Category Archives: Politics

Malawi has a multi-party system with over 40 registered political parties.The political process in Malawi is such that parties are voted into power. Parties participate in an electoral process. The parties with the most representation in the National Assembly are the People’s Party (PP), Malawi Congress Party (MCP), United Democratic Front (UDF), and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).

President of Malawi 

Under the country’s 1966, 1994 and 1995 constitutions, the President is executive head of state. The first President was elected by the National Assembly, but later presidents were elected in direct popular elections for a five-year term. In the event of a vacancy, the Vice-President becomes President.

  Denotes Vice-President acting as President
? President
(Birth–Death)
Portrait Tenure Elected Political affiliation
(at time of appointment)
Took office Left office Time in Office
1 Hastings Banda
(1899–1997) [1]
Dr HK Banda, first president of Malawi.jpg 6 July 1966 24 May 1994 27 years,319 days Malawi Congress Party
2 Bakili Muluzi
(1942–)
Muluzi.png 24 May 1994 24 May 2004 10 years,3 days 1994
1999
United Democratic Front
3 Bingu wa Mutharika
(1934–2012)
Mutharika at Met.jpg 24 May 2004 5 April 2012
(died in office.)
7 years,316 days 2004 United Democratic Front
2009 Democratic Progressive Party [2]
4 Joyce Banda
(1949–)
Joyce Banda August 2012.jpg 7 April 2012 31 May 2014 2 years,54 days People’s Party
5 Peter Mutharika
(1939–)
Peter Mutharika 2011 (cropped).jpg 31 May 2014 Incumbent 4 years,103 days 2014 Democratic Progressive Party

Standards

President Mnangagwa reverses Chiwenga’s decision on Police bosses, rift EXPOSED

By Muza Mpofu

HARARE-The mass dismissal of top police officers on Thursday and the surprise about-turn by government, rehiring most of them less than 24 hours later, has exposed a possible rift and simmering conflict within President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s government, The Standard has established.

According to sources, the office of Vice-President Constantino Chiwenga allegedly ordered the mass dismissals without Mnangagwa’s approval or knowledge, resulting in the president overturning some of the terminations upon his return from a working visit in Zambia.

Sources within government said while Mnangagwa had authorised the firing of 11 top police officers, described as “retirements”, the number had been increased to 32 during his absence.

The Standard heard that the purges were earmarked to cascade to officers commanding provinces as the axe continues to fall on officials linked to the vanquished G40 faction in Zanu PF.

Since the firing and reinstatement saga last week, government has failed to give a satisfactory explanation about what transpired.

Presidential spokesperson George Charamba Saturday dismissed the “rift and conflict” allegations as wishful thinking by people who were too obsessed with conflict.

He, however, admitted Mnangagwa overturned the decision after realising it was done without following the proper procedure. He said the action appeared to be an overreaction to public disaffection with the police by the Police Service Commission chaired by Mariyawanda Nzuwa.

“We are dealing with security here. We don’t treat it like we are treating civilian structures,” Charamba said.

“Yes, it was done when the president was away and when he came back, he discovered we had thrown away the bath water with the child and corrective measures had to be taken.”

Charamba added: “As I speak, I am sitting with two more names which have been removed from the list — Erasmus Makodza and Douglas Nyakutsikwa. We are now down to nine. It was a well-meant move by the Police Service Commission, but spoiled by overreaction and the president, with his two deputies, reversed the decision.”

“They [Mnangagwa and Chiwenga] are all at one. The decision to reverse the dismissals was done by the president and his two deputies [Chiwenga and Kembo Mohadi]. We are actually out to evolve into a harmonious administration. Such allegations [of rift and conflict] are made by people who wish for us to go back to conflict,” Charamba said.

But government sources claim that Mnangagwa approved the firing of 11 senior officers only but an order was given to the Police Service Commission to retire all top police officers above 50 years of age.

It was not immediately clear who gave the order that was later reversed by Mnangagwa, but sources claim the directive came from Chiwenga’s office.

“It showed some sort of discord in government. But I think the problem was caused because the sacking of some police officers was done without the full knowledge and approval of the president who was away in Zambia,” a well-placed source in government claimed.

Initially, those who were reportedly shown the exit door included Deputy Commissioner-Generals Innocent Matibiri (Human resources), Levi Sibanda (Operations) and Josephine Shambare Crime). Commissioners Olga Bungu, Mekia Tanyanyiwa, Grace Ndebele, Senior Assistant Commissioner Charity Charamba, Godfrey Munyonga, Angelina Guvamombe, Justice Chengeta, Robert Masukusa, Eve Mlilo, Grace Maenzanise, Prudence Chakanyuka, Erasmus Makodza, Wiklef Makamache, Edward Fusire and Douglas Nyakutsikwa.

The retirement letters were signed by Acting Commissoner-General Godwin Matanga and were titled “Retirement from the Zimbabwe Republic Police in Terms of Section 22(3) of the Police Act Chapter 11:10”.

The following day on Friday, Commissioner Rabson Mpofu (Planning and Development) made the surprise about-turn saying only 11 had been retired. These included Senior Assistant Commissioners Munyonga, Chengeta, Nyakutsikwa, Masukusa, Makodza, Chakanyuka, Mlilo, Maenzanise and Taedzerwa.

According to sources the axe will soon fall on several top CIO operatives, mainly directors, deputy directors and assistant directors. They would be replaced by personnel from the military intelligence, sources said.

“About 20 directors in the CIO have been listed for dismissal and the letters await to be signed by the CIO Director General Isaac Moyo,” a source said.

Chiwenga is also reportedly targeting directors and senior personnel at Zimpapers and the national broadcaster, ZBC over alleged links to former Higher Education minister Jonathan Moyo. Most of them were reportedly appointed when Moyo was still with the ministry of Information.

Some raft of changes were also likely at the Police Support Unit, with Chiwenga, who is the VP in charge of defence, planning to integrate some police officers with military training into the army.

During the military intervention that toppled former president Robert Mugabe, the military reportedly put the Chikurubi Support Unit under siege following perceived resistance to Operation Restore Legacy. The police in that unit had reportedly refused to surrender keys of the armoury.

Police officers from the Support Unit with alleged links to G40 will be retired while the army will provide senior top officers to command the station and the current troop commanders reposted, sources said.

However, no such purging is expected in the military where, in contrast, many officers have recently been promoted.

Many senior army officers with the rank of Lieutenant Colonel upwards also reportedly received twin cab vehicles during the operation which they still possess, the government source said.

UDF quagmire over 2019 polls

Rex Chikoko,-Weekend Nation

United Democratic Front (UDF) regional governors have asked the party’s national executive committee (NEC) to start working on contesting the 2019 presidential elections.

They have also asked Atupele Muluzi to come clear on the party’s relationship with DPP ahead of the elections.

Since the 2014 elections, UDF has been in a parliamentary relationship with the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).

But at last month’s UDF NEC meeting in Blantyre, the regional governors asked the leadership to contest at presidential level, sources in the party have revealed.

The governors feared that DPP and UDF might form a political coalition during the 2019 elections on condition that Muluzi will be a running-mate.

But UDF spokesperson Ken Ndanga, in an interview yesterday, said the party will not settle for the running-mate position.

He also confirmed that the governors are protesting any move to go to the polls on a DPP ticket.

Said Ndanga: “It is true that regional governors asked the party leadership to contest at presidential level. The governors specifically asked Muluzi to contest as a UDF president at the convention so that he could contest at the 2019 elections.”

The UDF publicist said the party is yet to decide who will contest at the presidential level, as the party’s convention, to be held in the first quarter of 2018 will decide who the 2019 presidential candidate will be.

However, long time challenger of the UDF leadership on the DPP working relationship, Balaka North legislator Lucius Banda said he will contest against Muluzi at the party’s convention if Muluzi will not come out clear on the party’s working relationship with DPP.

“If Atupele comes out of the DPP relationship I will support him, but if he is not clear, I will be forced to contest against him in order to save the party from dying,” he said.

Banda said a lot of UDF members—at different levels—are supporting his candidature but he will be obliged to contest if Muluzi does not clarify the party’s relationship with the DPP.

“I am duty-bound to protect the party and save it from dying. I am observing what is happening at the moment. I will contest against Muluzi if he is not clear about his position with DPP,” he said.

One UDF source confided in Weekend Nation that there is a bit of confusion in the party as it seems the leadership was banking on the position of running-mate to the DPP candidate.

“The issue of regional governors asking the party to contest at the presidential level would be a scapegoat to cover up the party’s indecision. If Muluzi is offered the position of DPP running-mate he would not think twice about what the NEC says or thinks.

“In short, the future of UDF is in the hands of the DPP,” he said.

On the working relationship between UDF and DPP, Ndanga said the parliamentary working relationship could not be construed as a coalition of the two parties, adding that the parties only cooperate at parliamentary level.

“We have a parliamentary coalition with DPP and nothing like party-to-party. We cannot bank the party’s hopes on a running-mate position to other parties. We do not know at the moment who will contest at the presidential level since the nomination process has not started,” he said.

Ndanga further clarified that the UDF NEC has powers to terminate the parliamentary relationship between the UDF and DPP as empowered by article 10 (f) of the UDF constitution which reads in part that: “The national conference shall have a right to review, ratify, alter, or rescind any decision taken by any organ or member of the party.

“This means that a decision that NEC has made or will be made in future regarding the working relationship with other parties would be ratified or overturned by the national conference.”

He said the convention agenda will be guided by article 10 (h) of the party constitution which says that the party shall hold at least one national conference every six years to receive and consider the president’s, secretary general’s report, treasurer general’s report and to elect members of NEC and other office bearers of the party.

DPP spokesperson Francis Kasaila told The Nation newspaper that the party’s position on the relationship with UDF has not changed saying: “There have not been any new development and that DPP position was that the party was not in a coalition with UDF.”

UDF, former ruling party, is currently struggling to establish a foothold in the country since former president Bingu wa Mutharika ditched the party in 2005 to form DPP.

Open letter to Lilongwe City Council Mayor Desmond Bikoko on poor leadership

By Patrick Ulele Chikoti, A resident of Area 49

Dear Mayor of Lilongwe City Councillor Dr Desmond Bikoko,

I thank God that we have a new year 2018 before us. I wish you the best in this year realising that you have a huge task to shape this City of Lilongwe with your fellow Councillors and all of us the ‘People of Lilongwe City’ , and that includes me.

My reason for writing my one and only letter to you since God chose you as a Mayor of this beautiful city is not to waste your precious time rather utilise that time effectively on one important issue. I know your leadership task in this City is noble as you lead the City of Lilongwe to prosperity.

I have written this letter to ask for answers to a number of issues on the ‘Floods that happened in Mtandire, Area 49, Area 47’ last year in February. There are so many unanswered questions.

Dr. Bikoko, you may wish to know that my family was one of the affected during the floods on 10 February 2017. As you already know we were not the only family affected by that environmental catastrophe that morning.

The most affected were our brothers and sisters in Mtandire, who are part of the more than 75% of the City’s population and are mostly residing in such disaster prone areas of this City. In our case we were affected but we managed to pull through with support from a number of sources (friends, family, church) , of course from Government as well through food distributions among others. We thank all those who helped.

My main point is on the steps taken by the Lilongwe City Council on the causes of the floods, the preparations for the possible floods this rain season as well as beyond and the communications this far. As a resident of this City and an affected person, just like the rest of the people in Mtandire, Area 49, Area 47 we are yet to know from our Honourable Council what the causes of those floods were.

I understand such information is critical for any person and even the Lilongwe City Council to plan and check what measures to be put in place to avoid future occurrences. Undocumented history is heard that a similar flood of such magnitude happened in 1990.

So, looking at the situation of settlements then and now, we know that due to urbanisation at more than 4.3%, we are increasing the risk of loosing life and property with each passing year. What does this mean then? We have to have a City which is more resilient to a number of issues including floods.

In the case of Lilongwe City we had expected to hear official details on the cause of the flood and then the City Council informing us how we need to avoid future catastrophes. Where need be the Council would have included disaster measures on disaster risk reduction that would have been communicated to us, ‘The People of Lilongwe City’ on time.

I must say that I fault the Lilongwe City Council in the way it is handling this issue of floods. And, with more parts of the City experiencing flash floods I have no doubt you need to engage an extra gear in this area of disaster risk reduction and preparedness your Worship and your fellow members of the Council. It might be that there is something being done but with lack of communication, do not fault us, ‘The People’ for insinuating that you are not doing anything on this issue of disasters in Lilongwe City.

I am someone who believes that it is never too late. Though close to a year now, I still give you, our Mayor Dr. Desmond Bikoko a chance to explain to us, ‘The People of Lilongwe City’ on the cause, the measures you are employing for Lingadzi River potential future floods. My optimism on your communication with solutions, I believe is shared with the rest of the people in Area 49, Mtandire and Area 47.

I have attached a picture to remind us of what happened on 10 February 2017. I am sure those kids who were trapped in those ragging waters, and only saved by some slightly stronger maize stalks, would not want a repeat of what happened to them. And may the souls of those we lost on that fateful day rest in peace (rumours circulate that we lost 9 people in total and most of them were trying to save the two kids in the picture).

Thank you your Worship The Mayor of Lilongwe City, Dr. Desmond Bikoko for sparing your time in reading this. I know you will respond to this the soonest before the next possible loss of life and property in this beloved City of ours, Lilongwe City.
-98kx47waszq7

My Malawi My Views; MCP grappling with an exploding political bomb while DPP is nurturing its own cataclysmic political bomb

By Fletcher Simwaka

The main opposition Malawi Congress Party (MCP) may be grappling with an exploding political bomb now, but Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is nurturing its own cataclysmic political bomb.

Look, it’s now become abundantly clear that MCP vice president Richard Msowoya has fallen below the pecking order in the choice for MCP’s veep, let alone, running mate to President Lazarus Chakwera for the 2019 polls.

All Msowoya and his team are doing now is what any frustrated politician would do after an already lost battle to retain his veep’s position within the party.

It’s now a question of Msowoya reconciling with the brutal political reality that his ambition to become the country’s Vice President has hit a cul-de-sac.

How far Msowoya’s frustration will damage MCP chances in 2019 remains to be seen. Now, while political analysists are busy reading into MCP brewing wrangles, the Weekend Nation today has given us an impression of an even bigger political storm awaiting the DPP.

In the story, “UDF quagmire over 2019 poll”, there are smoldering frustrations among the UDF members over the party’s indecision to feature a presidential candidate in 2019.

According to the party’s spokesperson, UDF will not settle for the running-mate position. And Lucius Banda, Balaka North legislator, added, “If Atupele comes out of the DPP relationship, I will support him, but if he is not clear,

I will be forced to contest against him in order to save the party from dying.” This is bad news to DPP. Here is how. In an attempt to add numbers to its fold and fend off stiff competition from MCP, DPP is seriously banking on swallowing UDF and rest of its eastern region base.

They even extended a hand to PP but Joyce Banda has snubbed them. But would UDF campaign itself hoarse for DPP’s Peter Mutharika in return for a mere ministerial position for its leader, Atupele Muluzi? A position without any security?

The point is, Atupele hopes and thinks he has what it takes to be running-mate to Peter Mutharika in 2019. But while Mia is on course, Atupele has some political mountain within his party and DPP to overcome.

Will Lucius Banda, Ken Ndanga and the rest of UDF membership give Atupele a go-ahead to partner Peter Mutharika in 2019 polls? The other question could be, will the DPP gurus, accept Atupele to become running mate? Now, the most difficult question, will Peter Mutharika settle for Atupele at the expense of Saulos Chilima?

This is the dilemma awaiting Peter Mutharika and DPP. Sticking with Chilima will obvisouly leave Atupele frustrated.

Atupele will consequently be forced to stand as presidential candidate on the UDF ticket and deny Peter Mutharika the much-needed votes in the eastern region. And that will deal DPP chances of re-election in 2019 a shattering blow.

Imagine DPP without lower shire and eastern region vote versus Chakwera who will likely command a lead in the central and northern regions. But leaving out Chilima will also have its own consequences.

The Vice President could embark on a political move that could all but torpedo DPP’s chances.

After all, there is nothing wrong Chilima has done to deserve a snub from Peter Mutharika is 2019. So, yes, the Malawi Congress Party (MCP) may be grappling with an exploding political bomb now, but Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is nurturing its own cataclysmic political bomb.

McConnell, Schumer negotiating as short-term bill stalls and shutdown deadline nears

By Mike DeBonis, Ed O’Keefe, Erica Werner and Elise Viebeck-,Washington Post

The federal government shut down for the first time in more than four years Friday after senators rejected a temporary spending patch and bipartisan efforts to find an alternative fell short as a midnight deadline came and went.

Republican and Democratic leaders both said they would continue to talk, raising the possibility of a solution over the weekend. Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney said Friday that the conflict has a “really good chance” of being resolved before government offices open Monday, suggesting that a shutdown’s impacts could be limited.

But the White House drew a hard line immediately after midnight, saying they would not negotiate over a central issue — immigration — until government funding is restored.

“We will not negotiate the status of unlawful immigrants while Democrats hold our lawful citizens hostage over their reckless demands,” White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement. “This is the behavior of obstructionist losers, not legislators.

When Democrats start paying our armed forces and first responders we will reopen negotiations on immigration reform.”

Both parties confronted major political risks with 10 months to go until the midterm elections. Republicans resolved not to submit to the minority party’s demands to negotiate, while Democrats largely unified to use the shutdown deadline to force concessions on numerous issues — including protections for hundreds of thousands of young undocumented immigrants.

The standoff culminated in a late-night Senate vote that failed to clear a 60-vote hurdle, sending congressional leaders and President Trump back to the starting line after days of political posturing on all sides.

“A government shutdown was 100 percent avoidable. Completely avoidable. Now it is imminent,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said on the Senate floor following the vote. “Perhaps across the aisle some of our Democratic colleagues are feeling proud of themselves, but what has their filibuster accomplished? .?.?. The answer is simple: Their very own government shutdown.”

The early contours of the blame game appeared to cut against Trump and the Republicans, who control all levers of government but cannot pass major legislation without at least partial support from Senate Democrats. According to a Washington Post-ABC News poll, Americans said by a 20-point margin that they would blame a shutdown on Trump and the GOP rather than Democrats.

A government shutdown causing employee furloughs has never occurred under unified party control of Congress and the White House. Some furloughs of White House employees began immediately early Saturday.

One possible path out of the impasse appeared in wee hours: Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), leaving the Senate floor, said that he had secured an agreement from McConnell to bring a bipartisan bill addressing “dreamers” — young immigrants brought to the United States illegally as children — up for a vote.

Flake said he expected a short-term spending deal to be agreed to during Saturday’s Senate session, extending government funding through Feb. 8. By that same date, he said, McConnell would move to bring up the dreamer bill crafted by Sens. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) and Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.).

Flake had previously gotten a similar commitment from McConnell, but the majority leader insisted in recent days that any dreamer bill would have to be one Trump supported. Flake said he had urged him, and McConnell had agreed, not to wait on the president.

“At this point, we agree we can’t wait for the White House anymore,” Flake said.

A McConnell spokeswoman did not immediately comment Saturday morning on Flake’s account of a deal.

The midnight drama came after an unusually tranquil day inside the Capitol, where visible tensions remained at a low simmer as various parties undertook quiet talks to discuss ways to avoid the shutdown.

Republicans started the day eager to show a united front: House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) and McConnell met Friday morning, determined to hold firm to a strategy they had crafted nearly a week prior:
Make Democrats an offer they could not refuse by attaching a long-term extension of the Children’s Health Insurance Program, or CHIP, as well as the delay of some unpopular health-care taxes. And if they did refuse, the leaders believed, the public backlash would be intense — particularly in states where vulnerable Democratic senators are seeking reelection in November.

McConnell delivered a morning salvo on the Senate floor, declaring that Democrats had been led into a “box canyon” by Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.).

But by midday, McConnell’s strategy threatened to be upended by Trump — who phoned Schumer and invited him to the White House for a private meeting with no other congressional leaders.

That immediately raised Republicans’ suspicions on Capitol Hill that Trump might be tempted to cut a deal with his fellow New Yorker — much as he did in the early stages of a September standoff — that would undercut the GOP negotiating strategy and produce a deal that congressional conservatives could not stomach.

White House aides assured top congressional leaders that no deal would emerge from the meeting, that it was merely meant to gauge the posture of Schumer and the Democrats. Republicans exhaled when that turned out to be so.

Trump and Schumer talked over a cheeseburger lunch, according to a person familiar with their conversations, covering a wide range of contentious issues. Later on the Senate floor, Schumer described a meeting where he forged outlines of a potential deal with Trump, only to see it fall apart once he left the room.

“I reluctantly put the border wall on the table for discussion — even that was not enough to entice the president to finish the deal,” he said, adding: “What has transpired since that meeting in the Oval Office is indicative of the entire tumultuous and chaotic process Republicans have engaged in in the negotiations thus far. Even though President Trump seemed to like an outline of a deal in the room, he did not press his party in Congress to accept it.”

[Who is sent home during a shutdown?]

What ensued for the remainder of the afternoon was a silent standoff, as it became increasingly clear that Republicans would not be able to lure enough Democrats to pass their preferred funding patch.

For a few Democratic senators, a vote to spark a shutdown was too tough to swallow — even for Sen. Doug Jones of Alabama, who faced his first major political dilemma since winning a December special election in a campaign that emphasized his support for CHIP.

“I have made a strong commitment in my state to 150,000 children who need health insurance,” he said, announcing his decision to reporters late Friday.

He joined Democratic Sens. Joe Donnelly (Ind.), Joe Manchin III (W.Va.), Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), all of whom face tough paths to reelection in states that supported Trump in 2016 and voted to keep the government open.

But Michigan Sens. Gary Peters and Debbie Stabenow, meanwhile, announced they would both vote against the measure, bolstering the margin opposed to the bill. Four Republicans were also opposed: Sens. Flake, Mike Lee (Utah), Rand Paul (Ky.) and Lindsey O. Graham (S.C.).

Republicans spent much of the day attacking Democrats on several fronts — most frequently by pointing to a litany of critical statements Democratic leaders, including Schumer, had made slamming Republicans ahead of the 2013 shutdown.

In a 2013 ABC News interview, Schumer said, “You know we could do the same thing on immigration .?.?. We could say, ‘We’re shutting down the government. We’re not going to raise the debt ceiling until you pass immigration reform.’ It would be governmental chaos.”

“I think the longer it goes on, the more the American people see the hypocrisy on the Democratic side,” said Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.), a veteran of several shutdown dramas.

Democrats, meanwhile, pointed to other parts of the historical record — notably, a Trump tweet from May: “Our country needs a good “shutdown” in September to fix mess!”

Conservatives enthusiastically promoted the notion that Democrats were taking the government to the cusp of a shutdown to benefit undocumented immigrants, even a largely sympathetic subset. Democrats want legal status for dreamers in return for a spending agreement. That fight was prompted by Trump’s cancellation of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which is expected to take effect in March barring court challenges.

Numerous Republicans said they were perfectly comfortable waging the shutdown fight on those terms, though Democrats have sought to expand the playing field to other issues such as funding to combat opioid abuse and pension bailouts.

“Are Democrats going to shut the government .?.?. because we want basic reforms and enforcement measures that are going to prevent further flows of illegal immigrants and unskilled immigrants?” said Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), who is pushing for hard-line immigration policies in return for a DACA fix. “Seems to me like a tough position to win in light of the 2016 election.”

Marc Short, Trump’s director of legislative affairs, said that the effort by Democrats to put an immigration fix in the spending bill was unreasonable, given that legislative text has not been drafted and the program doesn’t expire until March.

“There’s no DACA bill to vote on, and there’s no emergency on the timing,” Short said.

The posturing took place mainly in front of reporters. Missing were the furious back-and-forth negotiations that preceded the 16-day shutdown in 2013, when Republican leaders sought to force a rollback of the Affordable Care Act and met several times with President Obama to seek an accommodation.

Shortly after 6 p.m., Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Tex.) looked at his watch and vented frustration.

“Government shuts down in what, five hours and 40 minutes? And there’s no solution? I don’t know whether Senator Schumer is just determined to take it down,” he said. “Obviously, we don’t want to shut the government down, either, but they seem to be determined to do so.”

Visibly, only Graham shuttled back and forth between the Republican and Democratic leadership offices, shopping a proposal to replace the four-week funding extension passed by the House with a slightly shorter one.

Schumer rejected a proposal that would have extended funding by three weeks, to Feb. 8, instead of four. Schumer floated a 10-day extension, which would have set another deadline just before Trump delivered his State of the Union address on Jan. 30. Shortly after midnight, McConnell closed the vote and declared an impasse.

The Trump administration worked up plans to keep national parks and monuments open despite a shutdown as a way to blunt public anger, and while the military would not cease to operate, troops would not be paid unless Congress specifically authorizes it.

In a sign of the preparations on Capitol Hill, congressional staffers received formal notice Friday morning that they may be furloughed starting at midnight. Individual lawmakers will have to determine which aides must report for work during the impasse.

Trump postponed a scheduled trip to his Florida resort, where he had scheduled a pricey fundraiser to mark his first anniversary in office. Ryan faced the cancellation of an official trip to Iraq, and House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and other lawmakers revisited plans to travel to Switzerland for the World Economic Forum.

The latter trip drove Democratic attacks earlier in the day, especially after McCarthy floated plans in the morning to send House members home for a planned week-long recess.

“They want to spend next week hobnobbing with their elitist friends instead of honoring their responsibilities to the American people,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif) said of Republicans.

Earlier in the night, around 150 protesters gathered outside the Capitol to hear Democrats promise not to back any spending deal that did not grant legal status to DACA recipients.

“This is a movement,” said Sen. Kamala D. Harris (D-Calif.). “We’re going to have some good days, and we’re going to have some bad days. And like every movement that has allowed our country to progress, we are going to have to fight.”

JZU Blames MCP Cracks on Poor Leadership

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-The former Malawi Congress Party (MCP) President John Tembo says disagreements in the party are increasing because the party is now full of inexperienced leaders.

Speaking in a Cruise Five program due to air on Zodiak TV, Tembo indicated he has been consulted by almost all leaders in the party on a number of issues but it is disheartening the wrangles continue.

He has advised the current leadership to submit fully to the party’s four cornerstones of unity, loyalty, obedience and discipline, warning failure to do so will result to a total downfall of the once might party.

Since after losing the 2014 elections there has been endless disagreements in the MCP, mainly on the roles of new comers and old timers.

The new leadership of Dr Lazarus Chakwera has been accused of nepotism, and favoring those that are new in the party, more especially with the coming of Sidik Mia.

Another notable disagreement has been between party secretary General Gustav Kaliwo and the leadership with the latter accusing the leader of violating the constitution on electing new leaders.

Recently the Party’s Vice President Richard Msowoya and second vice president MacDonold Lombala joined in the accusation.

Tembo attributes the endless disagreements to lack of proper knowledge of politics amongst the current leaders.

The former MCP leader told Cruise 5 Program on Zodiak TV to air this coming Sunday that it is very disheartening that things have reached this far besides him providing advice to some of the new leaders of the party.

MCP plans to hold its National Convention on March 25 with hope that all the disagreements will end with members electing leaders of their choice to drive the party through the 2019 polls.

Zimbabwe elections to be held in May or June

HARARE-(MaraviPost)-Zimbabwe’s president says elections will be in May or June, as he faces pressure at home and abroad to deliver a credible vote to cement his legitimacy.

President Emmerson Mnangagwa took power from longtime ruler Robert Mugabe with the military’s help in November. The state-run Herald newspaper quoted him Thursday as saying “Zimbabwe is going for elections in four to five months’ time” while on a visit to neighboring Mozambique.

That would be ahead of the timeframe stipulated in the constitution, which says elections should be between July 23 and Aug. 21. Mnangagwa had hinted they could be held earlier.

According to Veritas, a legal think tank, the president can circumvent the constitutionally stipulated timeline only if Parliament dissolves itself, necessitating early polls.

The ruling ZANU-PF party has the majority in Parliament.

Western countries, whose relations with Mugabe were hostile due to allegations of human rights abuses and electoral fraud, have insisted on credible elections.

The European Union’s ambassador to Zimbabwe, Philippe Van Damme, told journalists last week that free and fair elections will be a “huge step” in defining the southern African country’s re-engagement with the international community.

The EU and the United States, which still has sanctions against Mnangagwa for his past activities as a top Mugabe aide, are Zimbabwe’s biggest donors.

“We will ensure that Zimbabwe delivers free, credible, fair and indisputable elections to ensure Zimbabwe engages the world as a qualified democratic state,” the Herald quotes Mnangagwa as saying in Mozambique.

The new president in recent weeks has intensified outreach to neighboring countries, which he has described as “an important step in building a new, prosperous and democratic Zimbabwe.”

Mnangagwa travels to Davos, Switzerland next week for the World Economic Forum, the first time a Zimbabwean president will attend the meeting. A visit to China is planned for April, according to his office.

At home, he is reaching out through social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook, forums scorned by Mugabe, and has visited the country’s main opposition leader.

Mnangagwa faces huge economic challenges in once-prosperous Zimbabwe, such as severe cash shortages and dramatic price increases of food and other household items.

North Korea imposes more demands on South Korea over the Olympics

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is huddling Tuesday with nations that fought on America’s side in the Korean War, looking to increase economic pressure on North Korea over its nuclear weapons even as hopes rise for diplomacy. (Jan. 16)

A week after North Korea said it would send a delegation to next month’s Winter Olympics in South Korea, the regime’s demands have taken on a sinister pattern.

Reports emerged Tuesday that North Korea demanded the South return defectors who fled the totalitarian regime. That came after requiring that South Korea pay the North’s Olympic costs and an agreement by the United States and South Korea to suspend a planned joint military exercise.

The demands came to light since last week’s talks between North and South Korea — the first sit-down between the two countries in more than two years.

“This is why all those crotchety hawks evinced such skepticism at North Korea’s talks,” tweeted Robert Kelly, a professor of political science at Pusan National University in South Korea. “We all saw this coming.”

The South Korean newspaper The Chosun Ilbo reported Tuesday that the North demanded the return of 12 women who escaped in 2016 from their jobs at restaurant in Ningbo, China, a demand the paper said the South is legally bound to refuse.

South Korea’s government said the timing is too sensitive to comment, the newspaper said.

The North has warned that it will not agree to more reunions for families split by the Korean War unless the defectors, and another woman who fled from elsewhere, are returned.

The talks last week occurred after the U.S. agreed to South Korea’s request to postpone a large military exercise, which usually involves 30,000 American troops and 200,000 South Koreans, until after the Olympics are held Feb. 9-25. in Pyeongchang, South Korea.

On Friday,a North Korean state-run publication issued a demand for a “permanent halt” to U.S.-South Korean military drills while inter-Korean talks continue, according to The Strait Times of Singapore.

“Inter-Korean talks and war drill can never be compatible,” the North Korean publication, Uriminzokkiri, declared.

North Korea, which is under sanctions by the United Nations and U.S. aimed at ending its nuclear weapon and ballistic missile programs, also succeeded in getting South Korea to agree to fund its Olympic delegation, which will include as many as 500 athletes, performers, officials and reporters, according to The Hankyoreh, a South Korean online publication.

South Korea will pay the entire delegation’s expenses, said author and Korea analyst Gordon Chang.

“This is typical. (North Korean leader Kim Jong Un’s) family playbook goes back several decades,” Chang said. “First they refuse to talk to South Korea. Then they make a bold overture. Next comes demands and then they throw a tantrum.”

If the Trump administration puts enough pressure on North Korea, the Kim family might agree it has no choice but to disarm, Chang said. But the White House has yet to impose sanctions where they would be most effective — on its top two trading partners, China and Russia, he added.

The North Korean demands were revealed as Secretary of State Rex Tillerson met Tuesday in Vancouver with foreign ministers from 20 nations that sided with the U.S. during the Korean War, which ended in 1953, to discuss how to pressure North Korea to quit its nuclear weapons and missile programs.

“We must increase the costs of the regime’s behavior to the point that North Korea must come to the table for credible negotiations,” Tillerson said in his opening comments.

Tillerson called for interdiction operations at sea to

US President Trump’s ex-chief strategist Steve Bannon refuses to answer at Congress hearing on Russia

WASHINGTON-(MaraviPost)-Steve Bannon, ex-chief strategist to US President Donald Trump, has refused to answer a broad range of questions at a committee hearing probing alleged links between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Bannon had been called to testify in front of the House Intelligence Committee about his time working for Mr Trump.

He was questioned behind closed doors on Tuesday in a 10-hour meeting. A Democrat on the committee believes he was under a White House “gag order”.

Representative Adam Schiff said that Mr Bannon’s lawyer had cited “executive privilege” – which allows the president to keep information from the public.

“Steve Bannon and his attorney asserted a remarkably broad definition of executive privilege,” Jim Himes, a Democratic member of the committee, told CNN.

The committee issued a subpoena for him to return for a second round. His first appearance was voluntary and Bannon’s representatives have made no comment.

Zimbabwe ruling Zanu-PF fires 11 Robert Mugabe allies from parliament

HARARE-(MaraviPost)-Zimbabwe’s ruling ZANU-PF party has fired 11 parliamentarians, friends of former leader Robert Mugabe, as President Emmerson Mnangagwa continues a purge of officials that publicly supported Mugabe and his wife, media reports said on Friday.

Mnangagwa, who came to power in November 2017 after 93-year-old Mugabe was forced to resign following a defacto military coup, has spoken against retribution.

Zimbabwe President Emmerson Mnangagwa.

However, local media reports say a ZANU-PF restructuring process around the country was targeting those who publicly backed Mugabe and Grace, whose tilt at power resulted in the military intervention.

According to a transcript of parliament procedures from Thursday, the Parliament Deputy Speaker, Mabel Chinomona, said that ZANU-PF had notified the house of assembly that the 11 no longer represented its interest, triggering their dismissal.

Some of the legislators were cabinet ministers in Mugabe’s government.

In November ZANU-PF fired five top Mugabe allies from parliament, including Jonathan Moyo, a fiercely combative mouthpiece for a faction that backed Grace Mugabe’s rise.

Many of Mugabe’s political allies were either arrested by the military in a series of spectacular raids in the early hours of Nov. 15 or fled to neighbouring countries.

In private, Mnangagwa’s allies worry that some of Mugabe’s supporters could regroup and campaign against the new president in elections that will be held in four to five months.

Moyo had said that the international community must help remove the “military government” that has taken power or risk the country descending into chaos.