Tag Archives: Civil Society Organizations (CSOs)

CSOs demand urgent reforms from MEC to safeguard Malawi’s 2025 Elections

By Burnett Munthali

Malawi’s 2025 General Elections have become a focal point for Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), who are now demanding urgent reforms from the Malawi Electoral Commission (MEC).

In a joint letter addressed to MEC Chairperson Justice Dr. Anabel Mtalimanja and the Commissioners, the CSOs voiced serious concerns over the integrity and preparedness of the electoral process.

Their message, titled “Urgent Appeal for Electoral Transparency, Accountability, and Credibility in the 2025 General Elections,” emphasizes their nonpartisan stance, describing their efforts as a patriotic duty to defend democracy.

With the elections scheduled for September 16, 2025, the CSOs said Malawi is at a critical juncture requiring decisive action to protect the people’s will.

They pointed to alarming irregularities in the ongoing voter verification exercise, including missing names, wrong centers, and unexplained deletions, which they say are fueling public mistrust and disenfranchisement.

The organizations attributed many of these problems to the deployment of electronic voting systems, which they argue have a controversial global reputation that casts doubt on electoral transparency.

According to the CSOs, Malawians have overwhelmingly rejected electronic voting system, and its continued use threatens the credibility of the entire process.

They insist that every vote must be protected, demanding immediate action from MEC across several key areas.

First, they called for an immediate independent audit of the voter roll, with results made public, and an extended opportunity for voters to correct their information.

Second, they demanded the full rejection of system and urged MEC to adopt election technologies that are secure, independently verifiable, and trusted by all stakeholders.

Third, the CSOs proposed the involvement of independent local and international auditors to oversee MEC operations before, during, and after the election.

Fourth, they demanded the inclusive participation of political parties, civil society, faith groups, youth, women, traditional leaders, and the media throughout the electoral process.

Fifth, they urged MEC to enhance its voter education efforts in every language and across all platforms to counter disinformation and restore public confidence.

Finally, they stressed the importance of strengthening MEC’s independence while ensuring full accountability to the Malawian people and the Constitution.

Addressing the Commissioners directly, the CSOs reminded them that history had entrusted them with safeguarding Malawi’s democratic future.

They warned that MEC’s role was far greater than administrative—it was a sacred duty to defend the people’s voice and uphold justice.

The CSOs emphasized that they are seeking cooperation, not confrontation.

They pledged their full support if MEC adheres to constitutional and democratic principles but vowed to resist any deviation from these values.

To underline the urgency of their demands, the CSOs gave MEC a seven-day ultimatum to address the issues raised.

Failure to respond, they warned, would prompt them to consult Malawians on the next steps.

They expressed hope that the 2025 elections would be remembered as a moment of unity, renewal, and democratic pride—not marred by irregularities or distrust.

The letter was signed by key figures, including Cde. Edwards Kambanje (Concerned Citizens of Malawi), Evangelist Steve Chimwaza (Umodzi for Peace and Justice), and Joseph Peshi (Economic Freedom Movement).

Other signatories included Prof. Kinka Makoloni, Jonathan Phiri, Kingsley Mpaso of the Malawi Freedom Fighters, and organizations like Human Right Ambassadors and Center for Democracy Watch.

The letter was widely distributed to stakeholders, including the Malawi Human Rights Commission, political parties, diplomatic missions, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Homeland Security, the UN Resident Coordinator, the SADC Electoral Advisory Council, and the African Union.

It was also sent to the Judiciary, the Speaker of the National Assembly, the Public Affairs Committee, and various media houses.

With their demands laid bare, the CSOs made one thing clear: safeguarding democracy is non-negotiable.

The road to 2025 will determine whether Malawi moves forward with confidence—or falls into disillusionment.

Malawi’s CSOs pen Mutharika on 10-point ultimatum; still insist on Gondwe and Nankhumwa firing

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-The country’s Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) on Monday disclosed that they have formally written President Peter Mutharika to swiftly work on their demands.

This comes after the deadline for the MK4 billion payout demos’ petition elapsed.

Some of key issues including the reversal of Rodney Jose’s appointment as acting Inspector General of Police and fire Finance Minister Goodall Gondwe and Local government minister Kondwani Nankhumwa.

The CSOs want Jose fired alleging he is connected to the death of Polytechnic student Robert Chasowa whilst the two ministers are accused of illegally splashing over K4bn to Members of Parliament (MPs).

Gift Trapence, one of the demos’ leaders told Zodiak that the letter follows the successful April 27 protests and the subsequent petition to the Head of State.

Trapence therefore accused President Mutharika of non-committal in addressing the issues.

“The deadline for the firing of Jose, Goodall and Nankhumwa has way passed. Therefore, we have decided to write him. We will deliver the letter next week,” he said.

But Presidential Spokesman Mgeme Kalilani said the President will only act on the issues a report from a committee he appointed on the matter a few weeks ago.

According to Kalilani, the special committee is being headed by Chief Secretary in the Office of the President and Cabinet Lloyd Muhara.

In their 10-point petition, the CSOs had given Mutharika up to 90 days to deal with the issues raised or leave his office.

The petition also calls end of electricity outages within 85 days; and completion of investigations into the killings of former Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) administrator Issa Njauju and Polytechnic student Robert Chasowa.

The CSOs are concerned with alleged Executive abuse and manipulation; high level corruption manifested in the MK236 billion Cashgate, the MK4 billion issue, the rejected Electoral Reforms Bills, worsening water problems, high cost of living, abuse of State media and chiefs; among others.

Pres. Mutharika’s govt adamant and undemocratic—Public Affairs Committee (PAC)

Malawi’s democracy-minded religious grouping–the Public Affairs Committee (PAC) has described President Peter Mutharika’s government as the most difficult to deal with in the history of the country.

Pres. Peter Mutharika: PAC says his govt is adamant and undemocratic

Through its publicity secretary Father Peter Mlomole said on Saturday that Muthariks administration has the the problem of pontification.

This comes against a background of Mutharika government’s unwillingness to settle issues raised by PAC in February last year bordering on good governance.

According to Father Mlomole, the religious leaders have observed that Mutharika’s administration is adamant and undemocratic clarifying that it does not listen to productive advice coming from people outside the government.

“We’ve been knocking at the government doors to settle the issues at hand but to avail. This is because government plays delay tactics on the matter,” said Mlomole.

He said the big problem with the current government is that its leadership believes that they are above everyone else and that they know everything inside out.

However, when asked to comment on the matter government spokesperson Nicholas Dausi wondered if such words are from the men of God.

“I don’t think the real men of God can say that, they are mandated to say words that can bring unity and peace but PAC should know that we are ready for the discussion and settle down the said issues,” argued Dausi.

It appears that it is not only PAC having such concerns about undemocratic tendencies in the Peter Mutharika’s administration. Just recently, several Malawians as well as Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) have also shared PAC’s concerns.

Pres. Mutharika refuses to take action against maize-gate suspects without concrete evidence

President Peter Mutharika has on Saturday vowed to deal with any person involved in the Zambia maize scandal without looking at status or name of the individuals the moment he has concrete evidence.

Malawi Pres. Peter Mutharika: needs concrete evidence to take action against maize-gate suspects.

According to Mutharika Malawians should not expect him firing any maize-gate suspect from his or her position without concrete evidence.

He said that is why he established the commission of inquiry to investigate what really transpired on the ground before taking an action.

“I will not and I cannot take any action against maize-gate suspects out of suspicion. I will need concrete evidence before taking action,” said Mutharika.

While acknowledging the importance of maize to the country, Mutharika asked Malawians to wait for the evidence from the commission of inquiry and stop pressurizing him.

“I know that lives of Malawians depend on maize and that everyone is eager to know what really happened on the maize deal but I urge you to be calm,” he said.

In her remarks, chairperson for the commission retired chief justice Anastasia Msosa asked Malawians to have trust in them.

However, some Malawians including the political pundits and some Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) have demanded an inclusive commission of inquiry in a letter they recently wrote President Peter Mutharika.

In the letter, the CSOs also asked President Mutharika to fire Agriculture Minister Dr George Chaponda and ADMARC boss Foster Mulumbe to pave way for the investigation.

However, Chaponda rubbished the call saying he is innocent.