Tag Archives: Jones Gadama

Opinion

Maravipost UK reader responds to Jones Gadama in his column on secondments of five military officers

MaraviPost

By Finley Mbella

Dear Sir,(Jones Gadama)

Hoping my WhatsApp message finds you in good spirits and health. I am a very good follower of your articles, and indeed I’ve learnt a lot from them.

My name is Finley Mbella. I live here in the UK. I came here in 2002 after retiring from the army, having worked for 25 years.

I thought I should comment about this issue concerning the secondments of those 5 military officers. It is really a shame that the ‘judiciary’ has turned itself into a bullying institution in Malawi. Actually, their responsibilities requires them to work hand in hand with the other 2 arms of government and possibly provide an advisory role to both the Executive and the Legislature. Being antagonistic, and know-it-all merely defeats the purposes of having those 3 institutions in a government.

Those who crafted the ‘Law’ knew what they were doing. In any democratic country there are demarcations when it comes to the application of both the ‘Civil Law’ on one hand, and the ‘Military Law’ on the other. Military law has to be applied within the context and atmosphere of the military (barracks).

High court dismisses chief secretary’s application to overturn MDF officers’ stay order

A serving military personnel is answerable to both civil and military law. It depends on the circumstances under which a crime is committed. Minor civil infringements can summarily be dealt with within the barracks’ setup but if the charge is severe and involves issues outside of the barracks, the culprit, though a military person, has to answer charges in a civilian court. In the military they have ‘Court Martials’. An officer/soldier has to abide to both civil/military laws; while as a civilian is covered by the civil law only. It is therefore, disingenuous for Justice Kenyatta Nyirenda to bulldoze his judiciary muscle wholesale, in the process throw out the window the gravity and real essence of the ‘MILITARY LAW’. In developed countries, that practice can not be condoned. Malawi being a democracy in transition, anything goes!!

During my time in the military I saw General Matewere (late), General Namwali (late), and General Simwaka, being appointed as directors of security at ESCOM, RESERVE BANK, and MALAWI HOUSING CORPORATIONS. A few years ago we witnessed some generals seconded into various institutions, and these were Generals Msonthi, Odillo, Maulana, Supuni, Namathanga, Nundwe etc, etc and nobody ran to the judiciary to lodge a complaint. Why this time with these 5 people, how special are they?

You are right in your judgement that the militaty is an institution that is governed and upheld by military ethics and discipline. Insubordination, refusing to accept an order, mutiny or disorderly of any sort is punishable by a court martial. There is no justification for the judges to start throwing spanners in the military machinery. That on its own sets up a wrong precedence that will compromise the operations of the military, for simply to satisfy someone’s ego and misdirected ambitions.

In reality, these men should have read the writing on the wall that loudly says “their services in the military is no longer required” – period. Others have been kicked out of the system without any secondment at all. They are lucky that they have politely been asked to shift in order to create room for competent, seasoned and trustworthy mlitary personnel. Well, I thought I needed to amplify your observations concerning this and the other areas you talked about. It is hightime these corrupt judges were told the truth concerning their delivery of the expected services to the nation.

from Daniel Kennedy Nyasulu….

Jones Gadama’s opinion on Justice Kenyatta’s ruling posted on Maravi post makes no legal, moral or politocal sense. He has opined that the ruling is a hindrance to national progress!!?

On the contrary, that ruling on the redeployment of MDF Officers is not a roadblock or hindrance to progress, rather a necessary check on executive power. He has referred to what he considers similar redeployments during the Chakwera regime which went unchallenged. The fact that there was no challenge to the previous ones must not mean they were right or legitimate – that simply means moone brought up the issues to the forefront. Now that the matter has been raised and brouhht to light the Court has acted within its mandate, has done a rightful duty in upholding the law and ensuring the Malawi Defence Forces (MDF) focuses on its core mandate.

Critics might argue, like Jones Gadama has done, that the Court is overstepping, but really it is about ensuring accountability and preventing abuse of power. The MDF’s role is crucial and diverting them to non-core tasks risks compromising national security. We must focus on supporting our forces in doing their job effectively.

Human Rights, Law and order

Maravi Post contributor Jones Gadama in court over MBC employee Mwandira’s “cooked cybercrime” claims

Maravi Post Reporter


By Vincent Gunde

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-One of the country’s courageous journalist who fought tirelessly through his pen for change of leadership from Malawi Congress Party (MCP) to Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Jones Gadama is reporting for his Police bail fortnightly from Blantyre to Lilongwe despite the availability of police stations in Blantyre causing unnecessary financial and psychological strain.

On 5th December, 2025 police officers travelled from Lilongwe to Blantyre where they arrested Maravi Post contributor Gadama allegedly at the instigation of an MBC employee Ms. Barbara Mwandira for two documents relating to allegations of misconduct by Barbara Mwandira including that she had victimized fellow MBC employees following a regime change from the MCP to DPP.

Upon seeing the documents posted, Barbara Mwandira bypassed all editorial engagement and rushed to the Malawi Police Service (MPS) demanding the arrest of Maravi Post administrators and editors for authorizing the document to be posted.

A police officer (Mr. Chimwemwe Magawa) summoned the Maravi Post Country Manager Mr. Lloyd M’bwana for questioning regarding the post who referred the officer to the publisher for editorial resolution but the officer refused this, he started issuing threats of arrest, this escalated into intimidations and pressure to produce staff members.

In a letter to Minister of Homeland Security Peter Mukhito signed by Elwin Mandowa (Publisher) and Lloyd M’bwana (Country Manager), the Maravi Post says the arrest of contributor Jones Gadama has raised grace concerns for freedom of expression, freedom of the press and the professional independence of journalists in Malawi.

In the letter, the Maravi Post has expressed its grave concern that Jones Gadama was transported overnight from Blantyre to Lilongwe, detained at Lingadzi Police Station, denied communication and has his mobile phone confiscated (which remains in police custody).

The Maravi Post has described the arrest of Jones Gadama as occurred without prior summons and without editorial engagement expressing fears that if journalists can be arrested, transported at night, and silenced on the instruction of a junior public employee, then no journalist in Malawi is safe.

“We are deeply troubled by reports that Ms. Barbara Mwandira is said to be a former police officer, this is raising serious questions about undue influence, conflict of interest and manipulation of law enforcement processes by a junior staff member at a public broadcaster,” reads the letter in part.

The Maravi Post has finally appealed for independent review of police conduct, immediate intervention to halt police harassment, and a clear guidance to police on constitutional media freedoms- journalists across the country should enjoy in the course of their everyday work.

In 2024 under the Malawi Congress Party (MCP) administration, the Maravi Post faced similar police intimidation following a report posted on alleged Fraud at the National Intelligence Bureau (NIB), arrests were made.

Opinion

Hard Truth: The unseen struggles of Malawi’s democratic progress in 2025

Jones Gadama

As 2025 draws to a close, it is fitting to reflect candidly on the political landscape that has shaped Malawi this year.

The democratic spirit was vividly on display on September 16, 2025, when Malawians exercised their right to vote, reaffirming their commitment to participatory governance.

The hard truth is that despite significant challenges, the electorate’s engagement was commendable and a testament to Malawi’s resilient democracy. Yet, beneath this celebratory surface lies a complex interplay of political dynamics and judicial interventions that warrant sober examination.

The 2025 election campaign period was far from a level playing field.

The main opposition, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), faced notable obstacles, particularly concerning access to the Malawi Broadcasting Corporation (MBC), the public broadcaster. The hard truth is that the DPP’s restricted access to MBC underscored persistent imbalances in media freedom and political pluralism.

Public broadcasters, ideally neutral, often become arenas of contestation, and in this instance, the DPP had to navigate significant hurdles to communicate its manifestos to the populace effectively.

This unevenness in campaign conditions poses broader questions about the fairness of electoral processes, which remain critical to democratic consolidation.

Despite these constraints, all political contenders presented their manifestos to the electorate, offering visions for Malawi’s future.

The hard truth is that the manifesto of the DPP, under the leadership of Professor Arthur Peter Mutharika, resonated deeply with many Malawians, capturing their hopes and aspirations. The DPP’s message, promising robust service delivery and nationwide development, evidently struck a chord, propelling the party to the forefront of governance.

This outcome reflects the electorate’s trust in the party’s capacity to translate promises into tangible improvements in their daily lives.

With the DPP now in the driver’s seat, laying the foundations for service delivery as outlined in its manifesto, the stakes are high.

The hard truth is that political promises must be matched by effective governance, which requires internal cohesion and a commitment to meritocracy within the party and government structures.

For the DPP to succeed, it is imperative to prune “bad apples” and ensure that those in strategic positions share the party’s vision and dedication to fulfilling the manifesto’s objectives. Without such alignment, the risk of inefficiency and corruption could undermine progress and erode public trust.

However, as the year closes, a significant impediment to the DPP’s governance efforts has emerged from an unexpected quarter: the judiciary.

The hard truth is that unnecessary injunctions and stay orders granted by courts have increasingly hampered the party’s ability to implement its strategies.

Since assuming power, the DPP has not engaged in wholesale firings within statutory corporations but has instead opted for transfers and redeployments, a common administrative practice across Malawi’s political administrations.

These personnel changes span critical institutions such as the military, police, Electricity Supply Corporation of Malawi (ESCOM), and water boards.

It is important to recognize that such administrative redeployments are not novel or unique to the current government.

The hard truth is that successive Malawian governments—from the Malawi Congress Party (MCP) under the late Hastings Kamuzu Banda, to the United Democratic Front (UDF) under Bakili Muluzi, the DPP under the late Professor Bingu wa Mutharika, the People’s Party (PP) under Dr. Joyce Banda, the MCP under Dr. Lazarus Chakwera, and now the DPP once again—have all engaged in similar practices. These redeployments serve as tools for aligning key positions with the government’s strategic priorities and ensuring efficient service delivery.

Yet, the judicial system’s intervention has complicated this administrative prerogative.

The hard truth is that individuals affected by these transfers are increasingly seeking refuge in the courts, obtaining injunctions that stall the implementation of the government’s redeployment plans. Consequently, many entrusted with vital roles remain unable to assume their responsibilities, leaving critical institutions in a state of limbo.

This judicial obstruction places the DPP in an awkward position, caught between honoring its manifesto commitments and respecting court orders that delay progress.

This situation presents a paradox between the branches of government.

The hard truth is that while the judiciary operates within the framework of the law and upholds the rights of individuals, its decisions in these cases inadvertently impede the executive’s ability to govern effectively.

The courts’ role in delivering justice is indispensable; however, prolonged injunctions and the slow pace of judicial reviews, often dragging on for months or even years, create bottlenecks that stall national development initiatives.

The phrase “pending judicial review” has become a recurrent refrain accompanying the granting of these injunctions, signaling lengthy legal processes ahead.

The hard truth is that such delays are detrimental not only to the government’s operational capacity but also to the broader public interest.

When strategic appointments and redeployments are frozen by protracted court cases, the delivery of essential services—from electricity and water provision to security and public administration—suffers.

As Malawi transitions into 2026, the imperative for a balanced approach between judicial independence and governance efficiency becomes ever more pressing.

The hard truth is that the judiciary, staffed by individuals endowed with intellect and empathy, must recognize the broader implications of its rulings on national progress.

This column calls upon the judiciary to exercise prudence in granting injunctions, reserving them for cases where genuine legal grievances exist and avoiding those that serve to obstruct legitimate governmental functions unnecessarily.

Furthermore, the hard truth is that expediting judicial reviews is critical. Delays in concluding these reviews undermine public confidence in the justice system and stall administrative action.

Streamlining judicial processes, enhancing case management, and deploying adequate resources to handle judicial reviews promptly would go a long way in harmonizing the relationship between the judiciary and the executive.

For Malawians, it is essential to understand the complexities underlying these judicial-executive tensions.

The hard truth is that the courts are not antagonists to progress but guardians of legal rights. Yet, the judiciary’s decisions, though lawful, can sometimes inadvertently slow down the momentum of development.

Appreciating this duality allows citizens to advocate for reforms that uphold justice while fostering effective governance.

In reflecting on the year 2025, this column acknowledges the resilience of Malawi’s democratic institutions and the vibrancy of its political discourse.

The hard truth is that democracy is a continuous journey marked by challenges and opportunities.

The peaceful exercise of voting rights by Malawians in September is a milestone worth celebrating, but it must be complemented by a governance environment where political will, administrative action, and judicial oversight coalesce harmoniously.

Looking ahead, the DPP’s success in delivering on its manifesto will hinge on its ability to manage internal party cohesion, uphold meritocracy, and navigate the judicial landscape effectively.

The hard truth is that political leadership entails balancing competing interests and overcoming institutional hurdles without compromising democratic principles or the rule of law.

As Malawi steps into 2026, the nation stands at a crossroads. The hard truth is that for Malawi to realize its developmental aspirations, all arms of government—the executive, legislature, and judiciary—must engage in constructive dialogue and cooperation.

Each institution has a vital role to play, and only through mutual respect and understanding can Malawi advance towards sustainable progress and improved service delivery for its citizens.

This column remains hopeful that 2026 will witness a more synchronized approach to governance, where judicial prudence supports rather than stalls national development, political leaders deliver on their promises, and Malawians continue to exercise their democratic rights with wisdom and vigilance.

The hard truth is that democracy demands patience, resilience, and above all, a shared commitment to the nation’s welfare.

May Malawi meet these challenges head-on in the coming year.

Feedback:0992082424
jonesgadama@gmail.com

Opinion

If I were Lazarus Chakwera, President of Malawi

Maravi Post Author

By Jones Gadama

If I were Lazarus Chakwera, President of Malawi, I would strive to transform the nation into a beacon of hope and progress in Southern Africa.

I would prioritize education, healthcare, and economic development, ensuring that every Malawian has access to the resources and opportunities they need to thrive.

I would work tirelessly to combat corruption, promote transparency, and foster a culture of accountability within the government.

My vision would be to create a Malawi where every citizen feels empowered to contribute to the nation’s growth and development.

How I wish I were in a position to implement these changes! The challenges facing Malawi are immense, and the weight of leadership can be overwhelming. However, I believe that with determination and a clear vision, it is possible to overcome these obstacles.

I would focus on building a strong team of advisors and experts who share my commitment to the betterment of our nation. Together, we would develop comprehensive policies that address the root causes of poverty, unemployment, and inequality.

Indeed, if I were a Reverend of the Assemblies of God Church and then President of Malawi, my faith would guide my leadership.

I would draw upon the teachings of compassion, service, and justice that are central to my beliefs. I would seek to unite the nation, transcending political and tribal divisions, and fostering a spirit of collaboration and mutual respect.

My administration would prioritize social justice, ensuring that marginalized communities have a voice in the decision-making process. I would advocate for policies that uplift the most vulnerable members of society, including women, children, and the elderly.

My burning desire, if I were the “Sin’dziwa zonsee,” would be to create a Malawi where every citizen feels valued and heard. I would invest in education, recognizing that it is the foundation for a prosperous future. I would work to improve the quality of our schools, ensuring that every child has access to a quality education, regardless of their background. I would also prioritize vocational training and skills development, equipping our youth with the tools they need to succeed in a rapidly changing job market.

I am saying only if I were the outgoing President Lazarus Chakwera, I would reflect on the lessons learned during my tenure and use them to inform my future actions. I would acknowledge the challenges that have arisen during my time in office, including the ongoing struggles with corruption, economic instability, and public discontent. I would take responsibility for the shortcomings of my administration and work to address them head-on. I would engage with the public, listening to their concerns and incorporating their feedback into my policies.

If I were in his position, I would make the ACB independent with the power to investigate and prosecute corrupt officials without fear of political interference. I would also work to strengthen the legal framework surrounding corruption, ensuring that those who engage in corrupt practices are held accountable.

What I am saying is that ,if only I were Lazarus Chakwera, I would approach the presidency with a sense of purpose and a commitment to serving the people of Malawi. I would strive to create a nation where every citizen has the opportunity to thrive, and where the values of compassion, justice, and integrity guide our actions.

Unfortunately, I am not Lazarus Chakwera. I am only Jones Gadama alias Twinkspurge with a pen as my armour, who dreams of a better Malawi. While I may not have the power to enact these changes myself, I rely on my pen which is a great weapon

Lifestyle

Student leader’s plea: Jones Gadama embarks on Big Walk to raise school fees

Jones Gadama

By Staff Reporter

Jones Gadama, a fourth-year student at University of Blantyre Synod pursuing a Bachelor of Arts in Education, is on the verge of being withdrawn from the university due to outstanding school fees.

Jones has been barred from attending lessons and writing examinations due to his inability to settle his school fees.

Jones, who is also a class representative and a writer, has been contributing to various publications, including the Sunday Times Oped Column and online platforms like Maravi Post as well as 247Malawi.

The university has rejected Jones’s application for a payment plan, insisting that he settle the entire amount at once.

With a total of MK1.5 million needed to clear his outstanding fees, Jones has organized a big walk on April 25 from Zalewa to Lunzu, aiming to raise K2.5Million.

In an interview with our reporter, Jones said, “I have tried all other means to raise funds, but I have failed. This big walk is my last hope.

I am appealing to all well-wishers to support me in my effort to raise MK2.5 million for my school fees.”

The big walk, scheduled for April 25, is expected to bring together supporters and well-wishers who can contribute to Jones’s cause.

Those willing to support Jones can reach him on 0992082424 (calls only) or 0985209615 (WhatsApp). Alternatively, they can contact the university’s Registrar, Mrs. Longwe, at 0995250986.

Donations can also be made through the University of Blantyre Synod’s FDH Bank Current account (Umoyo branch, account number 1850004272606) or Jones Gadama’s National Bank of Malawi account (Chichiri Branch, account number 2302853).

Jones has been unable to pay his school fees, and the university is requiring full payment at once.

The outcome of Jones’s big walk will determine his academic future. Jones said, “I am not giving up on my dreams, and I need your support to make them a reality.”

Politics

Jones Gadama Criticizes Government’s Extravagance in the Purchase of 4 Toyota Prados

Burnett Munthali

By Burnett Munthali

Malawi’s economic struggles have once again taken center stage, as the government’s controversial purchase of four Toyota First Edition Prado luxury vehicles for K333,450,000 each has sparked outrage. Popular journalist and political analyst Jones Gadama voiced his strong disapproval in a candid interview, criticizing the government for prioritizing opulence over the pressing needs of its citizens.

When asked about his immediate thoughts on the luxury vehicle purchase, Gadama expressed both shock and disappointment. He pointed out the stark contrast between the government’s lavish spending and the dire circumstances of everyday Malawians. “It’s astonishing to see such extravagance at a time when many Malawians are struggling to put food on the table,” Gadama stated, highlighting the famine affecting regions like Machinga and Balaka, where some citizens are surviving on wild buffalo beans.

According to Gadama, this decision shows a severe disconnect between the government and the people it serves. “This is not just a poor choice; it’s a lack of empathy,” he added.

Gadama noted that the public’s reaction has been overwhelmingly negative, with many Malawians feeling betrayed by their leaders. The frustration, he said, is understandable. “People are angry, and rightfully so,” Gadama emphasized. “When citizens are starving and living in poverty, this purchase feels like a slap in the face, especially when basic needs are not being met.”

The outcry has highlighted a broader concern about the government’s inability to manage public funds effectively, raising serious questions about whether the administration truly has the nation’s best interests at heart.

Gadama did not mince words when discussing the government’s spending priorities. He argued that the purchase of luxury vehicles at such a critical time reflects deeper issues with the administration’s fiscal management. “This is irresponsible,” Gadama stated bluntly. “Funds should be directed toward essential sectors like healthcare, education, and providing food for the starving.”

He pointed out that hospitals are lacking basic supplies, schools are in disrepair, and many citizens are struggling to survive, yet the government has chosen to allocate resources for luxury cars instead. “This kind of decision-making is unforgivable,” Gadama concluded.

Gadama also discussed the political ramifications of this purchase for President Lazarus Chakwera, whose administration is already facing declining public support. “Chakwera’s reputation is on shaky ground, and this decision could cost him dearly in next year’s election,” Gadama warned.

With a promise to prioritize economic growth and accountability, the president’s indulgence in such extravagance appears contradictory. Gadama believes that the timing of this purchase, so close to the elections, could further alienate the electorate. “It paints him and his administration as out-of-touch, which is dangerous politically,” Gadama observed.

Beyond the immediate political fallout, Gadama pointed to the troubling symbolism of the luxury vehicle purchase. “To the public, it says, ‘We are above you, and your struggles don’t matter as much as our comfort,’” Gadama explained.

He also expressed concern over the broader economic impact, suggesting that such profligate spending could discourage investor confidence. “No one wants to invest in a country where the government is more focused on personal luxury than improving the economy and supporting its citizens,” Gadama remarked. He warned that Malawi cannot afford to alienate investors, especially given the fragile state of its economy.

In his concluding remarks, Gadama offered a path forward, urging the government to make an immediate public apology and redirect funds to critical sectors. He stressed that future decisions on luxury purchases must be transparent and involve public oversight to avoid similar controversies.

“Malawians are demanding accountability,” Gadama said. “If the government ignores this, the consequences could be politically and economically catastrophic.”

Finally, when asked about the possibility of Chakwera losing next year’s election, Gadama called for thorough investigations into the misuse of public funds. “If Chakwera and his administration are found guilty of looting taxpayers’ money, there should be no hesitation in holding them legally accountable,” he stated firmly. Gadama believes that ensuring accountability would mark the beginning of a new era of transparency in Malawi’s politics.

Jones Gadama’s analysis offers a sobering reminder of the importance of responsible governance. His critique of the luxury vehicle purchase underlines the need for Malawian leaders to refocus their priorities on the urgent needs of the people. As the nation approaches the 2025 elections, this issue could play a pivotal role in shaping the future of Malawi’s political and economic landscape.