Tag Archives: Amaryllis Hotel purchase probe

Human Rights, Law and order

PAC chair Malondera slams Acting ACB chief, Kamangira’s interferences in response to HRCC demand

MaraviPost Leave a comment

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-Parliamentary Committee on Public Accounts (PAC) chairperson Steven Malondera has lodged complaints against Acting Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) Gabriel Chembezi and Alexious Kamangila for interfering the committee’s probe in the ongoing Amaryllis Hotel purchase saga.

PAC chairperson Malondera is responding to Human Rights Consultative Committee (HRCC) letter which the the grouping wrote to PAC demanding immediate formal reporting and legal action over allegations of improper influence linked to a parliamentary inquiry.

In a letter dated April 20, 2026, signed by HRCC Board Chairperson Robert Mkwezalamba, the organization says it is treating the matter with “utmost urgency and seriousness” following public claims involving lawyer Alexious Kamangira and the alleged purchase of Amaryllis Hotel.

HRCC notes that Kamangira has publicly accused Malondera of receiving money to influence the outcome of a parliamentary investigation, claims which the PAC chairperson has disputed.

According to HRCC, Malondera had in turn alleged that Kamangira has been persistently contacting him in an attempt to influence decisions aimed at protecting the Acting Director General of the Anti Corruption Bureau (ACB).

The rights body says the allegations and counter allegations raise serious concerns including possible corruption, abuse of public office and interference in parliamentary processes.

HRCC has further warned that the developments risk eroding public trust in Parliament and other oversight institutions if not handled transparently and lawfully.

Citing provisions under the Corrupt Practices Act and the Penal Code, HRCC says both influencing and attempting to influence a public officer constitute criminal offences under Malawian law.

The organization has also pointed to the Parliamentary Privileges and Powers Act, warning that any interference in parliamentary proceedings could amount to contempt of Parliament and attract sanctions.

HRCC says by placing the matter in the public domain, Malondera has triggered expectations for formal reporting and decisive institutional action.

The committee has since called on Malondera to lodge a formal complaint against Kamangira with the Anti-Corruption Bureau, the Malawi Police Service and the Office of the Speaker of Parliament.

It has also urged the PAC chairperson to submit all supporting evidence including communication records, witnesses and any documentation that can substantiate his claims.

HRCC has warned that failure to act may force the body to petition law enforcement agencies to independently investigate the matter and refer it to Parliament as a possible breach of constitutional and statutory duties.

The organization has further indicated it may publicly push for Malondera’s accountability including possible removal from his position, if the matter is not addressed.

HRCC Board Chairperson Robert Mkwezalamba has since stressed that the issue goes beyond personal disputes, describing it as one that strikes at the heart of parliamentary integrity and the fight against corruption.

The body has given Malondera seven days to act, emphasizing that allegations of such magnitude must move from public rhetoric to formal legal processes.

But in a leaked document dated April 22, 2025 which Malondera has confirmed its authentic, PAC chairperson has raised a series of allegations of undue influence, abuse of office, and corrupt conduct against Chembezi.

The allegations are contained in a letter which Malondera has written Chembezi and coped to several high offices including the President, the Speaker of Parliament and the Malawi Law Society.

Here are ten key points from the letter:

1. Solicitation of Favorable Outcome: Chembezi allegedly requested that Kamsiyamo “clear” him in the PAC inquiry into the Amaryllis transaction in order to secure his substantive appointment as ACB Director General.

2. Request for Protection During Inquiry: On 12 March 2026, just before appearing before the PAC inquiry, Chembezi allegedly called Kamsiyamo seeking assurances that he would be “protected” during his testimony.

3. Unsolicited Private Engagements: The complaint alleges Chembezi initiated multiple private and informal meetings, including at a private residence (Africa House) and inside Kamsiyamo’s vehicle, to discuss matters related to the ongoing inquiry.

4. Alleged Quid Pro Quo Involving ACB Dockets: Chembezi is accused of suggesting he could assist Hon. Eisenhower Mkaka in an ACB matter if Kamsiyamo supported efforts to “clear” him in the PAC inquiry.

5. Attempted Use of Official Resources: Chembezi allegedly offered to fuel Kamsiyamo’s private vehicle using an official ACB fuel card, an offer that was declined.

6. Use of Investigative Files as Leverage: The complaint states that Chembezi presented a docket involving Hon. Bester Awali on maize distribution, which Kamsiyamo interpreted as an attempt to exert pressure using active investigations.

7. Alleged Threat of Selective Prosecution: Chembezi reportedly presented allegations of financial misconduct involving K1.1 billion linked to Kamsiyamo’s past role as Deputy Minister, which the complainant views as retaliatory pressure after refusing to influence the inquiry.

8. Offer to Influence Other High-Profile Cases: Chembezi allegedly suggested he could “clear” the Leader of Opposition in relation to the Greenbelt Initiative as a “token of appreciation” if Kamsiyamo assisted in clearing him.

9. Conflict of Interest Concerns: The complaint further raises concerns over Chembezi’s conduct in relation to a sale agreement involving the Public Service Pension Trust Fund while serving as Acting Director General of the ACB.

10. Use of Third-Party Emissary: Kamsiyamo alleges that Chembezi engaged Mr. Alexius Kamangila as an intermediary, who allegedly threatened to publicly delegitimize Kamsiyamo and the PAC if he did not clear Chembezi.

Chembezi is yet to respond on the complaints raised against him.


corruption, Opinion, Politics

Hotel probe sparks concerns of corruption, accountability

Burnett Munthali Leave a comment

The recent report into the Amaryllis Hotel purchase has sent shockwaves across Malawi, naming influencers and recommending administrative, civil, and criminal proceedings against those involved.

This development has raised concerns about corruption and the misuse of public funds, highlighting the need for greater accountability in government and business dealings.

The report’s findings are likely to put pressure on the government to take decisive action against those implicated, including high-profile individuals who may have used their influence to benefit from the transaction.

Sharp Focus is on the government’s response to this scandal.

Will they rise to the challenge and demonstrate their commitment to accountability, or will this be another missed opportunity to tackle corruption?

Section 13 of the Constitution of Malawi emphasizes the importance of transparency and accountability in public office, stating that “The State shall promote and protect the welfare and development of the people of Malawi by creating and maintaining conditions conducive to good government and democracy.”

The current situation demands careful handling to ensure justice is served and public trust is restored.

The Malawi Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) has been vocal about the need for accountability in public office, and this report presents an opportunity for the agency to demonstrate its effectiveness.

The ACB must ensure that investigations are thorough and that those implicated are held accountable, regardless of their position or influence.

As the nation watches closely, many are calling for transparency and fairness in the investigation, emphasizing that no one should be above the law.

The outcome of this probe could set a precedent for how Malawi handles corruption cases, potentially impacting the country’s investment climate and reputation.

The government must act swiftly to address the concerns raised by this report, ensuring that those responsible are held accountable and that public funds are protected.

Anything less would undermine the rule of law and perpetuate a culture of impunity.

In the coming weeks, the eyes of Malawians will be on the authorities as they navigate this complex situation.

Will they rise to the challenge and demonstrate their commitment to accountability, or will this be another missed opportunity to tackle corruption?

Malawi’s former top official faces arrest warrant over Amaryllis Hotel scandal

Malawi’s former Secretary to the President and Cabinet, Colleen Zamba, is embroiled in a legal battle over her arrest warrant, as she faces allegations of money laundering and abuse of office linked to the K128.7 billion purchase of Amaryllis Hotel.

Zamba’s legal team has challenged the warrant, arguing that she is being “victimized” and that the State should have used a summons instead.

Sharp Focus is on the accountability of high-ranking officials, and whether the rule of law will be upheld in this case. Section 15 of the Constitution of Malawi states that “All persons are equal before the law and have the right to equal protection of the law.”

The situation demands careful handling to ensure that justice is served and that the rule of law is upheld.

Zamba’s case is the latest in a series of legal issues, including previous arrests for illegal recruitment practices and conspiracy.

Her lawyer, George Kadzipatike, argues that the State is “victimizing” her and that the warrants are a form of pre-trial punishment.

The outcome of this case will likely have significant implications for Malawi’s anti-corruption efforts and the accountability of high-ranking officials.

As the nation watches closely, many are calling for transparency and fairness in the investigation, emphasizing that no one should be above the law.

The situation is a test of Malawi’s commitment to accountability and the rule of law.

Feedback;
Mobile: +265884433313
Email: bonnetmunthali2101@gmail.com

corruption, Malawi

Leaked Parley report hangs AG Mbeta, ACB chief Chembezi, others in Amaryllis Hotel purchase probe

MaraviPost Leave a comment

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-The leaked Public Appointments Committee of Parliament (PAC) has faulted country’s Head of Bar, Attorney General Frank Mbeta for allowing the Board to proceed with the sale of Amaryllis hotel against the professional advice from the Reserve Bank of Malawi and others.

According to the leaked report on bullet 4.7.2 which is under Condition Advice and Its Practice Affect, PAC says AG framed his advice as conditional, indicating that the Board could proceed only after being satisfied. It has however found that in practical terms, his advice was interpreted and relied upon a clearance to proceed.

The use of directive language – suggesting that the Board “should proceed” upon satisfying the stated condition- created an impression that the legal barriers to the transaction had been resolved.

With this type of advice, PAC is of the view that Frank Farouk Mbeta operated not as a cautionary guide but as a facilitating endorsement of the transaction.

PAC recommended that in relation to the investigation and advisory processes be clearly established and be subjected to appropriate extensive investigation.

“Where any gaps in accountability or oversight are identified appropriate measures be taken to ensure that all individuals involved like the rest are subjected to equal and transparent scrutiny,” the report further says

ON ACB Boss, Gabriel Chembezi

The Committee recommended that Counsel Gabriel Chembezi be temporarily suspended as Acting Director of ACB and that an independent inquiry be instituted into his conduct, particularly regarding his presence at a meeting in which he sale agreement was discussed in a consultative capacity and his subsequent role in overseeing or influencing investigation into the same transaction.

ON Counsel Chizaso Nyirongo

The Committee recommended that he be subjected to a comprehensive investigation to determine whether his conduct was both at the OPC and Cabinet and subsequent as Chairperson of the Board of Trustees, constituted abuse of office, conflict of interest or breach of fiduciary duty.

PAC has since asked the current OPC to examine his role in advancing the transaction at OPC’s Cleveland later presiding over its approval, his influence in appointing key officers and engagement of advisors and the decision to proceed with transaction notwithstanding regulatory directives.

The President should act on all public officers including the Acting Director General and the Attorney General, for independent further investigations regarding their role and conduct in the whole matter.

But PAC chairperson Steven Malondera on Wednesday told Parliament that the inquiry will be extended to a month to include other key individuals including former Secretary to the President and Cabinet (SPC) Colleen Zamba and Amaryllis Hotel owners.

corruption, Malawi

Parley Chair Malondera accuses whistleblower Kamangila of trying to influence Amaryllis Hotel Inquiry

MaraviPost Leave a comment

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-The Chairperson of Malawi’s Public Accounts Committee (PAC), Steve Malondera, has accused lawyer Alex Kamangira of attempting to influence the outcome of the committee’s inquiry into the Amaryllis Hotel purchase.

Malondera was responding to a complaint Kamangira made to the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB), requesting an investigation into an alleged K65 million payout to the committee aimed at swaying the inquiry’s outcome.

The complaint has sparked a heated exchange between the two, with Malondera alleging that Kamangira’s actions are an attempt to undermine the committee’s work.

Malondera said he had clearly told Kamangira that the nation was watching the inquiry and expected accountability, and that it was unacceptable for him to personally clear anyone involved in the Amaryllis Hotel deal.

Malondera’s comments suggest that Kamangira’s involvement has raised concerns about potential interference in the inquiry.

Malondera alleged that Kamangira had demanded access to the report, but he had refused, citing the need to maintain the committee’s independence.

He claimed to have evidence of a message Kamangira sent, which he would use to confront the lawyer publicly at an appropriate time.

The PAC chairperson emphasized that it was unacceptable for anyone to try to influence a committee inquiry to protect friends or cronies.

He said many of the questions Kamangira raised in a WhatsApp call had already been asked by other committee members during the Attorney General’s appearance, suggesting that the lawyer’s involvement was unnecessary.

The ACB has acknowledged receipt of Kamangira’s claims, indicating that an investigation may be launched into the alleged K65 million payout.

The development has added to the controversy surrounding the Amaryllis Hotel inquiry, which has been marred by allegations of impropriety and corruption.

The inquiry is ongoing, and Malondera has vowed to ensure that those responsible for any wrongdoing are held accountable.

The outcome of the inquiry is eagerly awaited, with many Malawians calling for transparency and accountability in government dealings.

corruption, Politics

Parley bows down to public’ pressure to extend Amaryllis Hotel purchase probe

MaraviPost Leave a comment

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) of Parliament has resolved to extend its work by one month to allow engagement with stakeholders who were not initially consulted in the Amaryllis Hotel inquiry.

The committee is investigating the Public Service Pension Trust Fund’s MK128.7 billion acquisition of the Amaryllis Hotel.

On Tuesday, the government side said it would not allow the committee to present its report without first summoning former Secretary to the President and Cabinet Colleen Zamba, along with officials from Yusuf Investment.

PAC Chairperson Steven Malondera said there has been a lot of background noise surrounding the matter and indicated he had been advised not to comment further.

He maintained that the committee acted within its mandate and did not misbehave.

He said the committee expects to complete its work after the additional month, describing proposals to form an ad hoc committee to continue the inquiry as unfair.

corruption, Malawi

Parley chairperson Steven Malondera exposed in bribery act: Amaryllis Hotel purchase probe

MaraviPost Leave a comment

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-A Malawian lawyer, Alexious Kamangira, has petitioned the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) to investigate Steve Baba Malondera, Chairperson of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), over allegations of bribery linked to the Amaryllis Hotel deal.

Kamangira claims Malondera received K65 million to influence the committee’s findings, with only K1 million allegedly distributed to each member.

The allegations have sparked concerns about transparency and accountability in public financial management, with Kamangira calling for Malondera’s resignation and an independent investigation.

Malondera has denied the allegations, stating he hasn’t received any money related to the inquiry.

The Amaryllis Hotel deal has attracted significant public interest, with the PAC inquiry already facing criticism for proceeding without key witness Colleen Zamba’s testimony.

The government has questioned the inquiry’s completeness, citing Zamba’s absence and lack of testimony from the hotel’s seller, Yusuf Investments Limited.

corruption, Opinion, Politics

Why Parley must not proceed without Colleen Zamba’s testimony in Amaryllis Hotel purchase probe?

Jones Gadama

BLANTYRE-(MaraviPost)-The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) of Malawi’s Parliament sits at a pivotal moment in its oversight role.

The committee’s plan to submit its report to Parliament without the testimony of Colleen Zamba, a key witness with crucial information, raises significant questions about procedural fairness, the integrity of the investigative process, and ultimately, the pursuit of justice for the Malawian people.

Zamba’s repeated failure to appear before the PAC, citing medical reasons while also failing to provide medical documentation, complicates the situation.

Yet, despite these challenges, it is imperative for the PAC to either wait until Zamba can present her testimony or, at the very least, facilitate her participation through virtual means before moving forward.

Proceeding without her testimony risks undermining the credibility of the committee’s work and doing a disservice to the nation.

At the heart of this issue is the principle of thoroughness in parliamentary oversight. The PAC’s role is to scrutinize public spending and ensure accountability within government operations.

This responsibility demands that all relevant evidence is considered before drawing conclusions or making recommendations.

Colleen Zamba’s information is described as crucial, suggesting that her testimony could provide key insights or even pivotal evidence that might influence the committee’s findings.

To bypass such testimony risks producing an incomplete report, potentially overlooking critical facts that could alter the committee’s understanding of the matter at hand.

Moreover, justice is not just about speed or efficiency; it is about fairness and accuracy.

By submitting the report without Zamba’s input, the PAC could be perceived as rushing to judgment or prioritizing expediency over a comprehensive investigation.

This perception can damage public trust in parliamentary processes and feed narratives of partiality or negligence.

Malawi’s citizens deserve transparency and thoroughness, especially in matters concerning public funds and governance.

The PAC’s report, as a public document, should reflect the fullest possible account of facts — including every relevant testimony.

The issue of Zamba citing medical reasons for her absence, yet failing to provide medical documentation, introduces an element of complexity.

On one hand, it is important to respect genuine health concerns. No one should be compelled to testify while incapacitated or seriously ill.

On the other hand, accountability also requires verification.

The committee, and the public it serves, have a right to understand the circumstances behind repeated absences to ensure that excuses are not being abused to avoid scrutiny.

This lack of medical proof fuels skepticism and leaves the committee in a difficult position: whether to trust unverified claims or to insist on some form of proof before deciding on next steps.

In this context, modern technology offers a practical solution that balances empathy for health concerns with the need for testimony.

Virtual meetings and video conferencing have become standard tools worldwide, especially in situations where physical presence is difficult.

The PAC could facilitate a virtual hearing that allows Zamba to present her evidence without the need to travel or compromise her health.

This approach would demonstrate flexibility, respect for the witness’s condition, and a commitment to thorough fact-finding.

It would also signal to the public that the committee is making every effort to ensure that no stone is left unturned before finalizing its report.

Ignoring this option and proceeding without Zamba’s testimony could lead to several adverse outcomes. First, it invites critiques of the PAC’s report as incomplete or biased, undermining the report’s influence and authority.

Second, it risks encouraging other witnesses to avoid appearances, knowing that the committee might not insist on their participation.

This could weaken future investigations and erode the culture of accountability.

Third, it may deny the Malawian public the full truth, which is essential for informed debate, policy formulation, and ultimately, democratic governance.

The PAC’s decision also carries a broader symbolic weight.

Public institutions must demonstrate that they value due process and integrity above all.

When key witnesses are unable or unwilling to participate, the institution’s response reveals its true commitment to justice.

By holding on and ensuring that Zamba’s testimony is heard—whether in person or virtually—the PAC would affirm its role as a guardian of accountability and a champion of thorough, fair investigations.

While the urgency to present findings and move forward is understandable, it should never come at the cost of excluding critical testimony.

Colleen Zamba’s contribution to the Public Accounts Committee’s inquiry is too important to overlook.

The committee must exercise patience and creativity, leveraging virtual technologies if necessary, to hear her out.

This approach ensures that the final report will be comprehensive, credible, and just.

It will uphold the values of transparency and accountability that the people of Malawi expect and deserve.

To do otherwise would be to compromise the very purpose of parliamentary oversight and to risk doing an injustice far greater than any delay could cause.

The PAC stands at a crossroads, and the path to true justice demands that Zamba’s voice be heard before the report sees the light of day.

corruption, Politics

Embattled former SPC Colleen Zamba dodges Parley on Amaryllis Hotel purchase probe: But where is she exactly?

MaraviPost

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-The embattled former former Secretary to President and Cabinet Colleen Zamba has again failed to appear appear before Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee (PAC) on Monday, March 30, 2026 in the ongoing Amaryllis Hotel purchase inquiry.

PAC chairperson Steven Malondera told the committee that Zamba lawyer George Jivason Kadzipatike communicated to Parliament that the former SPC could not appear before the chamber she remains outside the country receiving medical treatment.

According to Malondera, the letter summoning Zamba only reached her on March 25, 2026, while she was already outside the country.

In the latter, PAC required her to submit certain documents by March 27, 2026.

But in a letter dated March 26, 2026, addressed to the Clerk of Parliament, Zamba was unable to comply.

“Our client is currently attending to medical treatment outside the country and she is therefore neither able to appear before the Public Accounts Committee on 30th March, 2026 nor to provide documentation within such a short period,” Kadzipatike wrote.

Kadzipatike said Zamba’s return depends on how her treatment progresses.

“We are not sure when she will be back because it depends on how the treatment goes,” he said.

He added that Zamba remains committed to appearing before the committee and will arrange for a mutually acceptable date once she returns.

But Malondera told the committee that there is no medical report from Zamba legal team to support the claims.

PAC chairperson therefore assured the nation will conclude the probe in the best interests of Malawians and that “Will not buy Zamba’s excuse on probe”.

But where is Zamba?

Unverified information told this publication that Zamba has relocated to South Africa and that will not return soon unless the country’s laws are enforced to expedite her to Malawi.

This publication will give more details on Zamba’s whereabouts.

The former SPC is answering numerous charges including abuse of power, office while serving former President Lazarus Chakwera.

Human Rights

“Mwanamveka, Treasury must appear before PAC in Amaryllis Hotel probe”-Human Rights activist Chimwemwe Mhango

MaraviPost

….Asks why former SPC Zamba is abroad amid the inquiry

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-One of the country’s Human rights activists Chimwemwe Mbeya Mhango Ntchindi is calling upon Parliamentary Committee on Public Accounts (PAC) to invite Finance Minister Joseph Mwanamveka and Treasury to appear before the committee in the ongoing Amaryllis Hotel purchase probe.

Mhango observes that Mwanamveka and Secretary to the Treasury (ST) are reliable to answer some questions pertaining to payments made on the hotel purchase despite legal advise which Attorney General (AG) Frank Mbeta provided.

Mbeta told PAC on Wednesday that his office advised Public Pension Trust Fund to review all contentious issues before proceeding with the purchase “But instead Fund’s board proceeded with purchase and made payments”.

In his reaction, Human Rights activist Mhango observed that MK90 billion out of MK128 billion could not be released without full knowledge of Finance Minister and ST hence the need for them to appear before PAC.

“The position of AG Mbeta is clear that his role was to provide legal advice as mandated by the law.

“But why did the Fund’s board proceed with the purchase and made payment without firstly working on pressing issues in the sale including high prices?, queries Mhango.

The activist adds, “The payment could not be released or made without knowledgement of Ministry of Finance and Treasury.

“Both Minister of Finance Mwanamveka and ST must face PAC as to why they allowed such payments despite all indicators that Hotel purchase was not worth it”.

Mhango explains further, “Let’s deal with all key individuals, agencies that pushed the purchase of the hotel.

“One thing coming out very clearing is that there was heavy political interference in the purchase of the hotel which must be tamed in saving public service work”.

The activist however is not surprised with former Secretary to the President and Cabinet Colleen Zamba’ name all over in the hotel purchase inquiry.

“Zamba was running the affairs of the state while making executive decisions with or without former President Lazarus Chakwera’s acknowledgement.

“This political interference in public service must be stopped. All arms of government must work independently for efficiency of public service”.

Mhango however questions the legality of allowing Zamba to enjoy foreign trips amid serious nations matter that require her presence.

“We know clearly that suspects have rights to travel with courts permission. But looking at the intensity of the matter at hard, was the court really need to allow her to travel while PAC need her for questioning?

“Our courts must serve the interests of the people not individuals who have money. Zamba must be in Malawi to answer many questions on how she used her office as SPC”.

PAC is yet to make communication on specific date when Zamba will appear before the Committee.

Law and order, Malawi

Mbeta blasts media for distorting his role in Amaryllis Hotel Purchase saga

MaraviPost

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-Attorney General (AG) Frank Mbeta has accused the media of misrepresenting his role in the controversial acquisition of Amaryllis Hotel and has told MPs that he never authorised or endorsed the purchase, a claim that has sparked a war of words with journalists.

Mbeta was appearing before the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) where he said reports that suggested his office gave a green light to the MK128.7 billion deal were false, and he was determined to set the record straight.

“I did not authorise or endorse the purchase,” Mbeta told the committee, his voice firm and resolute as he sought to distance himself from the contentious deal.

He then read from his letter of December 20, 2025, to show that his advice was conditional, a move that seemed to catch some committee members off guard.

“I advised the board to review the risks and ensure compliance with prudent investment principles and regulatory requirements before proceeding with the transaction,” Mbeta said, emphasising the cautious approach he had taken.

The Attorney General said the final decision was always for the Board of Trustees of the Public Service Pension Trust Fund (PSPTF), which has absolute discretion under the trust deed and pension laws, a point he seemed keen to stress.

A report from the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) and another from the Reserve Bank of Malawi (RBM) found no evidence of corruption but pointed to prudential issues relating to sound financial management, a finding that has raised more questions than answers.

Mbeta told MPs that his advice was based on those findings and that he had simply reminded the board of its fiduciary obligations, a claim that has sparked debate on the level of accountability.

“My role is to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. Commercial issues are outside my mandate,” said Mbeta, seemingly trying to deflect criticism.

He added that his advice required the board to satisfy itself that all conditions were met before proceeding, something he said some media reports had ignored, a claim that has sparked a heated debate on the role of the media in scrutinising government actions.