Swift justice as Mbwetule convicted over Malawi Electoral Commission’s stolen external hard drive

BLANTYRE (MaraPost)–Malawi Electoral Commission’s Data Entry Clerk, Hanleck Mbwetule , who was arrested for stealing an external hard drive belonging to the Commission , has been convicted after pleading guilty to the offence of theft by public servant.

 

He appeared before the Blantyre Magistrate Court Tuesday to answer charge of theft of public servant, according to MEC spokesperson Sangwani Mwafulirwa.

“He pleaded guilty to the offence and has consequently been convicted.

Sentencing will be tomorrow Wednesday, 26th February, 2014 before His Worship Bodole,” he said.

Meanwhile the convict has been remanded to Chichiri Prison.

Mbwetule worked as temporary data entry clerk with the Commission and was arrested for stealing an external hard disk from the Commission’s ICT Department.

 

Malawi still at crossroads, faced with recycled politicians, says Prof. Chijere Chirwa

BLANTYRE (MaraPost)–Malawi, which is about to celebrate 50 years of independence this July, is till at crossroads with recycled politicians busy enriching themselves at the ordinary poor people.

Professor Wiseman Chijere Chirwa (of the University of Malawi) spoke during an all-inclusive stakeholders conference organised by the Public Affairs Committee in Blantyre where he made a presentation titled ‘Malawi at 50: Are we a Developmental State?’.

 “The cashgate scandal is a clear testimony that Malawi, as a nation, is failing to safeguard its resources envelope.

“The country is faced with recycled politicians who have no clear vision for the country; they misguided the former presidents, and they are the very same people misleading the incumbent president,” said Chirwa.

According to him, the Nation don’t know where it is going, rampant corruption is making poor people more poorer and public resources like health and education have weakened.

The conference is the third in a series from the two which were held in March and October 2012 under themes ‘Time to Reclaim Our Destiny’ and Time to Restore Democratic and Economic Governance’, respectively.

This time around theme is ‘Malawi at Crossroads: Enhancing Transformative Leadership Through Holding Leaders and Ourselves Accountable’.

Speaking earlier, Norwegian Ambassador, Asbjorn Eidhammer observed that during President Bingu wa Mutharika’s first term in office remarkable progress in terms of increase in food production, poverty reduction and access health services was made in the country.

“The future looked bright. But in the course of a year or two after elections in 2009, Malawians found themselves heading for a new crisis. Human rights were under stress, and the death of 20 mostly young lives on 20 July 2011 shocked the whole country.

“We all know how it ended. But the achievements from this period will not be lost. And I am convinced that future leadership and police will see to it that 20 July does not happen again,” he said.

The Norwegian Ambassador went on to describe the infamous cashgate scandals as a “new political crisis’, and a ‘crisis in confidence of partners and population”.

“Similar looting has hardly seen in countries we would naturally compare with. Whoever is behind it, the Government in power must take responsibility,” said Eidhammer.

He advised the delegates to the two-day conference to provide solutions to the many challenges including corruption for the better of the country.

“We need to get as much clarity as we can in what has happened, and to see the guilty brought to book. We can all contribute to put a stop to the sense of impunity which must have been there, and make sure that similar fraud does not happen again,” he said.

Professor Matthews Chikaonda, Group Chief Executive Officer of Press Corporation, spoke on ‘Insulating Economic and Development Policies in Malawi’, Dr Gaston Kanchedzala of the University of Malawi made a presentation on ‘The Rule of Law, Transparency and Accountability in Malawi’, while Ministers of Finance and Justice and Constitutional Affairs spoke on ‘State of Affairs on Rule of Law, Transparency and Accountability in Malawi.

Whereas Reverend William Mumba of Zomba Theological College will on Wednesday speak on ‘Morality and Integrity in Malawi: A Faith-based Perspective’.

 

Politics and Religion: The top citizen abashes Malawian society

“Everything rises and falls on leadership”- John Maxwell

 I learnt with a shock that dead bodies at KCH have no space to be laid on. I was tempted to ignore assuming it may be an exaggeration considering that such things cannot happen if we have a leadership in place but then, I remembered that some so called leaders are irresponsible. PP government has been blowing a trumpet that MCP killed many people, I wonder if there is a record of how many if at all the number can compare with that which Cash gate has arrogated. We are told that MCP killed Sangala, Gadama, Matenje and many others. The issue went to court and the government lost because of insufficient evidences to prove the crime. Despite that, Bakili Muluzi and Bingu wa Mutharika used the demise of Sangala, Gadama and Matenje as a campaign vessel claiming that they were clean while MCP was blooded. Well, this is true to some extent but tell me, which party is clean in this country. If we are to vote on May 20, is just a matter of electing the lesser evil.

After claiming to be a political engineer, Bakili disgraced pastors and bishops during his tenure saying they should stay away from politics forgetting that they took a lead role in fighting Kamuzu’s one party system of government. Some chiefs were beaten in public. In 2001, there was a serious hunger in Malawi and many people died due to incompetent leadership to sort things out. Despite people losing their lives as a result of hunger, Bakili’s government took to task any chief who begged the president on political rally to help hunger situation in his area. We haven’t forgotten about Matafali’s mysterious death either.

Bingu started well but finished badly as Galatians, like Billy Kaunda sung in reference to Bakili Muluzi’s leadership. DPP cadets beat anyone they heard criticising Mutharika’s government. We know how many people died just for expressing their dissatisfaction with Mutharika government in the street on July 20, 2011. We haven’t forgotten about Chasowa’s mysterious death also.

These are the deaths we know and partly history though difficult to forget. I haven’t’ heard of any mysterious death with PP government because many of the deaths taking place are in lay man’s language. However, note that some drivers get imprisoned not because they hit someone deliberately but because of killing out of negligent driving. This is the case with PP government. We have lost many of our brothers and sisters out of government’s negligence to provide basic social services. Our lovely doctors and nurses took to street pressuring government to provide them with enough drugs and apparatus to use in hospitals and medical centres but alas, the loud noise has been hitting on deaf ears. This may be because none of their relatives is part of such suffering. May be because, they have money to fly out of the country for medical attention. However, don’t forget that when there were no necessary drugs at Kamuzu Central Hospital, Bingu died before he was flown to South Africa, who knows what may happen next. When people and doctors complained about lack of drugs in our hospitals, one irresponsible PP member attributed it to opposition interference in government affairs. He meant that hospitals are full of drugs but doctors are influenced by opposition parties to stage demonstrations just to discredit government. For sure, a responsible government cannot dare to vomit such bubbles. I think it’s high time we sued the PP government for lives lost out of its negligence so as to put it to record that PP has killed many people than any other government we have ever had. Imagine about 30 decomposed dead bodies buried in mass graves at Biwi cemetery as if we had genocide.

As John Maxwell says “everything rises and falls on leadership.” If we had enough security, drugs, quality education, employment opportunities, good roads and other social amenities, good salaries for civil servants and many others, it would be JB given credit. Now that we have a contrary situation, JB should receive the equal measure, I mean being discredited.

It is not a surprise that cold rooms are broken down. These fridges are always full since many people are dying of treatable diseases at KCH and other hospitals due to lack of drugs. We expect nothing less. This is a manifestation of a careless government which is set to bring indignity in our society. I believe that the hospital management reported this to the ministry of health or whosoever is responsible for repair or purchase of new fringes but this is happening out of negligence or insufficient funds since cash gate has finished it all. It’s pitiful our ministers are not functional either. All they know is to make the bow of the year like that of Binton Kutsaira. It pains me to hear ministers and MPs saying that, “I will do my best to please madam president. I will always pay my allegiance to her.” What a shame! You should first pay your allegiance to us electorates before anyone else. Malawian politicians are very disappointing and embarrassing.

I am afraid, if this government can be this irresponsible even after few months to general elections, how much worse and damage will it do if given a five year mandate. I expected this government to appeal for more votes by being sensitive to people’s concerns but alas, it is so insensitive. I wonder if we still need such a government after May 20. Dead bodies lying in wards, is very unMalawian. How can a sick fellow recover when s/he sees dead bodies all over around? My fellow Malawians, you know better how many people have died due to PP’s irresponsible governance. It is up to you to judge which party has killed many people. Count how many hospitals and health centres we have and record how many people have died due to lack of drugs within these two years. Then tell me which party is clean in Malawi.

Fortunately, we have May 20 as Jimmy Kainja said, “to vote for achievable policies and not one’s political survival.” We have May 20 to make a decisive choice for the next five years, to continue with this abashment and irresponsible government or try another. People have never died like this in our hospitals with the past governments, this is too much. The so called Human Rights Organisations are just scratching on JB’s back without tactual action on this irresponsibility but making noise about legalising homosexuality. So disappointing! They want to take Malawi government to court on the issue of criminalising homosexuals instead of suing government on issues like this. If I had enough money for legal battle, I would have sued the government myself as a concerned citizen. This is uncalled for.

I cry for my mother Malawi but I am consoled for God is a righteous judge and He will soon judge accordingly!

 

 

Sheikh Dinala Chabulika attacked for supporting Malawi’s President Joyce Banda

BLANTYRE (MaraPost)–Armed robbers Sunday night attacked Sheikh Dinala Chabulika’s residence in Mpingwe, Blantyre but the spokesperson of the Muslim Association of Malawi (MAM) and his family escaped unhurt after hiding themselves in the ceiling.

The attack has since been linked to a ‘muslim faction’ said to be against President Joyce Banda’s maize donation and Chabulika’s involvement in maize distribution to the Muslim community.

 According to sources, President Banda donated the maize and is using Sheikh Chabulika to woo support from the muslim community following the resignation of former cabinet minister Mohamed Sidik Mia, who was governing People’s Party Vice President for the southern region.

“Two strange men broke into the house baying for my blood while several others were closely monitoring what their colleagues were doing in the house, but I couldn’t recognise,” said Chabulika Monday morning.

The armed robbers, according to him, must have been sent by “some members of MAM who are unhappy with him for overseeing the distribution of maize given to them by the Malawi leader.

“There is no way you can please everybody, as such I will not stop working with the President in supporting hunger stricken families. And this is line with teaching of our faith,” Chabulika.

Meanwhile, National Chairperson of Muslims Women’s Organisation in Malawi, Fatima Ndaira has advised MAM to iron out the differences “islamically and religiously” and that they should not allow politics to divide them..

“Politics and religion are two different things. Let politicians do politics,” said Ndaira before declining to take more questions.

Meanwhile, Police are still searching for private practice lawyer Chancy Gondwe’s assailants following his attack by armed robbers last Friday.

He was attacked barely three days after his client Justice Mponda was acquitted by the Blantyre Magistrate Court on extortion charge in relation to a news article that was alleged to have scathing attacks on President Banda and members of her family.

 

Malawi High Court to hear case on mandatory HIV testing (Feb 25)

Lilongwe – On Tuesday 25th February, the High Court in Blantyre, Malawi will hear arguments on whether the police and medical personnel violated the rights of eleven women by subjecting them to mandatory HIV testing. 

“This case is about a group of women who were randomly arrested during sweeping exercises by the police and then tested for HIV without their consent,” said Anneke Meerkotter from the Southern Africa Litigation Centre (SALC), who is supporting the case. “The police and health workers showed complete disregard for the women’s rights. The High Court must stop this from ever happening again.” 

 

According to Gift Trapence, Director of the Centre for the Development of People (CEDEP), which is also providing support to the case, “the rights violations in this case highlight the necessity of having legislation which protects everyone from mandatory HIV testing”. 

What:              Blantyre High Court will hear arguments in case challenging mandatory HIV testing
Where:            High Court, Blantyre, Malawi
When:             25 February 2014 

On 10 March 2011, eleven women from Mwanza, Malawi, filed an application in the Blantyre High Court arguing that they were subjected to mandatory HIV tests and their HIV status was publicly disclosed in open court. The women argue that these actions by government officials violated their constitutional rights to dignity; privacy; liberty; non-discrimination; and freedom from cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. 

The applicants’ legal representative in this matter is Chrispine Sibande.

 Source: Southern Africa Litigation Centre (SALC) and Centre for the Development of People (CEDEP)

Accused Lawyer Kasambara mocks the findings in the so called forensic ‘CashGate’ report

On his Facebook page Ralph Kasambara mocking the findings of the forensic report commisioned by the brits, writes the following:

 

During a robbery in Guangzhou, China, the bank robber shouted to everyone in the bank: “Don’t move. The money belongs to the State. Your life belongs to you.”

Everyone in the bank laid down quietly. This is called “Mind Changing Concept” Changing the conventional way of thinking.

When a lady lay on the table provocatively, the robber shouted at her: “Please be civilized! This is a robbery and not a rape!”

This is called “Being Professional” Focus only on what you are trained to do!

When the bank robbers returned home, the younger robber (MBA-trained) told the older robber (who has only completed Year 6 in primary school): “Big brother, let’s count how much we got.”

The older robber rebutted and said: “You are very stupid. There is so much money it will take us a long time to count. Tonight, the TV news will tell us how much we robbed from the bank!”

This is called “Experience.” Nowadays, experience is more important than paper qualifications!

After the robbers had left, the bank manager told the bank supervisor to call the police quickly. But the supervisor said to him: “Wait! Let us take out $10 million from the bank for ourselves and add it to the $70 million that we have previously embezzled from the bank”.

This is called “Swim with the tide.” Converting an unfavorable situation to your advantage!

The supervisor says: “It will be good if there is a robbery every month.”

This is called “Killing Boredom.” Personal Happiness is more important than your job.

The next day, the TV news reported that $100 million was taken from the bank. The robbers counted and counted and counted, but they could only count $20 million. The robbers were very angry and complained: “We risked our lives and only took $20 million. The bank manager took $80 million with a snap of his fingers. It looks like it is better to be educated than to be a thief!”

This is called “Knowledge is worth as much as gold!”

The bank manager was smiling and happy because his losses in the share market are now covered by this robbery.

This is called “Seizing the opportunity.” Daring to take risks!

Malawians question authenticity of the Forensic audit report claim it was ‘heavily edited’

BLANTYRE(MARAPOST)—The Forensic audit report conducted by a British accounting firm, Baker Tilly Business Services Limited into the looting of public resources at Capital Hill continues to attract mixed reactions with[B] economic expert Henry Kachaje[/B] saying it is not genuine.

“How come it doesn’t mention that the Budget Director (Paul Mphwiyo) was the one fighting corruption and looting? How come it doesn’t mention that in September the President called the Minister of Finance (then Ken Lipenga) to start investigations on suspicious transactions as we were meant to believe,” queried Kachaje, who is also Managing of Business Consult Africa.

 Leader of Opposition in Parliament John Tembo is also doubting the contents of the report as it is in contradiction with the preliminary findings of the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), which indicated that over K20 billion was looted.

The forensic audit report, to be presented to the Speaker of National Assembly, Henry Chimunthu Banda monday by Minister of Finance Maxwell Mkwezalamba, shows that only K13.6 billion was mismanaged in the infamous cashgate scandal.

It only covers financial transactions of government for the period April to September 2013 and it does not mention specific names of individuals and companies that were involved.

The report also shows that K 6 billion was stolen between April and September 2013; K 3 billion was made as payments without supporting documents while another K 3 billion was stolen through exaggerated procurement prices.  

It says some local Banks and other international Banks were involved in the processing of dubious transactions which are connected to the stolen public funds at the Capital Hill.

However, Tembo is of the view that the K13 billion figure presented by the forensic auditors is small and that the figure has been deliberately lowered.

Some quarters have also faulted the report for not unveiling companies, individuals and the names of Banks which were involved in the malpractice.

They have argued that the report has not brought what Malawians were waiting as it is just like document confirming that there was indeed looting of public resources, which is common knowledge to every citizen.

ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda suffers serious jolt in Kenyan Prosecutions

Kenya: Nearly a half of the witnesses the prosecution lined up in the two Kenyan cases at the International Criminal Court have withdrawn, puncturing Ms Fatou Bensouda’s case.

The ICC prosecutor had lined up 77 prosecution witnesses to testify against President Uhuru Kenyatta, his deputy William Ruto and Kass FM journalist Joshua Arap Sang. But of these, at least 30 have so far left the cases, according to an analysis by The Standard of official ICC records and reports about individuals who have sworn affidavits withdrawing as witnesses.

 

On January 9, last year, Ms Bensouda had told trial judges the prosecution intended to call 43 witnesses in the Ruto-Sang trial. In Uhuru’s trial, the prosecution had hoped to call 34 witnesses— 31 testifying on the facts of the post-election violence and three expert witnesses. 

The exodus has jolted the prosecution’s cases because among those who have withdrawn are what prosecution labels “insider witnesses” because their testimonies directly implicated the accused. 

Among those remaining are expert witnesses whose testimony is largely academic. Documents filed by the prosecutor show at least 10 witnesses, including those the prosecution says are at the heart of the case against the President, will no longer testify. 

Prosecutors have since admitted the case against President Kenyatta is on the brink of collapsing, with the stones left unturned having become pebbles, after testimony by three witnesses on an alleged State House meeting, which was instrumental in confirming the charges, was found to be false. 

 Prosecutors admitted witnesses 4 and 12 gave false evidence about the alleged December 30, 2007 meeting at State House, Nairobi where retaliatory attacks on opposition supporters were allegedly planned.  “P-0012 recently admitted that he provided false evidence regarding the event at the heart of the prosecution’s case against the accused,” Bensouda told the court. “P-0012’s account lay at the heart of the prosecution’s evidence, providing a critical link between the accused and the crimes in Nakuru and Naivasha.” 

Witness Number 4 was a Mungiki insider who lied he attended the State House meeting and the revelation prompted Bensouda to withdraw the charges against Uhuru’s co-accused, former Civil Service chief Francis Muthaura.

Source: Standard Digital News

Anti-Gay Bill: Museveni responds to Obama

I have seen the statement H.E President Obama of the USA made in reaction to my statement that I was going to sign the anti-homosexual Bill, which I made at Kyankwanzi.

Before I react to H.E. Obama’s statement, let me, again, put on record my views on the issue of homo-sexuals (ebitiingwa, bisiyaga in some of our dialects). Right from the beginning of this debate, my views were as follows:

1. I agreed with the MPs and almost all Ugandans that promotion of homosexuality in Uganda must be criminalized or rather should continue to be criminalized because the British had already done that;

2. those who agreed to become homosexuals for mercenary reasons (prostitutes) should be harshly punished as should those who paid them to be homosexual prostitutes; and

3. exhibitionism of homosexual behavior must be punished because, in this part of the World, it is forbidden to publicly exhibit any sexual conduct (kissing, etc) even for heterosexuals; if I kissed my wife of 41 years in public, I would lose elections in Uganda.

The only point I disagreed on with some of the Members of Parliament (MPs) and other Ugandans was on the persons I thought were born homosexual. According to the casual observations, there are rare deviations in nature from the normal. You witness cases like albinos (nyamagoye), barren women or men (enguumba), epa (breastless women) etc.

I, therefore, thought that similarly there were people that were born with the disorientation of being attracted to the same sex. That is why I thought that that it was wrong to punish somebody on account of being born abnormal. That is why I refused to sign the Bill and, instead, referred it to our Party (the NRM) to debate it again.

In the meantime, I sought for scientific opinions on this matter. I am grateful to Ms. Kerry Kennedy of the USA who sent me opinions by scientists from the USA saying that there could be some indications that homosexuality could be congenital. In our conference, I put these opinions to our scientists from the Department of Genetics, the School of Medicine and the Ministry of Health.

Their unanimous conclusion was that homosexuality, contrary to my earlier thinking, was behavioural and not genetic. It was learnt and could be unlearnt. I told them to put their signatures to that conclusion which they did. That is why I declared my intention to sign the Bill, which I will do.

I have now received their signed document, which says there is no single gene that has been traced to cause homosexuality. What I want them to clarify is whether a combination of genes can cause anybody to be homosexual. Then my task will be finished and I will sign the Bill.

After my statement to that effect which was quoted widely around the World, I got reactions from some friends from outside Africa. Statements like: “it is a matter of choice” or “whom they love” which President Obama repeated in his statement would be most furiously rejected by almost the entirety of our people.

It cannot be a matter of choice for a man to behave like a woman or vice-versa. The argument I had pushed was that there could be people who are born like that or “who they are”, according to President Obama’s statement. I, therefore, encourage the US government to help us by working with our Scientists to study whether, indeed, there are people who are born homosexual. When that is proved, we can review this legislation.

I would be among those who will spearhead that effort. That is why I had refused to sign the Bill until my premise was knocked down by the position of our Scientists.

I would like to discourage the USA government from taking the line that passing this law will “complicate our valued relationship” with the USA as President Obama said. Countries and Societies should relate with each other on the basis of mutual respect and independence in decision making.

“Valued relationship” cannot be sustainably maintained by one Society being subservient to another society. There are a myriad acts the societies in the West do that we frown on or even detest. We, however, never comment on those acts or make them preconditions for working with the West.

Africans do not seek to impose their views on anybody. We do not want anybody to impose their views on us. This very debate was provoked by Western groups who come to our schools and try to recruit children into homosexuality. It is better to limit the damage rather than exacerbate it.

I thank everybody

China in Africa: Devil or Angel?

China has never denied that its Africa policy has its own strategic interests. However, one of the most outstanding features of China’s policy is its aspiration to promote South-South cooperation and to achieve the renaissance of Asia and Africa. Unlike the former colonial masters, China’s engagement provides Africa with new development opportunities

The Chinese government has always attached great emphasis on developing relations with African countries and it is also fully confident that the China-Africa relationship will enjoy a promising future. During his visit to three African countries in March 2013, Chinese President Xi Jinping declared that China and African countries have always been ‘a community of shared destines’ and the essence of the bilateral relationship exists in its mutually beneficial and win-win cooperation. 

However, too many doubts have been raised in the international community over the nature of China-Africa cooperation. As early as 2006, then Britain foreign secretary, Jack Straw, remarked that what China was doing in Africa was much the same as what Britain had done 150 years before. [2] Five years later, Hillary Clinton, the then American Secretary of the State, insinuated in Zambia in June 2011 that China’s presence in Africa was a new colonialism. [3] During a recent visit to Africa in January 2014, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said China’s aid to Africa was motivated by a desire to secure access to African natural resources. [4] This, to some degree, indicates that some westerners tend to interpret China’s Africa policy and Sino-African relations from the perspective of self-righteous moralists.

Speaking of China’s role in Africa’s development, is China a devil or an angel? As is well known, a nation’s foreign policy always serves its national interest. China is no exception. China has never denied that its African policy has its own strategic interests. However, one of the most outstanding features of China’s African policy from the very beginning is its aspiration to promote the South-South cooperation and to achieve the renaissance of Asia and Africa. Of course, there exist no doubt some problems in China-Africa cooperation, such as trade imbalance, lack of corporate social responsibility of some Chinese enterprises and so on. But, the fact is that China’s engagement in Africa provides Africa with new development opportunities and promotes Africa to integrate into the global system in a more favorable way. 

CHINA’S STRATEGIC INTERESTS IN AFRICA

First of all, China’s economic development benefits from China-Africa economic and trade cooperation. According to statistics, the bilateral trade rocketed from $10.6 billion in 2000 to $198.4 billion in 2012. Since 2009, China has been the largest trade partner of Africa, surpassing the United States and Europe. China’s outward foreign direct investment (FDI) stock in Africa increased fast from $400.9 million in 2003 to $21.2 billion in 2012. China began to import crude oil from Africa in 1992. The amount increased from 500 thousand tons in 1992 to 64.69 million tons in 2010. In recent years, crude oil from Africa accounted for 23.9% of the total of China’s imported oil. China’s economic interest in Africa lies in many fields, while the most important and urgent is to realize the diversification of its import of resources and energy. Like any other big power which has its own definite overseas energy interest and energy strategy, China doesn’t need to skirt around its energy demand from Africa. When facing Western criticism of China-Africa energy cooperation, China should not feel stampeded or panic. 

The China-Africa economic cooperation will also help Chinese enterprises to accumulate the experience they need in order to better engage with globalization, which is part of the significance of China’s enterprises going abroad to Africa. Through investment, trade and project in Africa, the Chinese enterprises can get precious experience of overseas market development, business management, capital operation, risk aversion and ways of dealing with local government, the public and the international community. Chinese enterprises in Africa are confronted with great pressures and criticism in respect of environment protection and labor-capital problem, which, as a result, promote Chinese enterprises to behave themselves, enhance their corporate social responsibility and gain more knowledge of rules of international economy.

Above all, China-Africa cooperation is of great strategic importance. In history, African countries have given China many extremely valuable diplomatic supports which could be manifested at least by three important events. First, African countries supported China to regain its legal seat in the UN in 1970s. Just with the help of African countries, China was able to break the diplomatic plight, returned to the international community and won world respect. Second, after the 1989 political turmoil, African countries again helped China to break the western blockade. In August and September that year, Qian Qichen, the then Chinese Foreign Minister, visited 8 African countries at their invitation. At the same time, the first foreign leader, the first government leader and the first foreign minister to visit China under western pressure were all from Africa. ‘They expressed that they visited China at that special time just to show the world that Africa was China’s real friend even when China was at the toughest moment.’ [5] In response to Africa’s support and help, the Chinese foreign ministers would make its first visit early every year to Africa ever since 1991. Third, on Taiwan issue, most African countries are staunch supporters to “one China” principle. History shows that whenever China experiences deteriorating international relations, especially with the West, Africa becomes an important factor in China’s diplomatic strategy. In fact, it can be said that if developing countries are the foundation of China’s foreign policies, Africa remains the most core part of that foundation. 

The first half of the 21st century is a critical period for China’s peaceful development. China desires for a stable domestic and international environment and expects to properly handle relations with other countries. China asserts time and again that it will not challenge any other nation’s interest and the current existing international order. While at the same time, China also hopes that other countries can respect its own core interest, the most important of which are the national unification and political stability. Some western countries on the one hand welcome and accept China to integrate into the international system, while on the other hand, they stick to the cold war ideology and mentality and put more emphasis on precaution and containment when dealing with fast rising China. Against this background, China needs to strengthen its relations with African countries and other developing countries in order to achieve its own strategic goals. China can optimize its relations with the whole of Africa to counter those few Western countries which try to prevent China from rising so as to enhance its own international standing and create a better and favorable situation for itself. 

In China’s overall diplomatic strategy, Africa remains a very important strategic pivot which is vital for China to develop its relations with the rest of the world. Currently, the China-Africa relations focus more on economic cooperation than political cooperation. However, the political mutual trust is still the important content of China-Africa new-type strategic partnership in the 21st century. China will not engage in military alliances, but China also needs political partners.

CHINA-AFRICA RELATIONSHIP AND CHINA’S INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY 

It is no secret that China’s African policy has its own strategic intention, such as seeking for political support from Africa, obtaining access to strategic resources, suppressing Taiwan’s so-called ‘diplomatic space’ in Africa and so on. However, there is an idealism or mission or aspiration beyond the national interest from the very beginning in China’s African policy, which, unfortunately, is always overlooked, suspected or even denied by some foreign scholars. 

The birth of the People’s Republic of China in 1949 marked the Chinese people’s liberation and political independence in a true sense. This process began earlier in China than in most African countries. Due to the hostility of Western countries towards the new People’s Republic of China – the same experience shared with the other Asian and African countries of being invaded by the West – and the distinct internationalism championed by the Chinese communist party, the new China from the very beginning regarded itself as a member of those oppressed nations and newly independent nations, and spared no efforts to fight together with those oppressed nations against the invasion of imperialism. In 1960s and 1970s, China provided foreign aid even beyond its own capability to African countries, including some facilities China itself was even reluctant to use. China rallied the strength of the whole nation to help Tanzania and Zambia build the 1,860-kilometer long Tazara Railway, which was the most outstanding example of supporting African countries’ national independence movement during that period. Frankly speaking, the absolute amount of China’s aid to Africa was not so large at that time, but China gave whatever it could afford at a time when its own economic foundation was fragile and weak or even when China itself was experiencing extremely great economic difficulties. This showed with no doubt China’s sympathy and support for the cause of independence and development of African countries.

At present, China is gradually becoming a developed country, at the same time it still aspires to try its best to help African countries realize their development dream. China is the largest developing country and its future foreign relations will be based on strategic partnership with African and other developing countries, which determine China’s growing global responsibilities. China should not only work along with other major powers to maintain the stability of the world financial order, fight against terrorism, prevent the global warming, most important, China should push forward the poverty reduction and development of developing countries, promote a more balanced world economy and the solution to south-north problem, and help those developing countries in turmoil to realize political stability. Based on its own identity and national interests, China’s global responsibility should focus more on developing countries which constitute the biggest part of the international community. Just as President Xi Jinping remarked when he was visiting Africa, ‘Under the new circumstance, China-Africa relations have become more important with greater common interests, instead of less important with fewer common interests. China will intensify, not weaken its efforts to expand relations with Africa’. [6]

This pledge can be best manifested by China’s efforts to propel Africa’s development through investment, trade and foreign aid. To enhance Africa’s capability of self-development and improve African people’s life, current China-Africa cooperation, in line with the top priorities of development listed by the African Union and the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD), focuses mainly on the fields of infrastructures, medicine and public health, technology transfer and training as well as development of human resources. 

It can’t be denied that China-Africa economic cooperation has gained great achievements: China’s commodities are suitable for the consumption level of common African people and the quality of their lives has been improved; China’s investment in Africa has spurred Africa’s economic development and especially their infrastructure building; the prices of African raw materials have been raised in line with the increasing demand by China, which is beneficial to Africa. It is no exaggeration that China-Africa cooperation has benefited Africa a great deal; otherwise, the cooperation would have not developed so fast in the past years. Well-informed African people in the majority welcome China’s trade with Africa and place great expectation on China-Africa relations. From an objective perspective, the active African market is also beneficial to Western countries. 

Speaking about European and American foreign aid to Africa, it is our view that there is more or less a sense of atonement for the crimes they committed to African people in the past. In history, they either colonized Africa or conducted the slavery business in Africa or both. On the contrary, China’s foreign aid to Africa as well as its economic cooperation with Africa displays a much more sense of mission, for it has no historical burden related to Africa. In Chinese traditional culture, there is the concept of ‘Datong’????, literally meaning, ‘great harmony’. Put in modern words, it means the common prosperity all over the world and the peaceful and harmonious coexistence of all the human beings and all the nations. For the time being, China is not a fully developed country yet and it still stresses the need to concentrate its efforts its own domestic development. However, the more China further develops, the more its sense of global responsibility will be enhanced. And Africa will be the place where China’s global responsibility will be best witnessed. 

In essence, the contemporary China-Africa relationship is a brand-new reciprocal and mutually beneficial relationship which can promote the common development of both sides. It is a new type of strategic partnership based on political equality, characterized by mutual benefit and aimed at common development. It reflects China’s good will to advocate common prosperity and long-lasting peace of the whole world. China successively put forward well-known concepts such as ‘peaceful development’ and ‘harmonious world’, which demonstrates that China, sticking to a peaceful development path, will continue to view the relationship between its own international responsibility and the outside world in a broad vision of cosmopolitanism. In this sense, it is reasonably sound to say that promoting Africa’s common development will be an important part of China’s foreign policy in the new era. China’s development not only brings good to itself, but also benefits Africa and the rest of the world. 

THE ADJUSTMENT OF CHINA’S AFRICAN POLICY IN THE FUTURE

It is during the past ten years that China-Africa economic and trade cooperation witnessed its fastest development, but at the same time, it was also a period when most problems arose. For example, China maintained trade surplus to most African countries except those rich in minerals, some Chinese products were shoddy goods, and there happened some labor-capital disputes in some Chinese enterprises in Africa and so on. The Chinese government has shown a great concern about all these problems and is figuring out ways to tackle them.

To solve the problem of trade surplus to some African resource-poor countries, since 2005, China has decided to generally grant zero-tariff treatment to some commodities from the least developed countries (LDCs) in Africa. By July 2010, African commodities entitled to zero-tariff treatment had covered more than 4,700 taxable items. [7] To enhance the African countries’ production capacity and ability to earn foreign exchange through export, China has established economic and trade cooperation zones in Zambia, Mauritius, Nigeria, Egypt and Ethiopia. Whenever visiting Africa, Chinese leaders always meet with the personnel in charge of Chinese enterprises and require them to fulfill corporate social responsibility and take into consideration the long-run development of local areas. The Ministry of Commerce, the Foreign Ministry and the Chinese Customs have also issued related policies to enhance supervision over Chinese enterprises and products. All these measures and policies may take time to take effect. The Chinese government still needs to improve related policies, regulations and measures of supervision. Chinese enterprises also need, as soon as possible, to acquire the knowledge of global rules, regulations and standards, to carry out their social responsibilities and gradually improve their enterprises’ image.

In the long run, China should contribute more to Africa’s development while emphasizing the mutually beneficial and win-win characteristics of the China-Africa cooperation. Since African countries’ industrial development capacity is weaker than China’s and are in an inferior competitive position in the globalized economy based on market principles, China should take particular care of Africa’s development, provide more help and benefits to Africa in the course of their bilateral economic cooperation. It can’t only stress its own economic gains through cooperation; instead, it must strive for the common development hand in hand with African countries. Besides, China’s engagement in Africa should answer the call of humanitarianism to help the needy and redress the unjust imbalances. To be a world influential power, China must learn how to help others while achieving its own development. 

With the increasing consciousness of its global responsibility as well as the increasing strategic significance of the China-Africa relationship, China surely will contribute more to Africa’s peace and development. At the same time, African countries are attaching more importance to an all-around cooperation with China so as to promote their own renaissance and balance their traditional relations with western countries. Under such circumstances, we are firmly confident that the China-Africa relationship will have a much brighter future. 

? Luo Jianbo is director and professor of Center for African Studies, Party School of Central Committee of CPC. His study covers China-Africa relations, African integration, Africa’s peace and development. Zhang Xiaomin is associate professor at Beijing Foreign Studies University. His field covers China-Africa relations and China’s foreign aid.

Exit mobile version