LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-Government lawmakers in the ongoing Parliamentary 2016 budget review meeting under way in the capital Lilongwe on Thursday vehemently opposed amendments to the Presidential and Parliamentary Elections Act (PPEA) arguing that thorough consultations have not been conducted on the bill.
The government legislators went further advising opposition Member of Parliament (MPs) to leave the whole process of reviewing the law to the Malawi Law Commission (MLC) in consultation with Malawi Electoral Commission (MEC) alongside its stakeholders.
The main opposition Malawi Congress Party (MCP) MP for Lilongwe South constituency, Peter Dimba moved the motion as a private member bill which seeks to change counting and management of elections results.
Richard Msowoya: Malawi speaker
After the bill was introduced in the house, on several attempts, government MPs called for a roll call vote (division) to stop the mover of the bill (Lawmaker Dimba) for making a second reading which summaries the contents of the bill prior for debate.
Eventually, a motion to extend time beyond 17:00 hours to allow continuation of the debate thwarted government attempts to have the bill dismissed at second reading before it could possibly referred to a legal committee with expectation to bring the bill next week Thursday.
Government Chief Whip Henry Mussa observed that electoral reforms were an issue of national importance and could not be passed without consulting a large number of Malawians.
Justice and Constitution Affairs Minister Samuel Tembenu therefore asked for patience on the electoral reforms process which he said would be completed on March 31, 2017.
But Peoples Party (PP)’s Nkhata Bay Central MP Ralph Mhone expressed worrisome over some members that do not believe the house has powers to introduce and amend laws when Section 8 of the constitution mandates Parliament with the duty of enacting laws.
Mhone reminded those against the bill of what transpired during the 2014 tripartite elections which were marred with irregularities arguing that the current bill amendments are simply aimed at addressing such challenges.
The bill introduces a new section, Section 93 (2) that stipulates that “all recordings in relation to the number of votes, just voters and ballot papers shall be recorded in both Arabic numerals and words” to deter alterations of results at the district tally centre where results from constituencies are tallied.
The bill seeks also to establish constituency tally centres by deleting the word “polling station” from Section 94 and 95 of PPEA and substituting them with “constituency tally centres”.
The law proposes provision for smooth transition after elections that swearing in of the winning President should be done after 21 days of announcing results.
Verbal war erupted between the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Malawi Congress Party (MCP) officials on Thursday in Karonga during the elevation of Traditional Authority Mwilang’ombe to the Senior Chief.
Minister of Local Government and Rural Development Kondwani Nankhumwa
The event was graced by the Minister of Local Government and Rural Development Kondwani Nankhumwa, DPP region governor for the north Kenneth Sanga, DPP Karonga north west law maker John Bond Kamwambi and Speaker of Parliament who was also the MP for the area Richard Msowoya as well as Paramount Chief Kyungu and Chikulamayembe among others. Continue reading DPP and MCP leaders hurl insults at each other at the elevation of chief Mwilang’ombe in Karonga→
Chakwera; told to tread carefully else he may be heading for disaster
Since the multiparty referendum of 1992, Malawi Congress Party (MCP) has struggled to garner meaningful support in the Southern and Northern regions of Malawi.
With time, its stronghold, the Centre, has become increasingly accommodating to other parties and independents.
On the other hand, the 2005-born Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) – MCP’s current nemesis, has up to now managed its stronghold very well. Save for a few independents, no other party wins seats in the Lhomwe belt but DPP secures seats in the Centre and North.
Get me right Blue Orators, I am not implying that MCP cannot break the jinx. Holding all things constant, MCP can even win the presidential election.
To lend weight to this, the legendary Raphael Tenthani (MHSCRIP), in the run-up to May 20, consistently argued in his Sunday Muckraking column that the 2014 elections were for Chakwera to lose.
In theory, MCP just needed to marshall all eligible voters in the Centre to turn out on polling day and secure over 90 percent of their votes.
What happened, however, is that protecting its stronghold, let alone persuading people to turn out in the numbers necessary to attain the critical mass needed to tip the scale in its favour, proved difficult.
And Tenthani’s forecast notwithstanding, whether it was the fact that MCP had no parliamentary candidates in 39 constituencies to serve as the party’s local champions and custodians of its presidential votes or the fact that the North did not reward Chakwera for Richard Msowoya’s selection as running mate because it already had ‘Nkomwana’ in Joyce Banda or that the elections were rigged, Chakwera lost.
Once beaten twice shy, the saying goes.
As we speak, MCP is reportedly ‘rebuilding’ via a strange combination of controversial district elections, point less suspensions, problematic expulsions, and of late, courting Muhamed Siddik Mia presumably to run alongside Chakwera in 2019.
It appears that rather than work with the North – where the party faired badly in May 2014, or harness the Centre, including Chakwera’s home district, Lilongwe, where the party lost some parliamentary seats; MCP thinks romancing the Shire Valley is its best manoeuvre to counter the ruling DPP’s and United Democratic Front (UDF)’s collective supremacy in the populous South.
Blue Orators, let us weigh in and unravel the maze as best we can.
The first issue is that among the major parties, MCP, although endowed with assets like the National Headquarters and other buildings spread across the country – plus plenty of goodwill, is as cash-strapped as a church mouse.
And this, Blue Orators, is where MCP’s problems begin.
Because, whether MCP fixes whatever went wrong in 2014 and sticks to the Chakwera/ Msowoya ticket or whether it dumps Msowoya and the ‘ungrateful’ North for Mia to cash in on his reportedly massive war chest plus the Shire Valley votes that abandoned the party with the exit of ‘Mbuya’ Gwanda Chakuamba, an empty stomach is the worst adviser.
Talking of empty stomachs, Nobel prize-winning scientist Albert Einstein (1879-1955) said: “Reduced to a formula, one might say simply that an empty stomach is not a good political adviser.”
He continued: “Unfortunately, the corollary also is true – namely, that better political insight has a hard time winning its way as long as there is little prospect of filling the stomach.”
Although Einstein was speaking about a specific political situation when implying that desperation does not make good politics, this theorem – like his many others – has since gained traction and proved its worth, over and over again.
My advice to MCP strategists – assuming there are any – is: before endorsing Mia as running mate because of his money and supposed Shire Valley following, they should soberly look at the numbers, which, when the votes have been cast, are all what matters.
For a start, having not being picked by Joyce Banda as a running mate, Mia, in a ‘chikuwawe’, endorsed Atupele Muluzi.
The questions they should ask are: “How many Shire Valley votes did Mia’s endorsement of Atupele translate into? Didn’t Atupele, with the money, name and the supposed Eastern Region popularity come a distant 4th in the presidential ballot?”
Secondly, with regard to Mia’s fortune, which could potentially bankroll the MCP’s 2019 campaign, the question they should seek honest answers to is: “Assuming that Mia’s bottomless wealth were available in 2014, would it have made a difference? How?”
Plus: “If Mia joins the MCP but is not given the running mate position he is after, will MCP manage the ensuing confusion?” Can it afford yet another crisis?”
They should, finally, consider whether: MCP lost the 2014 election due to lack of funds; or the failure to feature candidates at all levels in all the constituencies and wards; or hiring incompetents as election directors and monitors which aided the alleged rigging; or a combination of all these factors and address the causes, rather than seek the very same ‘quick-fixes’ which Chakwera is on record bantering the DPP government about.
And by embracing Mia, who has openly declared he is returning to politics for something ‘big’, MCP strategists should consider the consequential backlash, at the 2019 polls, from the Northern Region that will feel cheated for dropping thei r son, Msowoya, especially after the dismissal of a convention-elected Deputy Secretary General, Jimmy Chatonda Kaunda.
Whatever the mathematics the MCP gurus are doing, the numbers of voters in the Shire Valley, plus the porous Central Region cannot dent DPP’s and UDF’s superior numbers from the Lhomwe and Yao belts.
The Northern vote could, in fact, be the decider in 2019.
The stone that the builder rejected, all the above notwithstanding, is the ‘prophetic’ letter by the beleaguered Secretary General – Gustave Kaliwo, whose contents are now turning out to be true.
You may recall, Blue Orators, that it was Kaliwo’s letter that first announced the Mia Factor, and raised other pertinent issues that should not have been quickly written off as ‘childish’ by Msowoya or any sober party member.
The issues raised, if immediately addressed, remove the need to recycle the Mias of this world when there are a lot of capable Malawians who – if given space and not quickly branded ‘nkholokolo’ – could elevate Chakwera to the State House.
Unfortunately for Kaliwo and his counsel, Einstein’s corol lary that : bet ter political insight has a hard time winning its way as long as there is little prospect of filling the stomach, applies.
Kaliwo was, however, right.
MCP needs to move fast on Mia so that it has enough time to manage the inevitable fallout which will come after his inclusion or exclusion in the party as running mate.
To close this discourse, going against Einstein’s advice is an option for Chakwera. The only problem, going by MCP’s constitution, is that 2019 will be Chakwera’s last and final shot at the Malawi presidency.
On your behalf, Blue Orators, I wish Chakwera the best of luck as he prays on how to circumvent the conundrum posed with Mia’s ambitions and interest in MCP.
Strategists or no strategists, advisers or no advisers, nkholokolo or no nkholokolo, this is Chakwera’s ultimate litmus test in his sojourn towards the 2019 elections, which will determine if he will ever be the state president failing which, he will have to step down so that the MCP, a party never short of presidential aspirants, can move on under new leadership.
Is it too early for MCP members to start scouting? This is none of my business but they too should know that an empty stomach is not a good political adviser!
Government has furiously reacted with disdain to Malawians who are calling for the state President Peter Mutharika to start singling out and saluting opposition Malawi Congress Party (MCP) President Lazarus Chakwera when addressing public rallies.
LILONGWE, June 25, 2016, (MaraviPost): Perpetual Members of Parliament (MPs) who have been absconding the current budget sitting while collecting thousands of kwachas in allowances, are finally exposed.
This follows Speaker of the Nation Assembly, Richard Msowoya warning message to the lawmakers who habitually absent house deliberations willy-nilly that they risk having their allowances withdrawn.
BLANTYRE-(MaraviPost)—Speaker of the Nation Assembly, Richard Msowoya, has warned Members of parliament who abscond deliberations willy-nilly that they risk having their allowances withdrawn.
Msowoya sent the strong message at the beginning of the parliament sitting on Monday after observing that cases of absenteeism are on the increase.
“In view of this observation, the committee of chairs and supported by the leaders of political parties represented in the business committee resolved that, with immediate effect, the office should recover allowances from members who do not attend the plenary and committee meetings without leave of absence or without valid reasons as required by the Standing Order 41,” communicated Msowoya.
The MPs receive their allowances through their bank accounts transferred to their accounts before, during or after the meetings.
Leader of the House Francis Kasaila welcomed the development, saying it would help change the behaviour of some Members of Parliament who may have been absent in the committees and in the Chamber.
Kasaila said it was Government’s expectation that MPs would be attending Parliament sittings.
Standing Order 41 (2) says “a Member of Parliament who is granted leave of absence is excused from the service of the Assembly or any committee. The leave is forfeited if the member attends in the Chamber of the Assembly or attends a committee before the end of the period of leave.
While 41(3) stipulate that “a Member who is absent without seeking leave of absence shall forfeit all allowances during the period of absence.”
“Those MPs were elected by their constituents. I believe the constituents are able to follow what the MPs are doing,” said Kasaila.
Malawi breaking news and World News. News about Malawi, Malawi Business, Malawi Tourism, Malawi Politics, Malawi News, World and Africa Top News.