Category Archives: Obituaries

MaraviPost : most recent significant obituaries in Malawi and those affecting the Malawi Diaspora all over the world.

Obituaries, Religion

Malawi’s SDA Pastor Shadreck Paul Zoya dies

Jones Gadama

BLANTYRE-(MaraviPost)-The Seventh-day Adventist community in Malawi is grieving the loss of one of its devoted leaders, Pastor Shadreck Paul Zoya, who passed away in the early hours of Friday, 5th September 2025, at Mlambe Hospital in Blantyre.

Pastor Zoya, who served as President of the South Malawi Conference of the Seventh-day Adventist Church from 2001 to 2005, is remembered as a man of faith, conviction, and unwavering commitment to the mission of the Church.

His death marks the end of an era for the Seventh-day Adventist Church in Malawi, where Pastor Zoya’s leadership left a profound impact on both the spiritual and organizational life of the Church.

Until his passing, he continued to serve faithfully as a chaplain for Maranatha Girls Academy, demonstrating his lifelong devotion to ministry and pastoral care.

Evangelist Dr. Enerst Kaonga, who confirmed the sad news on behalf of Back to God Media, expressed sorrow over the loss. “Pastor Zoya was a pillar of strength and a beacon of faith to many.

His dedication to the gospel and to the community will be sorely missed,” Dr. Kaonga noted.

Pastor Zoya’s legacy extends beyond his pastoral duties.

During his tenure as President of the South Malawi Conference, he took firm and controversial stands on issues that challenged the Church’s unity and doctrinal integrity.

One of the most significant and contentious episodes of his leadership was his decision to excommunicate the Bangwe Seventh-day Adventist church.

This action arose from doctrinal disagreements, notably the Bangwe SDA’s rejection of women preaching from the pulpit during divine sermons, a practice that Pastor Zoya and the broader Church leadership upheld as consistent with the Church’s fundamental beliefs.

The Bangwe SDA group, which diverged from mainstream Seventh-day Adventist teachings on this and other issues, was also critical of changes in Church symbolism.

While the Seventh-day Adventist Church transitioned from the original three-angel logo to a cross and flames logo, the Bangwe SDA condemned this change, labeling it as “heathen” and inconsistent with biblical principles.

This symbolic disagreement further deepened the rift between the two groups.

Pastor Zoya’s decision to banish and close Bangwe SDA churches was met with mixed reactions within the Church and the wider community.

Supporters viewed it as a necessary measure to protect doctrinal purity and maintain the Church’s unity.

Critics, however, saw it as a harsh stance that underscored divisions within the Adventist community in Malawi.

Despite the controversy, the Seventh-day Adventist Church has maintained its position that the Bangwe SDA group remains excommunicated.

The official Church maintains that the Bangwe’s SDA teachings and practices are not aligned with the fundamental beliefs of the denomination, even as the Bangwe SDA claims to align with the Church and continues to use similar—but distinct—logos.

Pastor Zoya’s leadership style was characterized by a firm commitment to the Church’s doctrines and an unyielding dedication to advancing the gospel message.

His tenure witnessed efforts to strengthen the Church’s spiritual foundations and outreach programs, and his pastoral care extended to nurturing new generations of believers.

The Church and the broader community remember Pastor Zoya not only for his administrative leadership but also for his spiritual guidance and personal example.

He was regarded as a servant of God who dedicated his life to ministry, leaving behind a legacy of faith, service, and courage in the face of challenges.

Burial arrangements for Pastor Zoya have yet to be announced, but the news of his passing has already inspired an outpouring of condolences from fellow clergy, Church members, and community leaders who acknowledge his contributions to Malawi’s religious landscape.

As the Seventh-day Adventist Church reflects on the life and work of Pastor Shadreck Paul Zoya, his influence remains evident in the ongoing mission and ministry of the Church in Malawi.

His leadership during a pivotal period in the Church’s history will be remembered as one marked by dedication, principle, and an enduring commitment to faith.

Obituaries, Opinion, Politics, Regional

The enigmatic demise of Samora Machel: unraveling a controversy that shaped African liberation

Jones Gadama

The death of Samora Machel, Mozambique’s first president, on October 19, 1986, remains one of the most poignant and debated events in the history of African liberation.

More than three decades later, the circumstances surrounding the crash of his presidential aircraft near Mbuzini, South Africa, continue to provoke speculation, sorrow, and reflection on the broader geopolitical struggles that defined southern Africa during the late 20th century.

This tragedy did not just mark the loss of a leader; it exposed the fierce and often deadly contest between apartheid South Africa and the liberation movements that sought to dismantle it.

Samora Machel was not merely a political figure; he was a symbol of resilience and pan-African solidarity.

As the founding leader of FRELIMO (Front for the Liberation of Mozambique), he guided the country to independence from Portuguese colonial rule in 1975, becoming its first president.

His leadership was characterized by a firm commitment to Marxist principles, social justice, and the empowerment of the oppressed.

More importantly, Machel was an unyielding opponent of apartheid South Africa, offering support and sanctuary to liberation movements such as the African National Congress (ANC) and the Pan Africanist Congress (PAC).

His stance made him a direct threat to the apartheid regime, which viewed Mozambique’s independent government as an ideological adversary and a logistical base for armed resistance.

The official explanation for the crash, put forth by the apartheid government, was that pilot error caused the Tupolev Tu-134 to stray off course, ultimately leading to the fatal accident.

Their inquiry suggested that navigational mistakes brought the plane into South African airspace, where it crashed into a mountain near Mbuzini, close to the Mozambican border.

This narrative, however, failed to convince many, especially in Mozambique, the Soviet Union, and across African nations.

The mistrust stemmed not only from the political context but also from the nature of the apartheid regime itself—an administration notorious for covert operations, sabotage, and assassination attempts against its enemies.

The theory that gained prominence among critics of the official account is the “false beacon” theory. According to this theory, South African security forces deliberately set up a deceptive VOR (VHF Omnidirectional Range) beacon, broadcasting false navigational signals.

This tactic would have misled the aircraft’s instruments and caused it to veer dangerously off its intended flight path.

Such a sophisticated plot aligns with documented instances of South African intelligence operations during the apartheid era, which included assassinations and destabilization campaigns against neighboring states and liberation movements. While direct proof of this theory remains elusive, it has been bolstered by testimonies from survivors and independent investigators who questioned the integrity of the South African inquiry.

The death of Samora Machel had profound ramifications for Mozambique and the region. Politically, it dealt a severe blow to the nascent Mozambican state.

Machel’s leadership was a unifying force amidst the country’s ongoing civil war between FRELIMO and RENAMO (Mozambican National Resistance), a rebel group that had received covert support from neighboring Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) and apartheid South Africa. His death exacerbated instability, weakening FRELIMO’s morale and strategic coherence.

Economically, Mozambique was plunged deeper into hardship as the civil war intensified, with infrastructure destruction and displacement of populations.

The loss of Machel also signaled to other liberation movements that their leaders were vulnerable, reinforcing the brutal reality of apartheid’s reach beyond South African borders.

Internationally, the incident heightened tensions between the apartheid regime and the global community.

The Soviet Union and its allies condemned the crash as an act of assassination, framing it within the broader Cold War context of proxy battles in Africa.

The Western world’s response was more cautious, reflecting the complexities of geopolitical alliances and the delicate balance of power during the 1980s.

However, the tragedy galvanized African nations’ resolve to oppose apartheid more vigorously, leading to increased support for sanctions and diplomatic pressure against South Africa.

The legacy of Samora Machel transcends his untimely death.

He is remembered as a visionary leader who embodied the aspirations of African self-determination and unity.

His efforts to promote literacy, healthcare, and social equality in Mozambique set benchmarks for post-colonial governance on the continent.

Moreover, his commitment to pan-Africanism inspired generations of activists and leaders who continue to draw strength from his example.

The unresolved mystery of his death serves as a painful reminder of the high stakes involved in the struggle against oppression.

Reflecting on Machel’s demise, the African proverb cited often rings true: “Until the lion tells his story, the tale of the hunt will always glorify the hunter.” In this case, the “lion” is Machel himself, whose voice was tragically silenced.

Yet, through the memories preserved by his people and the ongoing quest for truth, his story challenges the narratives imposed by those in power.

It compels us to scrutinize history with a critical eye and acknowledge the sacrifices made in the pursuit of freedom.

In recent years, efforts to revisit the crash site and re-examine the evidence have been sporadic but persistent.

Technological advances in forensic science and aviation investigation offer hope that one day a clearer picture might emerge.

Until then, the death of Samora Machel remains a powerful symbol of the complex and often dangerous path toward liberation and justice in Africa.

It reminds us that history is not merely a record of events but a living dialogue between past and present, shaped by courage, memory, and the enduring quest for truth.

Obituaries, Politics, Regional

PF welcomes Hichilema’s apology over Lungu funeral as a step toward reconciliation

Burnett Munthali

LUSAKA-(MaraviPost)-The Patriotic Front (PF) has described President Hakainde Hichilema’s recent apology concerning the prolonged funeral arrangements of former president Edgar Lungu as a step in the right direction.

PF faction Secretary General Raphael Nakacinda said the President’s words carry significance especially in light of the sensitivity surrounding the Lungu family during this period of mourning.

He noted that Hichilema’s acknowledgment of the family’s concerns was an important gesture that could help ease tensions that have persisted since the passing of the former head of state.

Nakacinda expressed hope that President Hichilema’s commitment to address the concerns of the Lungu family once the funeral is concluded will be fulfilled in good faith.

He emphasized that the PF is looking beyond words and will judge the President’s sincerity by the actions he takes after the burial.

According to Nakacinda, the apology marks the first time President Hichilema has publicly recognized the impact that the prolonged funeral has had on the family, the country, and the wider region.

He argued that this recognition was not only necessary but also overdue.

On Friday, President Hichilema stated that he was prepared to listen and attend to the issues raised by the Lungu family once an honorable funeral had been accorded to the late former president.

He stressed that he remained conscious of the family’s feelings and did not wish to aggravate the pain they were already enduring.

The President’s words were widely reported and stirred mixed reactions across Zambia, with some welcoming the gesture while others questioned the timing and motivation behind the apology.

For the PF, however, Nakacinda insisted that this was an opportunity for the government to rebuild goodwill and demonstrate respect not only for the Lungu family but also for the office of the former head of state.

He added that a dignified handling of such matters sets a precedent for how the nation treats all former leaders regardless of political differences.

The PF faction further suggested that reconciliation on such sensitive issues could foster national unity at a time when Zambia is deeply polarized politically.

They urged the government to seize the moment to heal divisions rather than deepen them.

Civil society groups and commentators have also weighed in, with some urging both the government and the PF to focus on unity and respect during this difficult national moment.

Analysts note that the politics surrounding Lungu’s legacy have already divided opinion, and mishandling the funeral process risks escalating tensions further.

President Hichilema’s apology, therefore, could serve as an opening for dialogue and mutual understanding if both sides act with restraint.

Conclusion

The PF has welcomed President Hichilema’s apology over the Lungu funeral as a positive and necessary gesture, but they have also placed the burden of proof on his future actions.

For many Zambians, the question is whether this apology will translate into concrete respect for the Lungu family and a renewed spirit of unity, or whether it will remain another fleeting political statement.

At a time when the nation is in mourning, what is most urgently needed is compassion, dignity, and a reminder that Zambia’s democracy must stand above partisan divides.

Only then can the country honor its past leaders while building a more reconciled future.

Obituaries, Politics, Regional

Hichilema uhappy with his predecessor Edgar Lungu’s burial impasse

Burnett Munthali

LUSAKA-(MaraviPost)-President Hakainde Hichilema has expressed sadness over the ongoing disputes surrounding the delayed burial of his predecessor, sixth President Edgar Lungu.

He said he regrets that the matter has caused headaches and heartaches not only to the family but also to the nation, the region, and even the international community.

Speaking during an interview at State House with veteran British journalist Martine Dennis, President Hichilema apologised for the situation and stressed that his government’s stance was not based on personal motives.

He clarified that the desire to have Mr. Lungu buried in Zambia is rooted in the wishes of the Zambian people and the precedents set for past leaders.

The President emphasised that the court case surrounding the burial has delayed efforts to accord Mr. Lungu a dignified and respectful state funeral.

“I feel extremely bad that this debate is taking angles that are delaying the respectful burial of our sixth President, President Lungu,” he said.

“I feel very sad about it. But we are hoping that reason will prevail at some point. Because while the litigation is going on, we are negotiating,” he added.

President Hichilema dismissed claims linking the burial delays to witchcraft or voodoo, saying he personally does not believe in such practices.

“As a Christian, as a family man, I have never believed in witchcraft. Such a subject shrouded in secrecy should not take centre stage,” he stated.

He further underscored that only God gives and takes away life, while any human termination of life occurs through criminal acts such as shooting or poisoning.

The Head of State stressed the need to focus on giving Mr. Lungu a burial befitting his status, with full military honours, just like the five presidents before him.

“Let’s bury him in the place that citizens have chosen. There’s no malice. There should be no issue of witchcraft,” he added.

He questioned the logic of such accusations, asking: “Honestly speaking, what would one do with the dead?”

When asked why he could not simply let the issue rest and concentrate on other matters with elections approaching, President Hichilema replied that it was not about him but about the wishes of the Zambian people.

He noted that citizens’ decisions — moral, legal, and customary — must be respected by those in public office.

“So the issue of moving on, moving on to go where? Economic management continues, election management continues, and respecting the wishes of Zambians also continues,” he said.

President Hichilema acknowledged the concerns of the Lungu family, saying government remained open to engaging with them after an honourable burial is completed.

He apologised once again for exposing the family, the country, the region, and the world to what he described as an unfortunate situation.

The Lungu family, meanwhile, has challenged the South African High Court’s decision to order the repatriation of the former President’s body.

Analysis

The impasse over Edgar Lungu’s burial has become not only a family and national matter but also a political and symbolic one for Zambia.

President Hichilema’s remarks reflect an attempt to strike a delicate balance between respecting tradition, upholding the wishes of citizens, and maintaining dignity for his late predecessor.

His outright dismissal of witchcraft allegations underscores the danger of allowing superstition to overshadow legal and cultural processes in a democratic state.

The delay, however, risks creating deeper political divisions, with the burial of a former head of state becoming entangled in courtroom battles and public debates.

Moving forward, Zambia’s leadership will be tested not only in handling the burial with dignity but also in ensuring that the episode does not set a precedent for future disputes over state funerals.

Ultimately, the way Edgar Lungu is laid to rest will reflect the country’s respect for its history, its values, and its ability to unite even in moments of disagreement.

Obituaries, Politics, Regional

Lungu Family reaffirms right to decide burial as legal battle continues

Burnett Munthali

PRETORIA-(MaraviPost)-The family of the late former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu has issued a statement responding to recent developments in the Constitutional Court, reaffirming its commitment to pursue an appeal in defense of family rights over the burial of their loved one.

In the statement delivered on Wednesday, 26th August 2025, family spokesperson Makebi Zulu emphasized that the matter remains active before the courts despite the latest ruling.

The family had earlier applied for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal in the North Gauteng High Court of Pretoria while simultaneously seeking direct access to the Constitutional Court.

According to the family, the Constitutional Court has ruled that the appeal must first be heard by the Supreme Court of Appeal before it can be considered by the Constitutional Court.

This effectively means that the family must follow the normal appellate route, though Section 18(1) of the Superior Courts Act ensures that the status quo remains in place while the appeal process unfolds.

At the heart of the family’s appeal is the contention that the High Court judgment effectively stripped them of any rights in relation to the burial of the former president.

Zulu stated that the family strongly disagrees with the position that they have no say in determining the burial arrangements of their relative.

He also argued that the High Court erred in ruling that Zambian law should apply, noting that no such law governing the burial of former presidents exists in Zambia.

The family further criticized the court for failing to consider the evidence presented before it and for introducing new conditions on the repatriation of the late president’s body that were not part of the alleged agreement between the parties.

On the matter of negotiations, Zulu confirmed that the government, through Secretary to the Cabinet Patrick Kangwa, has approached the family to initiate formal discussions aimed at resolving the standoff.

However, he expressed concern that despite directives for restraint, public statements continue to be issued by both ruling party officials and government representatives on the sensitive matter.

The family also took issue with President Hakainde Hichilema’s remarks on August 24 while touring the Copperbelt, in which he suggested that former President Lungu resisted handing over power after the 2021 elections.

Zulu dismissed this claim as an insult to Lungu’s legacy, stressing that the former president had willingly conceded defeat, refused calls from within the Patriotic Front to petition the results, and actively facilitated a smooth transition of power.

He cited Lungu’s public remarks at the burial of the late Jackson Kungo where the former president openly declared his decision to hand over power without resistance.

The family also rejected allegations linking Lungu to past incidents in which President Hichilema claimed to have been targeted by shootings calling such innuendo regrettable and unfounded.

Zulu concluded by urging sincerity and decency in the ongoing efforts to foster an environment for genuine negotiations.

He warned that broken trust can only be repaired through deliberate and genuine steps.

The family expressed gratitude to the people of Zambia and other stakeholders who have stood by them during what they described as an immensely difficult period.

In conclusion, the statement by the Lungu family underscores the gravity of the legal and political dispute surrounding the burial of the former president.

While the family insists on asserting its rights, the government continues to position itself as an interested party, setting the stage for further tensions.

The appeal process now shifts focus to the Supreme Court of Appeal but beyond the courtroom, the matter has already become a test of sincerity, respect, and leadership in Zambia’s democratic journey.

The path forward will require not only legal resolution but also political maturity to ensure that the dignity of the late leader and the rights

Obituaries, Politics

Calls for compassion grow after mockery of Former President Lungu’s mourning

Burnett Munthali

LUSAKA-(MaraviPost)-A wave of public concern has emerged after sections of the public and some political figures mocked the family of former President Edgar Lungu during their period of mourning.

The development has sparked outrage, with many describing the behavior as “inhumane, un-Zambian, and a betrayal of cultural values.”

Child Protection and Education Advocate, Anastasia Mologadi Banda, has strongly condemned the actions, stressing that mourning is a sacred period that transcends politics, differences, and personal beliefs.

“Mocking the grieving does not reflect who we are as Zambians, it strips us of our values, dignity, and humanity,” Banda said in a statement.

The outrage follows apologies issued by political activist Larry Mweetwa and a few other United Party for National Development (UPND) members who admitted mocking the Lungu family.

However, their apologies have done little to ease the growing concern that political divisions in Zambia are eroding cultural respect for the dead.

Banda lamented that Zambia is among the few countries where such conduct has been witnessed openly.

She said the laughter and ridicule directed at the grieving family brought “shame upon the nation,” undermining Zambia’s long-standing reputation as a peaceful and Christian country.

“Our culture does not allow us to mock those who are mourning. It is inhumane to ridicule mourners, even where differences exist,” she emphasized.

The Advocate further expressed dismay that young politicians and party cadres were among those mocking the Lungu family, warning that such behavior signals immaturity and unreadiness for leadership.

She urged the next generation of leaders to learn humility, wisdom, and respect before aspiring for power.

Her concerns echo broader fears that Zambia’s political culture is increasingly being tainted by hatred and ridicule, with money and power overshadowing moral values.

Banda cautioned youths not to allow themselves to be used as “tools of hate speech,” but instead to lead efforts in reshaping politics into a platform of unity and compassion.

She also called on elders, church leaders, and traditional authorities to speak out and restore dignity to the mourning process, saying their silence has left a worrying gap in moral guidance.

“Zambia must return to compassion, unity, and cultural values that uphold our humanity,” she concluded.

Historical precedents in Zambian politics highlight that public backlash over disrespectful behavior toward grieving families has often forced political actors to apologize and reflect on accountability.

For instance, in 2014, political tension surrounding the funeral of veteran politician Michael Sata saw social media criticisms against some party cadres who mocked mourners, which prompted formal apologies and stricter guidance from party leadership on public decorum.

Similarly, during the 2018 passing of former Vice President Lupando Mwape, public condemnation of insensitive remarks from certain political circles led to media campaigns emphasizing respect for mourning traditions and the role of political leaders in modeling ethical behavior.

These examples illustrate that Zambian society has historically enforced a moral code that preserves dignity for mourners, and public outrage has often translated into corrective action, signaling the electorate’s role in holding leaders accountable.

Concluding analysis

The mockery of the Lungu family during mourning highlights a troubling trend in Zambian politics where personal attacks are encroaching on cultural norms.

Historical incidents show that public backlash can influence political accountability and push parties to enforce decorum and respect among their members.

Advocates like Banda are calling for a return to cultural norms and moral guidance, emphasizing that mourning periods must remain sacred and beyond political manipulation.

The involvement of young politicians in such acts underscores the urgent need for leadership training rooted in ethics, respect, and humility.

If left unchecked, Zambia’s political culture risks normalizing disrespect and eroding values of compassion, unity, and dignity.

This episode serves as a reminder that political rivalry should never come at the expense of human dignity and that leaders at all levels have a responsibility to model civility and moral integrity.

By restoring respect for mourning and promoting empathetic political engagement, Zambia can safeguard its cultural identity and ensure that political discourse does not compromise the nation’s ethical standards, reinforcing lessons learned from past public backlash incidents.

Malawi, Obituaries, Opinion

My Take On It: First it was Kapanga, then Sr. Chief Kachindamoto, and now ZamaChox

Janet Karim

“…. and He will wipe away every tear from their eyes; and there will no longer be any death; there will no longer be any mourning, or crying, or pain; the first things have passed away.”. — Revelation 21:4

The first two weeks of August in Malawi were lazed with the deaths of three prominent Malawians. As one was laid to rest, another also called to graduate to heaven.

Again barely before being laid to rest, another prominent soul left bewildered and crying relatives and friends.

The trio passing of Chris Kapanga, followed by Senior Chief Kachindamoto, Mrs. Theresa Chidyaonga Ndovi, who was then followed by MnuzanaRogers Zamachecha Mbekeani, riveted the country; reminding us again “This world is not my home.”

The late Chris Kapanga is the former Chief Executive Officer of Commercial Union and the first Malawian to hold that post. Upon retiring, he moved to NICO followed by a local and then Nigeria-based posting with Old Mutual.

At the time of his death, Kapanga, an avid gold master, was also chairman of the National Bank of Malawi.

The late Kapanga died from injuries sustained in a fall at his house in Sunnyside, Blantyre. Deepest condolences to his wife Jane and the family.

Within the same span of a week, announcement was made of Sr Chief Kachindamoto, also known as the Child Marriage Terminator.”

A soft-spoken chief that believed in her strength and resolve, the Sr. Chief had bylaws written in her district, preventing child marriages following the passing of the UN resolution calling for an end to child marriages.

The first substantive resolution on child, early and forced marriage (CEFM) was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in 2014, recognizing the urgent need to eliminate the practice.

Malawi was one of the key delegates in the Third Committee. The localization of the end to child marriage through the works of the late Sr. Chief was a very uplifting experience for Malawi diplomats in New York.

By the time Sr. Chief Kachindamoto came to Malawi, she was in line for receiving numerous awards for her tireless work towards ending the global scourge of CEFM. In paying tribute to her, prof CK wrote: “Malawi has lost an unyielding warrior for Malawi’s future

We have lost a very powerful leader. In the heart of Malawi’s Dedza District, one woman stood as a towering beacon of hope and transformation—Senior Chief Theresa Kachindamoto. Known as the “Terminator of Child Marriages,” her name resonates far beyond the 900,000 people she leads, echoing across the globe as a symbol of courage and compassion. Her life’s work illustrates the power of leadership rooted in justice and an unwavering commitment to the rights of children, particularly young girls.

Born around 1959 into a lineage of traditional rulers, Kachindamoto never anticipated the mantle of leadership. For 27 years, she lived a quieter life as a secretary in Zomba, raising five sons and serving her community in understated ways.

Yet, in 2003, destiny called her home to Monkey Bay, where she was chosen as Inkosi of the Dedza District. Stepping into the traditional red robes and leopardskin headband, she embraced her role not as a burden but as an opportunity to rewrite the future for her people.

Chief Kachindamoto’s legacy is defined by her fearless fight against child marriage, a deeply entrenched practice in Malawi, where over half of girls were once married before age 18. Shocked by the sight of girls as young as 12 bearing children, she declared, “This is too much. I must do something.” And she did. With unparalleled resolve, she annulled over 3,500 child marriages by 2019, ensuring that both girls and boys returned to school to reclaim their childhoods and dreams. Her bold actions—firing sub-chiefs who resisted, passing by-laws to ban early marriage, and outlawing harmful sexual initiation camps—transformed cultural norms in a nation where poverty and tradition often silenced progress.

Her approach was as strategic as it was compassionate. She built coalitions with mothers, teachers, religious leaders, and NGOs, creating a network of “secret mothers and fathers” to monitor communities and protect girls from being pulled out of school. She even paid school fees out of her own pocket for those in need, embodying her belief: “If girls are educated, they can be and have whatever they want.”

May her soul rest in Jehovah God’s eternal loving peace. RIJGELP)

Almost within the week, the Mbekeani Mayombo clan lost their towering legend: Mnuzana Rogers Zamachecha (known to me as Zamachox) Mbekeani after a long battle with sugar disease.

The first time I heard of the name Rogers Mbekeani was when he was working at Air Malawi. My then boyfriend (Adam Karim) who later became my husband, was auditing the company for Coopers and Lybrand and I was a high school teacher in Blantyre.

“I met your brother Rogers at Air Malawi,” my boyfriend told me.

I replied: “I don’t have a brother called Rogers.”

“Yes, you do,” he told me and continued to say that Rogers Mbekeani had just finished his education at Kamuzu Academy, and to further prove that I have a brother called Rogers Mbekeani, Adam told me that the said brother lives at my parent’s Maoni house.

Truly shocked and as a fledgling investigative journalist and historian, I asked my Mom about the said brother.

She confirmed. And also added that I have been seeing him, greeting or being greeted by him, even having been sitting near him at the dinner table in Maoni….. She further informed me that he is on his way to Chancellor College….. he is the younger brother of Uncle Daniels’s sons who had grown up in Zambia. (Hobbes Mayombo and Pemebrton Mbekeani).

I had to eat a massive dose of humble pie and go back to tell my boyfriend Adam that “Yes, I do have a brother by the name of Rogers Mbekeani….”

Upon graduating from CC, Rogers got into the Malawi banking sector (Commercial Bank and others). But it was his work and engagement with his large Mayombo clan that Rogers became a legend.Always at family functions and events, not as a guest or mere attendee, but steer or director of the occasions. He was a tireless energetic brand.

Upon reaffirming his Ngoni roots by letting us know that he is now to be known as Rogers Zamachecha Mbekeani, I gave him a pet name (this is my signature, my tradition – Pet Name Giver, a trait I gleaned from my Dad and his two brothers Uncle Ronald and Uncle Jasper): ZAMACHOX and sometimes when busy, simply CHOX.

Deepest condolences to sister in-law Grace, the children Thandie and Dumi Mbekeani (grown lady and gentleman). May Rogers Zamachecha Mbekeani’s soul rest in Jehovah God’s eternal loving peace. (RIJGELP).

Janet Zeenat Karim,

“If You are planning for a year, sow rice; if you are planning for a decade, plant trees; if you are planning for a lifetime, educate people.” – Asian Proverb

“Never stop LEARNING because life never stops TEACHING.”

Obituaries, Politics

Two mountains funeral parlour blocks Zambian Govt from inspecting Edgar Lungu’s remains

Burnett Munthali

PRETORIA-(MaraviPost)-Two Mountains Funeral Parlour has rejected the Zambian government’s request to inspect the body of the late President Edgar Chagwa Lungu.

The demand came from the administration led by President Hakainde Hichilema, which sought to send special envoys and commission a pathologist to examine the remains in Pretoria, South Africa.

In a formal letter addressed to VFV Attorneys, representing the Zambian government, the funeral parlour emphasized that its contractual obligations and professional duties are tied strictly to the Lungu family.

The Lungu family is identified in ongoing legal proceedings as the “First to Seventh Respondents,” giving them exclusive authority over the body.

The funeral service provider also cited confidentiality agreements and court orders issued on 25 June 2025 and 2 July 2025, which prevent any inspection of the body without written consent from the family.

The letter stated explicitly that no inspection or disclosure of related documentation, including embalmer or pathologist reports, could occur without prior consent from the Lungu family.

This stance came after the Zambian government wrote to the funeral parlour requesting that the remains be examined, citing concerns over the body’s condition.

Two Mountains Funeral Parlour clarified that the remains are being preserved according to standard operating procedures, and no visible changes in condition have been observed.

The matter is further complicated by ongoing court cases, including an appeal to the Constitutional Court of South Africa following a Gauteng High Court ruling.

The Lungu family contends that the High Court erred by applying Zambian law to a matter that falls under South African jurisdiction.

Article 18 of the South African Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013 was also cited, which suspends the execution of court orders pending appeals unless exceptional circumstances apply.

Given this legal framework, the funeral parlour concluded that the Zambian government currently has no jurisdiction to demand inspection of the late President’s remains.

The decision has sparked debate among the public, with some questioning whether transparency is being compromised, while others support the family’s right to control access.

Commenters on the story have expressed polarized opinions, ranging from accusations that evidence is being concealed to calls for respecting legal processes and the authority of the Lungu family.

This standoff highlights the complexities that arise when cross-border legal matters intersect with national interests and political sensitivities.

It also underscores the importance of respecting both domestic and international legal procedures in handling high-profile cases, especially those involving former heads of state.

In conclusion, while the Zambian government has expressed concern and sought clarity, the legal and contractual obligations of Two Mountains Funeral Parlour, together with pending appeals in South Africa, prevent immediate compliance.

The resolution of this matter will ultimately depend on the Constitutional Court’s interpretation, emphasizing the primacy of legal process over political pressure.

This case serves as a reminder that even sensitive matters involving former leaders must adhere strictly to law and protocol, balancing respect for families with the need for transparency.

Obituaries, Politics

“Lungu family’s extravagant spending in South Africa raises eyebrows”- Matomola Likwanya

Burnett Munthali

LUSAKA-(MaraviPost)-Zambian politician and a cadre of the United Party for National Development (UPND) Matomola Likwanya has raised concerns over the enormous daily expenses incurred by the Lungu family while in South Africa.

Likwanya who serves as the Lusaka District Information and Publicity Secretary for the party claims that the family spends approximately R300,000 per day (about ZMW 395,963.40 or MK 29,472,000).

The costs include storing a deceased body at a South African private hospital, which is typically part of the basic undertaker fees, starting around R4,000 (ZMW 5,280.85 / MWK 392,960) per day.

If multiplied by 60 days, the storage alone comes to R240,000 (ZMW 316,851 / MWK 23,577,600).

Cleaning and taking care of the body daily costs R10,000 (ZMW 13,202.91 / MWK 982,400).

Over a 60-day period, this service amounts to R600,000 (ZMW 792,174.6 / MWK 58,944,000).

The family also hired a private burial at a VVIP site, costing R50,000 (ZMW 65,990.75 / MWK 4,921,000), excluding other funeral arrangements like coffins and services, which reportedly reached R300,000 (ZMW 395,963.40 / MWK 29,472,000).

In addition, private security agents were employed at R250 per hour, totaling R6,000 per day (ZMW 7,921 / MWK 590,400), and over 60 days this amounts to R360,000 (ZMW 475,144.20 / MWK 35,424,000).

These costs are exclusive of apartment bookings for over 100 people and legal fees for top South African lawyers.

Likwanya estimates the Lungu family spends close to R300,000 per day (ZMW 395,963.40 / MWK 29,472,000).

Over a 60-day period, the total expenditure is estimated at R18,000,000 (ZMW 23,757,804 / MWK 1,768,320,000).

This extraordinary spending has sparked public debate over the source of the family’s wealth and how they amassed such resources in a short time.

Some observers argue that the family is indifferent to delays in the legal case because of their financial capacity, while concerns arise over the choice of lawyers who have allegedly prolonged the matter and added to expenses.

Public reaction has been mixed, with some criticizing the reported figures as exaggerated, while others emphasize the broader implications of such wealth in the context of Zambia’s socio-economic challenges.

Some citizens have pointed out that the government itself incurs costs in relation to the case, highlighting that taxpayer money is also at stake.

Others focus on moral and ethical considerations, urging that resources of this magnitude could have been directed to charity or public benefit rather than prolonged personal expenditure.

Despite the controversy, Likwanya’s remarks have shed light on the scale of spending associated with the family’s time in South Africa, prompting questions about accountability, wealth accumulation, and priorities.

Concluding Analysis

The Lungu family’s reported spending in South Africa exemplifies the intersection of wealth, privilege, and public scrutiny.

While some see it as a demonstration of financial capability, others interpret it as a reflection of societal inequality and misaligned priorities.

The debate also underscores the importance of transparency, both for private citizens and public figures, especially when legal proceedings, family wealth, and state involvement converge.

Ultimately, this issue is not just about money, but about accountability, societal perception, and the ethical use of resources in times of public interest.

Obituaries, Opinion, Politics

Political crossroads: Lungu’s burial limbo raises tensions ahead of 2026 Elections

Burnett Munthali

The burial of Zambia’s sixth Republican President, Dr. Edgar Chagwa Lungu, remains unresolved, leaving the nation in a state of uncertainty and legal limbo.

The Pretoria High Court has indefinitely postponed the case, pending a Constitutional Court hearing, with no date set, deepening frustration among citizens and political actors.

As the former president’s remains continue to lie in Johannesburg, observers describe the situation as “legal purgatory,” reflecting both procedural stagnation and national unease.

Beyond legal complexities, the delay has significant political ramifications as Zambia approaches the 2026 elections, with public perception of governance and justice hanging in the balance.

Political analysts warn that the extended limbo risks being interpreted as a manipulation of state processes, potentially influencing voter sentiment ahead of the polls.

Supporters of opposition parties have criticized the delay as emblematic of state inefficiency, arguing that it undermines public confidence in institutions tasked with upholding national honor.

Meanwhile, some ruling party loyalists emphasize the importance of due process, but the optics of prolonged indecision may fuel narratives of political obstruction and elite overreach.

Rumors and conspiracy theories about political vendettas, spiritual interference, and ritualistic intent have proliferated in the absence of clarity, further polarizing public discourse.

The uncertainty has left families and citizens in emotional limbo, creating a sense of frustration, helplessness, and skepticism toward both government and judicial processes.

Analysts suggest that urban and youth voters, in particular, may view the stalemate as a test of leadership credibility and institutional integrity ahead of the 2026 elections.

There is also potential for civil society groups to leverage the situation to advocate for transparent governance, framing the burial limbo as a broader issue of accountability and respect for constitutional norms.

The national debate underscores the intersection between law, politics, and public perception, highlighting how unresolved issues involving high-profile leaders can shape electoral narratives.

Ultimately, the delay serves as both a symbolic and practical reminder that political stability, voter confidence, and national dignity are intricately linked.

Concluding Analysis

President Lungu’s unresolved burial has evolved from a legal matter into a politically sensitive issue, with implications for Zambia’s upcoming elections.

Prolonged indecision risks eroding trust in state institutions and shaping voter sentiment in ways that could affect both ruling and opposition parties.

How the government and judiciary manage this sensitive matter may influence public perception of fairness, transparency, and respect for national norms.

For voters, the episode underscores the stakes of leadership, institutional integrity, and accountability in the lead-up to 2026.

In the end, resolving the burial with dignity and clarity is not only a matter of honoring a former head of state, but also a test of Zambia’s political maturity and commitment to democratic principles.