Tag Archives: Judge Kenan Manda

Gabriel Chembezi report expose more rot at High Court Commerce division

..….LAW SOCIETY REPORT ALLEGES SYSTEMIC IRREGULARITIES IN HIGH COURT COMMERCIAL DIVISION

LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-The Malawi Law Society (MLS) has released findings of a Special Inquiry into the conduct of court business at the High Court Commercial Division in Lilongwe, raising serious concerns about alleged procedural irregularities and possible bias in several commercial cases.

The report, presented by Gabriel Chembezi to the MLS Executive Committee and the Annual General Meeting in 2023, examined complaints relating to multiple commercial cases handled within the division.

According to the findings, there is evidence suggesting a pattern in which certain litigants and legal practitioners allegedly received preferential treatment in the allocation and handling of cases.

The Committee found what it described as “blatant violations of Rules of Procedure,” including the issuance of enforcement orders such as Seizure and Sale Orders before the expiry of mandatory 14-day compliance periods under the Civil Procedure Rules.

In several cases reviewed, judgments were entered without proper assessment of damages or without full trial processes where factual disputes existed.

The inquiry identified two judicial officers – Justice Kenan Manda and Assistant Registrar Anthony Kapaswiche – as central figures in the handling of the questioned matters.

The Committee further observed that certain enforcement actions were executed with unusual speed, raising suspicion about coordinated conduct involving registry processes and the Sheriff’s office.

Among the cases highlighted were:

  1. FISD Company Ltd v China State Construction Engineering Corporation
  2. Standard Bank plc v Mike Msungama Trading (Asaba Car Rentals)
  3. Blue Deebaj FZCO v Smallholder Farmers Fertilizer Revolving Fund of Malawi (SFFRFM)
  4. Simama General Dealers Ltd v SFFRFM

The report also referenced the involvement of several senior legal practitioners whose cases allegedly benefited from expedited processing or favourable procedural handling.

In its recommendations, the Committee called for:

  • Reporting Justice Manda and Assistant Registrar Kapaswiche to the Judicial Service Commission;
  • Reporting implicated sheriff officers;
  • Referring certain legal practitioners to the Disciplinary Committee;
  • Immediate withdrawal of the named judicial officers from the Commercial Division pending investigations;
  • Reopening and reviewing affected cases before impartial judges;
  • Development of clearer guidelines on case allocation and issuance of enforcement processes.

However, the Committee clarified that its findings were largely based on complaints submitted and that full access to court files and registry records was not available during the inquiry.

It also noted that there was insufficient material to conclude that Justices of Appeal in the Supreme Court had provided tacit support for the alleged conduct.

The report concludes that further investigations are necessary to establish the full extent of the alleged impropriety and to safeguard the integrity of Malawi’s Commercial Court system.

Judge Kenan Manda takes extended leave amid misconduct investigations

By Jones Gadama

High Court of Malawi Commercial Division Judge Kenan Manda has been granted an extended leave by the Judiciary, effective immediately, pending the conclusion of investigations into allegations of professional misconduct.

The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) and the High Court of Malawi and Supreme Court of Appeal confirmed the development in separate interviews.

According to JSC Secretary Ireen Chikapa, Judge Manda requested the leave to pave the way for investigations after concerns about his conduct built up.

The JSC commenced investigations into Manda’s alleged misconduct in February, reviewing 26 complaints and selecting four for further probe.

Chikapa emphasized that the commission would meet for a comprehensive review to determine the next steps in addressing the complaints.

High Court of Malawi and Supreme Court of Appeal Chief Registrar Innocent Nebi corroborated Chikapa’s statement, explaining that Judge Manda had asked the Judiciary to stop assigning him duties due to integrity concerns.

Nebi stated that the application was approved, and the judge was placed on extended leave.

Background of the Investigations

The investigations into Judge Manda’s conduct follow allegations of corruption and other malpractices.

The Malawi Law Society (MLS) has urged the JSC to expedite the investigations, particularly in light of a defamation case where Judge Manda is demanding K250 million in damages from lawyer Alexious Kamangila. Kamangila, a corruption whistleblower, had requested MLS’s assistance in the case, citing concerns for his safety and that of his family.

Reactions from Stakeholders

Kamangila described Judge Manda’s extended leave as a positive development, emphasizing the importance of impartial investigations.

However, he expressed disappointment that the Judiciary and JSC did not publicly disclose the reasons behind the judge’s leave. Kamangila stressed the need for transparency and accountability within the Judiciary.

Michael Kaiyatsa, Executive Director of the Centre for Human Rights and Rehabilitation (CHRR), echoed Kamangila’s sentiments, highlighting concerns about transparency and due process within the Judiciary. Kaiyatsa emphasized the need for swift, transparent, and fair investigations to restore public trust in the justice system.

Parliamentary Inquiry

The Legal Affairs Committee of Parliament has also launched an inquiry into the allegations against Judge Manda.

Committee Chairperson Peter Dimba stated that the inquiry aims to examine the allegations and determine the next steps, including potential impeachment proceedings.

As the investigations unfold, stakeholders are closely watching the developments, emphasizing the importance of accountability and transparency within the Judiciary.

The outcome of the investigations will likely have significant implications for the Malawian justice system and the public’s trust in its institutions.