopardizes progress toward Malawi’s Vision 2063.

The CSOs called on the government to prioritize environmental justice and uphold the rule of law without fear or favor. They urged authorities to treat wildlife crimes with the same seriousness as crimes like rape and corruption.

“The fight against wildlife crime requires unwavering commitment at all levels of leadership. We expect our President to lead by example,” Mkoka added.

The CSOs also reminded President Chakwera of his October 19, 2020, promise made during the State House Weekly Brief then, where he committed to forming a taskforce of environmental experts to ensure violators of environmental laws receive deterrent sentences.

The event—organized by CURE in its role as sector technical lead—was supported by the Movement for Environmental Action, Civil Society Network on Climate Change National Youth Network on Climate Change, the Centre for Environmental Policy and Advocacy, Youth and Society, and the Association of Environmental Journalists, Wildlife and Environmental Society of Malawi .

It aimed to raise public awareness of the illegal wildlife trade and advocate for accountability and transparency in environmental governance inline with access to information law.

Lin Yun Hua, a Chinese national and alleged kingpin of a major wildlife trafficking syndicate, was convicted in 2021 for possession of over 103 specimens of rhino horn and other protected species, in violation of the National Parks and Wildlife Act and the UN Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). He was also convicted under the Financial Crimes Act for money laundering.

2026 Under 20 women’s World cup qualifier: Fans to watch Malawi vs CAR for free

By Edwin Mbewe


LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-Football Association of Malawi (FAM) has communicated that Sunday’s match between Malawi and Central Africa Republic in the 2026 Women’s under 20 world cup qualifier to be played at Bingu National Stadium in Lilongwe will be free of charge.

The body’s marketing and broadcasting manager Tulipo Mwenelupembe said the idea is aimed at ensuring fans to come in large numbers to support their team.

He stated, “The FIFA Under-20 Women’s Football World Cup is a developmental tournament and we decided to make entry free to promote the development of girls’ football”

Mwenelupembe told the Nation that Malawi has assembled a squad of raw talent that is set to take over from the senior side in the near future and team needs full support.

“We also want the fans to appreciate the talent we have identified in Women’s football and also give the girls a push to qualify for the next round”, he said.

Mwenelupemne however said, the free entry only applies to the normal stands.

“VIP and corporate box will not be free entry to control the capacity since there is very limited space”, he said.

Leticia Chinyamula who also plays for the Scorchers, said the players are ready for the for the battle.

Four teams from Confederation of African Football (CAF) will qualify for the finals to be held in Poland in 2026.

Malawi and other 37 countries entered the the qualifying rounds and the draw was held in 2024 with the first leg set for May 11 while the return legs are set for May 18.

Twelve lowest-ranked teams, based on previous Under-20 Women’s World Cup qualifiers performance, are battling it out in the first round.

The six winners will advance to join the 26 top-ranked teams exempted from the first round to battle it out for 16 spots.

In the third round, the remaining 16 teams will compete in the knockout format to determine the eight teams advancing to the final round.

Four winners from the final round will book a place at the finals.

WHO and Medicines Patent Pool announce sublicensing agreement for rapid diagnostic test technology

WHO and Medicines Patent Pool announce sublicensing agreement for rapid diagnostic test technology

The World Health Organization (WHO) and Medicines Patent Pool (MPP) have today announced a sublicensing agreement between MPP and a Nigerian health technology company – Codix Bio – to start development and manufacturing of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) using technology transferred from global in-vitro diagnostics company – SD Biosensor (SDB). This agreement will contribute to advancing equitable access to vital diagnostic tools through local production, expanding manufacturing capacity in the African Region.

The new RDT technology is especially useful for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), as it is easy to use in health facilities without requiring additional equipment. Tests are highly sensitive and can generate results within 20 minutes. Codix Bio will initially focus on producing RDTs for HIV, but the technology can also be used for manufacturing tests for malaria and syphilis, among others. It can also be quickly adapted to other diseases, which will prove valuable during health emergencies and pandemics, contributing to improvements in health security and equity.

“Sublicensing SDB’s RDT technology marks a major milestone in strengthening manufacturing capabilities in regions where they are needed most,” said Dr Yukiko Nakatani, WHO Assistant Director-General, Access to Medicines and Health Products. “It can help advance global commitments made at the 2023 World Health Assembly to promote equitable access to diagnostics as a cornerstone of universal health coverage and pandemic preparedness.”

“We are delighted to have signed this first sublicense agreement for RDTs with Codix Bio. Today marks a major step forward in diversifying diagnostic production and ensuring access where it is needed most,” said Charles Gore, Executive Director of the Medicines Patent Pool. “It shows how voluntary licensing and coordinated technology transfer can empower manufacturers in LMICs, ultimately helping reshape global supply chains to become more equitable and resilient.”

A new beginning for HTAP

This agreement is the first to come out of a non-exclusive, transparent license between SDB and MPP, which was agreed in December 2023 under the auspices of the WHO COVID-19 Technology Access Pool (C-TAP) initiative. C-TAP has since evolved as HTAP – the Health Technology Access Programme, with the goal of reducing the access gap in underserved regions and countries by empowering capable local producers of health products (tests, vaccines, treatments and medical devices) through sublicensing, technology and know-how transfer.

“The announcement of this sublicensing agreement with Codix Bio marks an important milestone in our partnership with WHO and MPP. By coupling the technology transfer with coordinated support, this initiative not only helps Codix Bio respond to health priorities in Nigeria and the region – it also demonstrates a collaborative model for building sustainable and self-reliant local manufacturing capacity,” said Hyo-Keun Lee, Vice Chairman of SD Biosensor, Inc. “We are proud that our highly adaptable and reliable rapid diagnostic testing technology will contribute to strengthening regional manufacturing ecosystems and expanding equitable access to diagnostics.”  

After the WHO and MPP open call was announced for applications for LMIC-based manufacturers, Codix Bio was selected as the first sublicensee. “This landmark agreement is a defining moment in our journey of health-tech innovation and a breakthrough for local healthcare manufacturing in Africa. Being selected as the first sublicensee under this global initiative underscores our commitment to contribute meaningfully to pandemic preparedness and regional health security,” said Sammy Ogunjimi, Group Managing Director/CEO, Codix Group. “With support from WHO and MPP, we are committed to producing high-quality, rapid diagnostic tests that can transform access to timely diagnosis, not just in Nigeria, but across the continent.”

HTAP will coordinate support from across WHO and its partners, covering areas such as workforce development, regulatory compliance and product uptake. It is also continuing with evaluations for a potential second sublicensee for this technology transfer.

Most LMICs rely on importing health diagnostics. Following fragility and heavy dependence on imported health product supplies during the COVID-19 pandemic and important lessons learnt for regional health security, there is growing momentum for improving local production and supply resilience, including by institutions such as the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC), the Global Fund and Unitaid.

“Africa CDC welcomes this partnership as a concrete example of what regional health security can look like. Building diagnostic manufacturing capacity within the continent improves pandemic response and helps build African health sovereignty. We are pleased to see Africa CDC’s strategic direction reflected in this initiative, and we stand ready to support its implementation through coordination and technical assistance,” said Dr Abebe Bayih, lead of the Platform for Harmonized African Health Manufacturing (PHAH).
 

Note to editors

About Medicines Patent Pool (MPP)
The Medicines Patent Pool (MPP) is a United Nations-backed public health organization working to increase access to and facilitate the development of life-saving medicines for low- and middle-income countries. Through its innovative business model, MPP partners with civil society, governments, international organizations, industry, patient groups, and other stakeholders to prioritize and license needed medicines and pool intellectual property to encourage generic manufacture and the development of new formulations. medicinespatentpool.org

About WHO
Dedicated to the well-being of all people and guided by science, the World Health Organization leads and champions global efforts to give everyone, everywhere an equal chance at a safe and healthy life. We are the UN agency for health that connects nations, partners and people on the front lines in 150+ locations – leading the world’s response to health emergencies, preventing disease, addressing the root causes of health issues and expanding access to medicines and health care. Our mission is to promote health, keep the world safe and serve the vulnerable. www.who.int

Sourced from WHO