Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Author affiliations: Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA (S.J. Mowla); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (S.J. Mowla, N.A. Drexler, C.C. Cherry, P.D. Annambholta, I.T. Kracalik, S.V. Basavaraju)

Ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are emerging tickborne diseases caused by Ehrlichia and Anaplasma spp. obligate intracellular bacteria (1,2). Tick bites are the primary route of infection, but transmission can also occur through blood transfusion or solid organ transplantation, because these pathogens infect leukocytes and circulate throughout the blood stream (2). In the United States, human ehrlichiosis is caused primarily by Ehrlichia chaffeensis but can also result from E. ewingii or E. muris eauclairensis infections (1,3). Anaplasmosis is caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum (1). Although distinct diseases, ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis share clinical and laboratory features. Early symptoms often include fever, chills, headache, malaise, myalgia, or nausea, and many infections go unrecognized and undiagnosed (35). Laboratory features often include leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and elevated hepatic transaminases (35).

Both diseases have incubation periods of 5–14 days from the time of tick transmission, and during early illness infected asymptomatic persons or those with mild illness might be unknowingly accepted as blood donors (3,5). In general, higher rates of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are reported among adults >40 years of age, and most patients are men (57). Illness onset is most commonly reported during June and July, corresponding to peak tick activity (3,5). Approximately half of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis patients require hospitalization, and 7% require critical care (3,8). Case-fatality rates are ≈1% for E. chaffeensis ehrlichiosis and 0.3% for anaplasmosis patients based on national surveillance reports (3,5). In part because of immunosuppressive therapies to prevent organ rejection, transplant and transfusion recipients may be more susceptible to ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis. Relative risk (RR) for severe outcomes among immunosuppressed compared with immunocompetent case-patients was higher for hospitalization (RR 1.4), life-threatening complications (RR 2.4), and death (RR 2.3), highlighting the potential severity of disease in immunocompromised populations (3,915).

In the United States, ehrlichiosis was first reported in 1987 and anaplasmosis in 1994, and both became nationally notifiable diseases in 1999 (3,5,16,17). Since 2000, reported cases of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in the United States have increased substantially. Reported E. chaffeensis ehrlichiosis cases have increased >10-fold, from 200 in 2000 to 2,093 in 2019 (18,19). Reported anaplasmosis cases increased >16-fold, from 348 cases in 2000 to 5,655 in 2019 (19,20).

Increasing rates of reported ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis might be related to several factors, including improved diagnostics, changes in reporting practices, and expanded human contact with animal reservoirs and tick vectors (2,3,21,22). E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii are primarily transmitted by the lone star tick (Amblyomma americanum); A. phagocytophilum is transmitted by either the blacklegged tick (Ixodes scapularis) or the western blacklegged tick (I. pacificus) (3,5). E. muris eauclaurensis is transmitted by I. scapularis ticks. E. chaffeensis ehrlichiosis is most frequently reported in the southeastern and south-central regions of the United States, and anaplasmosis is most often reported in the upper midwestern and northeastern regions.

PCR and serologic testing using an indirect immunofluorescence antibody assay are the primary laboratory methods for diagnosing ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis (3,5). Because infection transmitted through blood or organs is rare, it might not be diagnosed in solid organ transplant and transfusion recipients. In addition, nonspecific signs and symptoms and a higher index of suspicion for other opportunistic infections might complicate diagnosis (14), which is unfortunate because early detection and treatment can prevent severe illness and death (23). Here, we summarize and discuss the risks of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis cases in the United States among solid organ transplant and transfusion recipients, with a focus on donor-derived infections.

Methods

We conducted a literature search to identify articles published during January–August 2020 describing ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in solid organ transplant or blood transfusion recipients in the United States. We used PubMed search terms “ehrlichiosis AND transfusion,” “ehrlichiosis AND transplant,” “anaplasmosis AND transfusion,” and “anaplasmosis AND transplant.” We included articles describing case reports, case series, or other clinical descriptions related to Ehrlichia and Anaplasma spp. infections in the setting of solid organ transplantation or transfusion of blood products in the United States. We excluded infections in hematopoietic stem cell recipients because these are not reported to a national notifiable disease system. For articles meeting inclusion criteria, we further reviewed references to identify any case reports or case descriptions not found in the initial PubMed search. Duplicate cases were only counted once for this review. We summarized transplant- and transfusion-associated cases as presented in the literature; we made no additional exclusions based on diagnostic criteria, and we only determined cases to be donor-derived if the authors presented them as such in the literature or investigations.

In the United States, all suspected or confirmed cases of donor-derived diseases are reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and are investigated by the Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC). Nationally notifiable diseases such as ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are referred to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for investigation and determination of whether the infection was transmitted from a donor to a recipient. We also included cases of transplant-associated ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis identified as part of these DTAC investigations by CDC if not already accounted for in the peer-reviewed literature (Figure 1). From each reviewed article or CDC-led case investigation, we collected available information on geographic region, recipient characteristics, Ehrlichia or Anaplasma species, transmission route, age of blood component transfused or type of organ transplanted, time between transplantation and infection, symptoms and clinical details, diagnostic methods, donor and recipient histories of tick exposure, donor characteristics, likely source of infection, and whether the recipient survived or died.

Results

Ehrlichiosis and Anaplasmosis Cases Reported among Transfusion Recipients

During the 1997–2020 investigation period, 12 cases of transfusion-transmitted ehrlichiosis or anaplasmosis were reported in the United States (Appendix Table 1). Of the 12 transfusion-transmitted cases, 8 resulted from transfused red blood cell components and 3 from transfused platelet components (2 apheresis and 1 whole blood–derived); the component for 1 case was not identified. Ten (83.3%) of 12 transfusion-associated cases were A. phagocytophilum infections; 1 case was associated with E. ewingii and 1 with E. chaffeensis (Figure 2, panels C, D). Median age of transfusion recipients was 66 years (range 9–85 years); sex was equally distributed. Of the transfusion-associated cases of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis, 3 occurred in Minnesota; 2 in Wisconsin; and 1 each in Georgia, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, and Oklahoma (Figure 2, panels A, B). Disease in all cases was diagnosed using PCR, and additional serologic testing was used for 2 cases. Most (83.3%) transfusion case-patients survived infection; one third of cases were associated with mild symptoms. Intensive care unit (ICU) treatment was noted for 2 anaplasmosis patients, prompted by respiratory failure, hypotension, and hypoxia. In addition, 3 anaplasmosis patients had multisystem organ failure, but ICU treatment was not mentioned for these cases. Two patients died, one from anaplasmosis and the other from other medical complications.

Ehrlichiosis and Anaplasmosis Cases Reported among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

During the investigation period, 107 cases of ehrlichiosis and 7 cases of anaplasmosis were described in the literature among solid organ transplant recipients. Of these, 63 included patient-specific information. We described the remaining 51 cases in aggregate and reported on them separately. An additional 6 cases of ehrlichiosis among solid organ transplant recipients were investigated by CDC, resulting in a total of 120 cases of ehrlichiosis or anaplasmosis described among transplant recipients during the investigation period.

E. chaffeensis ehrlichiosis was the most common organ donor-derived infection, reported among 8 solid organ transplant recipients: 2 cases we identified from the literature and the 6 investigated by CDC (Appendix Table 2). Of these, 7 (87.5%) case-patients were kidney transplant recipients and 1 was a liver transplant recipient. Fever was reported among all solid organ transplant recipients. Diagnostic methods were PCR (87.5%) and serologic testing (12.5%). Most (87.5%) patients were male, median age was 57 years (range 5–69 years), and median time between transplantation and infection was 13.5 days (range 10–25 days). Of the donor-derived ehrlichiosis cases, 2 occurred in Maryland; 3 in Missouri; and 1 each in New York, New Jersey, and Illinois (Figure 2, panel E). Among the 8 donor-derived ehrlichiosis cases, 2 deaths were reported among the kidney transplant recipients, both occurring <1 month after transplantation (Appendix Table 3). None of the confirmed transplant-derived case reports described ICU admission among the patients.

Thirteen cases of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis occurred <1 year after transplantation but could not be confirmed as donor-derived. The median time between transplantation and symptom onset in these 13 cases was 5 months (range 2 weeks–9 months) (Appendix Table 4). Of those cases, 4 were identified in Tennessee (Figure 2, panel F). E. chaffeensis infection was associated with 11 (84.6%) cases, and A. phagocytophilum infection was associated with 2 (15.4%) cases. Of the 13 cases, 5 (38.5%) occurred in kidney recipients, 4 (30.8%) in heart recipients, 2 (15.4%) in kidney and pancreas recipients, and 1 (7.7%) in a liver and lung recipient. Most (76.9%) patients were male, median age was 50 years (range 35–63 years), and PCR was the most common (76.9%) diagnostic method. Most (92.3%) patients infected <1 year after transplantation survived; however, 1 kidney and pancreas recipient with A. phagocytophilum infection died.

Forty-eight records of individual cases of ehrlichiosis or anaplasmosis that occurred ≥1 year after transplant were most likely attributable to posttransplant infections acquired through tick bites (Appendix Table 5). Median time from transplant to symptom onset was 6 years (range 1–21 years), most patients (75.0%) were male, and median age was 51 years (range 11–73 years). Among these patients, records described Ehrlichia infection for 43 (89.6%) and Anaplasma infection for 5 (10.4%). E. chaffeensis was implicated in 30 (69.8%) of 43 cases of ehrlichiosis, E. ewingii in 12 (27.9%), and an unspecified Ehrlichia sp. in 1 (2.3%). Twenty-three patients (53.5%) received kidneys, 8 (18.6%) livers, 7 (16.3%) lungs, 4 (9.3%) hearts, and 1 (2.3%) a pancreas. Of the 5 reported cases of anaplasmosis occurring ≥1 year after transplant, 4 (80.0%) occurred in kidney recipients and 1 (20.0%) in a liver recipient. Among the 43 cases of ehrlichiosis in solid organ transplant recipients who had illness onset ≥1 year after transplant, 26 (60.6%) occurred in Missouri and 12 (27.9%) in Tennessee; exact location was not specified in 1 report, but the case occurred in Alabama, Tennessee, or Mississippi. Among the 5 cases of anaplasmosis, 2 occurred in Minnesota, 1 in Maine, 1 in Wisconsin, and 1 in Connecticut. One patient had possible reactivation of a previous Anaplasma infection secondary to potent immunosuppression 9 months after the original infection. There were 2 reports of Ehrlichia reinfection that described distinct strains of E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii found in a secondary infection. Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, which is characterized by severe and potentially fatal inflammation, developed in 1 kidney transplant recipient. Of the solid organ transplant recipients with ehrlichiosis or anaplasmosis occurring ≥1 year after transplant, 47 (97.9%) of 48 survived. One pancreas recipient with an E. chaffeensis infection died. Seven cases occurring ≥1 year of solid organ transplantation did report ICU admission, possibly relating to long-term immunosuppression among transplant recipients.

Of the 51 cases of ehrlichiosis from Missouri for which we report data in aggregate, 18 (35.3%) occurred in kidney recipients, 12 (23.5%) in heart recipients, 12 (23.5%) in lung recipients, 7 (13.7%) in liver recipients, and 2 (4.0%) in kidney-pancreas recipients. Additional information on disease, pathogen species, and demographics was not available for these 51 cases.

Discussion

This study reviewed ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis cases among transfusion and solid organ transplant recipients described in published literature and reports from 6 CDC investigations. During the study period, 12 cases of transfusion-transmitted ehrlichiosis or anaplasmosis were reported, 2 of which resulted in death. In addition, 8 cases of organ donor–derived ehrlichiosis were reported (7 kidney transplant recipients and 1 liver recipient), 2 of which resulted in death. A. phagocytophilum was the most common causative agent among transfusion-derived infections. In contrast, among transplant recipients, E. chaffeensis was the most common causative agent. Donor-derived infections were observed among patients of a broad range of ages (5–85 years). Although children are not considered a high-risk group for anaplasmosis in particular, pediatric infection should not be discounted among transfusion and transplant recipients. Time from transplant or transfusion to the development of signs and symptoms varied widely and in most cases was longer than the typical incubation period for a tick-transmitted infection. Delays in symptom onset might be affected by the colony size and the site of the inoculated bacteria. Transfusion- or transplant-transmitted ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are rare but can result in severe outcomes including the death of the recipient.

Although known cases of transfusion- and transplant-transmitted ehrlichiosis or anaplasmosis are uncommon, studies of asymptomatic infection among blood donors and the survivability of infection in blood suggest the risk of transmission is greater than previously recognized. In endemic areas, seroprevalence studies found 11.3% of blood donors in New York, 0.5% in Wisconsin, and 3.5% in Connecticut had detectable antibodies against A. phagocytophilum (24,25). In Iowa, ≈1% of blood donors studied were seropositive for and displayed symptoms of ehrlichiosis after blood donation, although recipient lookback reported by physicians indicated that these transfusions did not result in transfusion-transmitted illnesses (26). However, serosurveys do not report active or incident infections, only the proportion of participants previously exposed to an Ehrlichia or Anaplasma agent. Some studies also examined the survivability of Ehrlichia and Anaplasma species in donor blood. Blood from anaplasmosis patients in 2 studies found viable A. phagocytophilum survived under refrigerated storage conditions for up to 18 days in whole blood (27,28). One in vitro study reported E. chaffeensis remained viable for up to 11 days within refrigerated packed red blood cells (29).

Donor-derived ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis highlight the importance of donor risk mitigation strategies in the setting of blood transfusion and solid organ transplantation and the potential role of laboratory-based screening. Recognizing and diagnosing tickborne diseases is complicated by long incubation periods and potential asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic infections. Although several laboratory tests are used to diagnose ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis, no tests have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to screen blood or organ donors for these diseases. Furthermore, serologic screening of donors might not identify active Ehrlichia or Anaplasma infections or could exclude healthy donors (28). PCR testing would more accurately screen contaminated blood and organ products, but no FDA-licensed test is available. Donor deferral on the basis of travel or residence would be impractically broad because of the widespread endemicity of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis across regions of the United States. To minimize blood supply disruptions based on travel deferrals for Zika virus and babesia, FDA previously recommended universal antibody testing and regional nucleic acid testing in states with the highest rates of risk for infection (30,31). Similar screening may eventually be necessary for ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis as the prevalence and incidence of these infections increases in the United States. CDC will continue to monitor the occurrence of transfusion- or transplant-transmitted ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis.

Among this study’s limitations, for sources identified through the literature we were limited to the information provided in the case reports, which might not always have represented a full account of the patient experience. Data on donor demographics were extremely limited. Donor state of residence might have provided a more accurate insight on likelihood of donor infection by state which might have broader implications for blood and organ screening criteria. Next, for the purposes of this evaluation, we relied on the characterizations by the original authors or investigators to categorize cases as donor- or transplant-derived ehrlichiosis or anaplasmosis. Finally, we included only cases published in peer-reviewed literature or reported to CDC, possibly underreporting transfusion- and transplant-associated infections. In 2019, the Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC, added questions relating to recent transfusion and organ transplant to their tickborne rickettsial disease surveillance system (https://www.cdc.gov/ticks/forms/Tick_TBRD_FILL_508.pdf) to better track donor-derived infections.

Because Ehrlichia and Anaplasma species primarily infect leukocytes, leukoreduction has been presumed to reduce risk for ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis through passive removal (23,32,33). However, 83% (10/12) of components implicated in transfusion-transmitted cases in this study were leukoreduced. In cell culture models, because of their presence in plasma also, E. chaffeensis survived in red blood cells stored in additive solution, suggesting leukoreduction alone will not prevent transmission of Ehrlichia and Anaplasma species (29). Adopting pathogen reduction technology, such as psoralen and ultraviolet light to inactivate infectious agents, for platelet and plasma products would provide additional safety measures to reduce risk for transfusion-transmitted Ehrlichia and Anaplasma infections. Pathogen-reduced plasma has demonstrated a ≥3.6-log reduction in viable A. phagocytophilum (34). However, this method has not been approved for red blood cell products, which were implicated in 8 of 12 cases of transfusion-transmitted ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in this study.

Identifying risk factors for Ehrlichia and Anaplasma infections among deceased organ donors is challenging because clinical, demographic, and social information about deceased donors is often obtained from family members, who might not have access to or recall all historical details (35). Also, routine laboratory screening of organ donors, required for multiple infectious diseases, including HIV/AIDS, does not yet include testing for infection with Ehrlichia and Anaplasma species. In addition, the number of posttransplant infections reported in this review highlights the risk among blood product or organ recipients. Therefore, clinicians must closely monitor recipients of blood transfusions or solid organs during long-term management and consider these pathogens when recipients develop signs or symptoms of infection. Because the prevalence of tickborne disease infections is rising, additional risk mitigation interventions will likely be necessary to enhance blood and organ safety.

Top

Follow Up

Earning CME Credit

To obtain credit, you should first read the journal article. After reading the article, you should be able to answer the following, related, multiple-choice questions. To complete the questions (with a minimum 75% passing score) and earn continuing medical education (CME) credit, please go to https://www.medscape.org/journal/eid. Credit cannot be obtained for tests completed on paper, although you may use the worksheet below to keep a record of your answers.

You must be a registered user on http://www.medscape.org. If you are not registered on http://www.medscape.org, please click on the “Register” link on the right hand side of the website.

Only one answer is correct for each question. Once you successfully answer all post-test questions, you will be able to view and/or print your certificate. For questions regarding this activity, contact the accredited provider, CME@medscape.net. For technical assistance, contact CME@medscape.net. American Medical Association’s Physician’s Recognition Award (AMA PRA) credits are accepted in the US as evidence of participation in CME activities. For further information on this award, please go to https://www.ama-assn.org. The AMA has determined that physicians not licensed in the US who participate in this CME activity are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Through agreements that the AMA has made with agencies in some countries, AMA PRA credit may be acceptable as evidence of participation in CME activities. If you are not licensed in the US, please complete the questions online, print the AMA PRA CME credit certificate, and present it to your national medical association for review.

Article Title: 
Ehrlichiosis and Anaplasmosis among Transfusion and Transplant Recipients in the United States

CME Questions

1. Your patient is a 62-year-old male kidney transplant recipient with fever and respiratory symptoms in whom ehrlichiosis is suspected. On the basis of the case series and literature review by Mowla and colleagues, which one of the following statements about donor-derived ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis cases in the United States among solid organ transplant recipients is correct?

A. During 1997 to 2020, most cases of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in transplant recipients were donor-derived

B. Ehrlichia chaffeensis ehrlichiosis was the most common organ donor-derived infection, occurring in 8 solid organ transplant recipients (7 kidney, 1 liver transplant recipient)

C. Half of cases in transplant recipients had fever

D. None of the donor-derived ehrlichiosis cases died, but two thirds of the confirmed cases were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU)

2. According to the case series and literature review by Mowla and colleagues, which one of the following statements about donor-derived ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis cases in the United States among transfusion recipients is correct?

A. Of the 12 cases of transfusion-transmitted ehrlichiosis or anaplasmosis reported from 1997 to 2020, 8 were a result of transfused platelet components

B. Most transfusion-associated cases were ehrlichiosis

C. Among anaplasmosis cases, 2 had ICU treatment for respiratory failure, hypotension, and hypoxia

D. One third of transfusion recipients with donor-derived ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis died

3. On the basis of the case series and literature review by Mowla and colleagues, which one of the following statements about clinical implications of donor-derived ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis cases in the United States among solid organ transplant and transfusion recipients is correct?

A. Transfusion- or transplant-transmitted ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are rare but cause severe outcomes including recipient death, mandating clinician awareness of these infections

B. Ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis cases in the US have been stable since 2000

C. Solid organ transplant donors should be screened using approved laboratory screening interventions

D. Studies of asymptomatic infection among blood donors and survivability of infection in blood suggest the risk for transmission is lower than previously recognized

The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.

Source : CDC Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal

NBS Bank Your Caring Bank