The recent presidential debate held at Bingu International Conference Hall was touted as a pivotal moment for Malawi’s political landscape.

However, the conspicuous absence of two heavyweight contenders—President Lazarus Chakwera of MCP and Professor Arthur Peter Mutharika of DPP—casts a long shadow over the event’s relevance and credibility. While three parties—UTM, PP, and UDF—along with their leaders Dalitso Kabambe, Joyce Banda, and Atupele Muluzi, took to the stage to articulate their visions, it was clear that these figures are not the true powerhouses to watch.

The hard truth is that the debate was unnecessary for a seasoned leader like Mutharika, whose legacy and political stamina speak volumes beyond any staged forum.

Professor Arthur Peter Mutharika’s absence was not a dereliction of political duty but a calculated move grounded in confidence.

His decades-long footprint in Malawian politics, from his tenure as President to his impactful legal career, has earned him a reservoir of respect and a proven track record.

The debate, primarily designed as a platform for lesser-known candidates to boost their visibility, offered nothing new for Mutharika to prove.

His legacy of steady governance, economic initiatives, and diplomatic acumen has already carved a distinct place in the voters’ minds.

This is not to mention the recent whirlwind whistle-stop tours in Lilongwe and Mzuzu that drew mammoth crowds, dispelling earlier false narratives pushed by MCP that he was frail or incapable. This show of strength sent shockwaves through MCP’s supposed strongholds, reaffirming that Mutharika remains as fit as ever—both physically and politically.

In stark contrast, President Lazarus Chakwera’s decision to snub the debate reeks of fear and shame.

The hard truth is that Chakwera’s failure to participate was an admission of his inability to defend a dismal record. It was through similar debates that he made lofty promises to Malawians, pledges that have since evaporated into thin air.

His absence is a clear attempt to avoid the tough questions that organizers would inevitably raise—questions about unfulfilled commitments, economic hardships, and governance failures. Chakwera’s retreat from the debate stage is not a sign of strength but a desperate bid to avoid embarrassment and public scrutiny.

This cowardice undermines his credibility and signals a leader unwilling to be held accountable.

As for the trio who participated in the debate—Kabambe, Banda, and Muluzi—their presence was more about selling themselves than presenting a serious challenge. While each has their own political ambitions, none possess the gravitas or widespread support to be considered a force to reckon with in this election.

Their visions, though articulated with enthusiasm, lack the depth and experience that Malawi’s current challenges demand. The hard truth is that these candidates are largely political novices trying to capitalize on the vacuum created by the absence of the true heavyweight contenders.

Their debate performances, while spirited, fail to move the needle in a meaningful way for the electorate.

Moreover, the narrative spun by MCP that Mutharika was too ill to campaign or engage with the public has been thoroughly debunked by his energetic and well-attended rallies.

The sheer size and enthusiasm of the crowds in key cities like Lilongwe and Mzuzu are undeniable proof that Mutharika remains a potent political force.

These events did more than just rally supporters—they sent a clear message that MCP’s grip on its strongholds is loosening and that Mutharika’s influence is resurging with renewed vigor.

The hard truth is that political opponents can no longer use baseless health rumors to discredit Mutharika, as his public appearances have shattered those myths once and for all.

The debate was an exercise in futility without the participation of the two major contenders—Mutharika and Chakwera.

Mutharika’s strategic absence was a demonstration of his confidence and legacy, while Chakwera’s withdrawal exposed his inability to face tough questions about his administration’s shortcomings.

The other candidates, though eager, remain peripheral players in a political game dominated by these two giants.

As Malawi approaches a critical electoral juncture, it is clear that Mutharika’s resilience, proven record, and revitalized public support make him the candidate to watch, while Chakwera’s retreat only highlights his growing vulnerabilities.

The hard truth is that Malawi’s future hinges on leadership that stands firm in the public eye, and Mutharika has shown he is ready to lead with strength and dignity.

Feedback: 099 208 24 24

Email: jonesgadama@gmail.com