Tag Archives: Zanu-PF

Zimbabwe’s constitutional crisis: ZANU-PF’s power grab threatens democracy

HARARE-(MaraviPost)-Zimbabwe stands at a perilous crossroads as the ruling party, ZANU-PF, seeks to enact the Constitution Amendment Bill No. 3 (2026), which aims to strip citizens of their fundamental right to directly elect their president.

This proposed bill would hand over the power of choosing the head of state to a joint sitting of Parliament, effectively removing the voice of the people from the highest political decision in the nation.

This move is not just a legislative adjustment; it is a dangerous step toward entrenched dictatorship, undermining the very core of democratic governance and threatening to plunge Zimbabwe into political darkness.

At the heart of this constitutional upheaval lies a blatant attempt by ZANU-PF to cling to power through undemocratic means.

By shifting the presidential election process from a direct public vote to a parliamentary selection, the ruling party is attempting to create a system where the leader is chosen by a small, controlled political elite rather than by the citizens.

This is an affront to the principle of popular sovereignty, which holds that the people are the ultimate source of political authority.

The proposed amendment is a calculated effort to consolidate power within ZANU-PF’s parliamentary majority, leaving opposition voices marginalized and democracy hollowed out.

President Emmerson Mnangagwa, who stands to benefit from this amendment with a potential extension of his term until 2030, should be reminded of the history he is now attempting to rewrite.

During Robert Mugabe’s era, Mnangagwa was not the beneficiary of direct, popular support in his ascent to the presidency.

Instead, he came into power through a soft military coup following Mugabe’s forced resignation in 2017.

The idea that Mnangagwa should now entrench a system that removes direct elections, thereby diminishing the people’s role in choosing their leader, is deeply ironic and hypocritical.

It is a stark warning against the dangers of unchecked ambition and the perils of political arrogance that often lead to authoritarianism.

The term “imperial presidency” is frequently used to describe a system where the president holds excessive powers that overshadow other branches of government, reducing checks and balances and centralizing authority in the executive.

This bill is a clear step towards creating such an imperial presidency in Zimbabwe.

By removing direct elections and extending presidential terms, the amendment paves the way for an office that is less accountable to the people and more reliant on political machinations within Parliament.

This system risks undermining democratic institutions and eroding the rule of law, as the president’s power becomes increasingly unchecked.

Supporters of the bill argue that it will bring stability and reduce election-related violence or toxicity. However, this argument is a thin veil for what is essentially a power grab.

Stability that comes at the cost of democratic freedoms is no true stability at all; it is the stability of oppression.

Zimbabweans deserve a political system that respects their voice, their choices, and their rights—not one that silences them under the guise of order.

Democracy is not chaos; it is the orderly expression of the people’s will through free and fair elections. To remove this right is to kill democracy outright.

The chaos and intimidation reported during public hearings on the bill only reinforce suspicions that ZANU-PF is not interested in genuine dialogue or democratic process.

Instead, it appears intent on bulldozing through a constitutional change that serves its own interests.

Opposition parties and civil society groups have rightly called for a referendum, arguing that any changes of this magnitude require the explicit consent of the people.

The ruling party’s refusal to hold such a referendum speaks volumes about its disregard for popular consent and democratic principles.

The international community has taken notice, expressing concerns about the potential consequences for Zimbabwe’s democracy and stability.

Yet, Zimbabweans must not rely solely on external pressure; the fight for democratic rights must be led from within by a vigilant and courageous citizenry.

The passage of this bill would send a chilling message to all who believe in democracy: that their votes no longer matter, that their voices can be silenced by parliamentary decree, and that the country is sliding toward autocratic rule.

This constitutional amendment is more than a legislative proposal—it is a declaration of intent by ZANU-PF to entrench a system where power is concentrated in the hands of a few, where the president reigns supreme without meaningful accountability, and where the fundamental democratic right to choose one’s leader is extinguished.

Zimbabweans must resist this erosion of their democracy, remembering that the true strength of a nation lies in the will of its people, not the ambitions of its rulers.

In closing, the ruling party’s plan to abolish direct presidential elections is a betrayal of Zimbabwe’s democratic aspirations.

President Mnangagwa and ZANU-PF must be reminded that power gained without the people’s mandate is fragile and illegitimate.

Zimbabwe’s future should be built on democratic foundations, not imperial ambitions.

The proposed amendment is a recipe for dictatorship and repression, and it must be defeated to preserve the nation’s democratic soul.

Zanu-pf’s Role As Zimbabwe’s Eternal ‘Ruling Party’ Is Unlikely To Survive

By Burnett Munthali

Zimbabwe is just one of the African countries suffering from ‘ruling party syndrome’.


Zanu-PF’s role as Zimbabwe’s eternal ‘ruling party’ is unlikely to survive


“No-one will stop us from ruling this country. You will be lost if you don’t vote for Zanu-PF,” said President Emmerson Mnangagwa of Zimbabwe. A bit more arrogant than the usual election pitch in most parts of the world, perhaps, but not unusual in Zimbabwe, one of the African countries suffering from “ruling party syndrome”. There are plenty of military coups and dictatorships elsewhere in Africa. In parts of the Sahel, indeed, they come and go as pointlessly as weather fronts. But the single party that rules for decades and monopolises all is a specialty of southern African countries that.

“No-one will stop us from ruling this country. You will be lost if you don’t vote for Zanu-PF,” said President Emmerson Mnangagwa of Zimbabwe.

A bit more arrogant than the usual election pitch in most parts of the world, perhaps, but not unusual in Zimbabwe, one of the African countries suffering from “ruling party syndrome”.

There are plenty of military coups and dictatorships elsewhere in Africa. In parts of the Sahel, indeed, they come and go as pointlessly as weather fronts. But the single party that rules for decades and monopolises all is a specialty of southern African countries that had to fight liberation wars.

Most of the countries in West and East Africa got their independence in the early ’60s with little or no fighting: the exhausted European empires just gave up and pulled out. One or two had brief anti-colonial insurgencies, like the Mau Mau in Kenya, but the norm is for ethnically based political parties to compete for power more or less democratically.

Further south, where there were powerful white settler minorities, it took long guerilla wars to end European rule.

African ethnic differences still mattered, but most southern African countries, starting with Angola, former Rhodesia and Mozambique and extending all the way down to South Africa, developed militarised liberation movements embracing most or all ethnic groups.

They all won power in the end, of course – but then they stayed together and became the more-or-less permanent ruling party in their country: Zanu (Zimbabwe African National Party) in Zimbabwe, Frelimo in Mozambique, MPLA in Angola, Swapo in Namibia, and the ANC in South Africa.

Swapo and the ANC managed to preserve a democratic political system, mainly because there was not major military action on their own territory except for their northern borders.

And although they utterlydominated their respective political systems, civil rights, free speech and the impartial rule of law survived. So did a fair degree of prosperity.

And then there’s Zimbabwe, where fully one-quarter of the population has moved to the neighbouring countries in search of work and only a quarter of the adults still living at home have regular jobs. Yet the country is not poor; only its people are.

The election was the usual charade, with the outcome determined by Zanu’s control of the media, the police and the courts, but some brave souls still defy it.

Most of them belong to the Citizens’ Coalition for Change (CCC), and they know they won’t win this time. (One of their members was stoned to death by Zanu activists last week.) Yet they will win eventually, because everybody in Zimbabwe – literally everybody – knows the regime is corrupt and the system is rigged.

Robert Mugabe, the hero of the independence war, ruled the country with an iron hand for 37 years until he tried to fire his vice-president, Emmerson Mnangagwa, at the behest of his wife, Grace Mugabe.

Mnangagwa, another liberation war hero (known as “The Crocodile”), overthrew Mugabe instead, but rules in exactly the same imperious and ruthless style. However, he is now 80 and there are no more liberation war heroes coming up behind him.

The ANC in South Africa could lose its majority in parliament in next year’s election, after 29 years of unchallenged rule. It will just acknowledge its defeat and start trying to make some sort of coalition government. In fact, it already has its feelers out.

Zanu-PF has already been in power for longer than (43 years) and its time is also almost up. The transition there may be rougher than that in South Africa, where the ANC never directly controlled the military and the courts always remained independent, but Zanu-PF’s role as Zimbabwe’s eternal “ruling party” is unlikely to survive.

Source: citizen.co.za

Zimbabwe bribed former Malawi leader Joyce Banda, SADC leaders to endorse 2013 elections

Former Malawi leader Joyce Banda in the hook

HARARE-(MaraviPost)-Zimbabwe’s ruling Zanu PF paid US$990 million in bribes to SADC leaders and regional liberation movements to endorse the disputed 2013 elections, a new report by the Centre for Natural Resource Governance (CNRG), claims.

Locating Zanu PF as a beneficiary of illicit election funding, researchers for the study (Mortgaging the Future in Return for Power) found that the liberation movement was selling off state-owned mining claims and minerals to a shadowy network of shelf-companies that eventually delivered the proceeds back to Zanu PF in the form of election funding.

“Official documents gleaned by the research team covering the July 31, 2013 elections give a window to understanding how Zanu PF election funds are sourced and the individuals or companies responsible for underwriting its huge election expenses,” the paper reads.

Adding: “According to the report, a great part of the budget, 67 percent, which amounted to US$2.01 billion, went towards the presidential campaign while US$990 million went towards ‘regional diplomacy’ (next SADC chair, liberation movements) to drum up ‘support for poll credibility before, during and after elections’.

“The so-called ‘regional diplomacy’ is nothing but a euphemism for bribes paid to the SADC Chairperson, then-President Joyce Banda, and liberation movements in the SADC region to proclaim legitimacy to the elections whose credibility Zanu PF anticipated was going to be questioned.”

But former Malawi leader Banda is yet to react on the report allegation.

A Joint Operations Command (JOC) document acquired by the researchers revealed that US$800 million was provided by Chinese miner Anjin and Mbada Diamonds in exchange for tax-free diamond mining rights in Marange, Manicaland province, where vast alluvial diamonds fields where discovered by artisanal miners before the area was violently taken over by the military in 2008 after 35,000 fortune hunters descended on the area. Over 200 were killed.

“The internal document from the CIO (Central Intelligence Organisation) director general’s office, dated 23 May 2013, shows that a total of 16,000 carats were shipped out of Zimbabwe to Angola and Hong Kong between 04 April 2013 and 10 May 2013 and a total US$58 million was realised from the illicit sale of the gems,” CNRG said, appearing to confirm accusations by then (2009 – 2013) finance minister Tendai Biti that Anjin was not remitting diamond proceeds to treasury.

“A further 20,000 carats were shipped out of Zimbabwe to Angola between 11 and 16 May 2013 for an undisclosed fee.

“The same internal CIO document clearly states that the money raised was for ‘Special Interests Projects’ (elections) and part of the shipment was taken to Number 88 Queensway, Hong Kong, ‘on behalf of the Special Interests Projects’ by Air Vice Marshal H. Muchena who, according to another security document, headed the Zanu PF Commissariat together with retired director, Counter Intelligence, Sydney Nyanungo.”

Muchena and Nyanungo are also accused of presiding over a violent quasi-military operation code-named ‘Operation Return to Zanu PF’ funded by the US$800 million provided by Mbanda Diamonds and Anjin.

The researchers also link the violent 2008 presidential run-off to illicit election funding which was used to sponsor the violence.

According to a quoted Zanu PF informant, Bokai mine (Todal Mining (Pvt) Limited) was sold for US$175 million to the Central African Mining and Exploration Company (CAMEC) through an intricate web of shelf companies registered in the British Virgin Islands.

Zanu PF, through the Zimbabwe Mining Development Corporation, “benefited a quick fire of US$100 million from the sale which they used for the bloody June 27 2008 presidential election run-off”.

“The same source revealed that Billy Rautenbach, through Meryweather Investments Limited, got US$75 million from CAMEC in addition to coking coal mining rights in the Hwange Western Areas that he was given by the government of Zimbabwe for arranging the deal”.

Within a month of purchasing Bokai mine for US$175 million, CAMEC valued it at US$1 billion.

“This means that the government of Zimbabwe was prejudiced of US$825 million because of the illegal and desperate sale of the mine,” the researchers concluded.

Adding: “What is clear from the documents is that the Mbada Diamonds deal, just like the Bokai mine deal that funded the 2008 presidential run-off, was structured in a way that involved a lot of shelf companies registered in the British Virgin Islands to obfuscate the ownership structures in a way to suggest there were a lot of things that ZMDC, the government of Zimbabwe and Zanu-PF wanted to conceal.”

Source: zimbabwesituation.com

Zanu-PF says- “ANC delegation won’t meet opposition or civil society in Zimbabwe”

Tony Yengeni is part of an ANC delegation meeting Zanu-PF in a party-to-party gathering in Zimbabwe. File photo. 
Image: City Press/Lucky Nxumalo/Gallo Images

HARARE-(MaraviPost)-A “high-powered” African National Congress (ANC) delegation was expected to arrive in Zimbabwe on Tuesday evening, September 8, 2020, but disclosed that will meet only the ruling Zanu-PF.

The ANC delegation won’t meet the opposition or civil society, according to a statement by Zanu-PF acting secretary for information and publicity Patrick Chinamasa.

“Following inquiries from various quarters and our friends from the media in particular on the purpose of this meeting, Zanu-PF wishes to make it categorically clear that this is a meeting between Zanu-PF and the ANC delegation only,” the statement reads.

A fortnight ago Zanu-PF invited the ANC for a visit, in which the South African ruling party would meet Zanu-PF’s central decision-making body, the politburo.

Zanu-PF secretary for administration Obert Mpofu told journalists that the Ace Magashule-led team that included Lindiwe Zulu, the ANC international relations chair, and Tony Yengeni, the party’s peace and stability committee chair, would be welcomed in Zimbabwe because, “They are the ones with issues, so we will hear from them.”

Zanu-PF added that “the party-to-party meeting” comes against a “backdrop of false say of a nation in crisis”.

Upon learning that the opposition and civic society in Zimbabwe had been sidelined from the meeting, former DA opposition leader Mmusi Maimane tweeted that the mission was a waste of time.

“The ANC delegation must meet all the key stakeholders in Zimbabwe otherwise we are wasting time,” he tweeted. “They must meet the MDC [Alliance], they must meet the key civil society groups, they must meet journalists who have been victimised by Zanu-PF.”

Zimbabwe has since June seen an increase in abductions, torture and the arrests of civic society activists, politicians and journalists.

On Monday at a meeting of war veterans (of the liberation struggle) in Mutare, Zanu-PF political commissar Victor Matemadanda said abductions happened to those who opposed the regime.

“If you are a sell-out, and if you wake up and pursue your sell-out activities while people are sleeping, you will disappear without anyone touching you. This country will deal with you mysteriously. This country is a mystery — you just can’t do as you please,” he warned.

Source: TimesLIVE

Mugabe’s body saga exposes witchcraft beliefs in ZANU PF

HARARE-(MaraviPost)-The decision by the Mugabe family  to cling on to the body of the late former President Robert Mugabe has revealed deep beliefs in and heavy  reliance on witchcraft within Zanu-PF and their political gamesmanship. 

Mugabe did in Singapore on 6 September and when his body was repatriated to Zimbabwe, his family has refused to let the former Zimbabwean leaders casket out of their sight. 

After a state funeral service two weeks ago, the Mugabe family remained with custody of the body believed to be kept at his Blue Roof Mansion. 

According to reports, the family has refused to allow the government to take Mugabe’s body to One Commando Barracks or any other mortuary as they believe that his enemies want to take his organs and use them for rituals to enhance their powers and stay on the throne. 

Mugabe was deposed in a military coup in 2017 and was replaced by President Emmerson Mnangagwa. 

In tbe wake of the Mugabe body debacle, award winning Zimbabwean journalist Hopewell Chin’ono has suggested that an investigation be done to uncover the link between witchcraft and state power. 

“We really need to interrogate the use of Juju in African politics. For Robert Mugabe to insist that his casket should never be in the custody of anyone else other than his family, there is something he knew about how things are done here.That mythical stuff should be talked about,” he said.

Mugabe himself in 2014 accused his then deputy Joice Mujuru of engaging Nigerian inyangas to bewitch him so that she could ascend to the presidency.

Source: zimeye.net

Zimbabwe’s ED bomb; real or another “sympathy symphony”?

There are many unanswered questions around what transpired today in the very province where ED was allegedly poisoned.

I maintain that he was never poisoned, he was just looking for probable cause and enough public sympathy from the people such that when he eventually usurped power from Mugabe, they would not resist his actions and disown his illegitimate regime.

When Jonathan Moyo presented that Blue Ocean document in that famous or infamous politburo meeting, a lot of people, probably including the then president Robert Mugabe actually thought he was lying and just clutching at straws in a bid to force out Mugabe’s former right hand man.

The now infamous “sympathy symphony” began with endless talk of unsanctioned intrusion into ED’s office at Munhumutapa by “unknown” culprits. Unknown even to this day.

The story just did not add up. There was one break-in after another. Nothing was reportedly stolen, yet the “thieves” kept breaking in. The plot was in motion.

The thread of the whole scheme was enlisting public sympathy towards Mnangagwa and portraying an image of a soft vulnerable scared man.

To make the countless break-ins story stick, they even went a step further and poisoned Mnangagwa’s secretary and she ended up in hospital.

There was a large possibility that she might even have lost her life, because cyanide is a very potent poison. Such is the treachery of these men. They do not really care who they sacrifice, as long as their end result is achieved.

The plot to remove Mugabe, was well known amongst service chiefs but they were tight lipped about the whole thing. But as shrewd as Jonathan Moyo is, he managed to sniff it out and expose it, and that is was the prologue of the “sympathy symphony”.

Mnangagwa initially had no need to remove Mugabe. He had nicely positioned himself as the next in line, after he eliminated Joice Mujuru and her husband, the latter dying a sorry and painful death in a mysterious fire that engulfed part of his farmhouse.

What jolted him into action to remove Mugabe was none other than Grace Mugabe, after she, with the help and possible instigation and persuasion from people like Saviour Kasukuwere, Jonathan Moyo, Ignatius Chombo, Patrick Zhuwawo to name but a few, realised that there was too much power vested in her husband, and he was thus untouchable.

If she could manage to eliminate, with the support and protection of her husband, everyone else and position herself as the next in line, she would also inherit a throne that had absolute power and she would rule with an iron fist just as her husband did til she died or decided to hand over power to any one of the men surrounding her.

There was no way Mnangagwa could easily do away with Grace, she was, after all, “his” creation. But she had now amassed too much and there was just no way he could do away with her without enraging her husband.

After the professor’s revelation in that politburo meeting, the die had been cast, Mnangagwa et al had no other option but to remove the first family from Zimbabwean politics.

We all know what happened after the “poisoning scare” part of the sympathy symphony and it is exactly what has led us to where we are now.

Mnangagwa now seeks to gain legitimacy. His plan was progressing well without hiccups as the main opposition leader Morgan Richard Tsvangirayi was ailing.

Suspicion is rife that he was poisoned by ZANU Pf, and some might call it mere coincidence but the timing of Mnangagwa and Chiwenga’s visit to Tsvangirayi at his house was ultimately their farewell to the democrat.

They probably knew that his time had run out and thought, well, why not bid him farewell and score cheap political points in one swoop. He eventually passed on in February at a hospital in South Africa. May his soul rest in eternal peace.

The plan seemed to have succeeded, except for one thing, or rather person, Advocate Nelson Chamisa. Morgan Richard Tsvangirayi lived just long enough for Nelson Chamisa to turn 40, thereby making him eligible to run for presidency.

The flames of democratic change were suddenly reignited and now burned ever so brightly. The young man (by African political standards) truly hit the ground running and became a game changer.

He has galvanised the country with charisma and energy matching that of his predecessor in his prime. He presented a masterpiece of an election manifesto and roadmap for Zimbabwe.

Mnangagwa, having blocked out all other opposition players, in particular Chamisa, from state media, realised that the 40 year old lawmaker was getting unmitigated coverage on social media, deployed intelligence officers across social media platforms to proffer his advance towards a permanent stay at state house for the next 5 years and counter the bullet train crusade that has engulfed social media circles.

They have tried their best but Chamisa’s popularity with his #Godisinit mantra has exponentially grew regardless. Chamisa has not disappointed, keeping his eyes on the ball.

First arm-twisting the electoral body to allow for the opposition parties to also inspect and oversee the manufacture of ballot papers to be used in the election, he has now upped the ante and shifted to the voters’ roll. ZEC had tried its best to stall releasing the voters’ roll.

True to its antics of being a partisan electoral body, gave the British embassy the roll before they gave it to opposition parties just to cast aspersions on lamentations by opposition parties about ZEC’s conduct.

It backfired, and ZEC was left with egg on face. When they did eventually release the roll it did not contain photographs of voters. But as resolute as he has proved, Chamisa is living no stone unturned to get a proper document which will be audited to weed out ghost voters.

In light of this, Mnangagwa has realised that it is becoming increasingly difficult to rig this election because Chamisa and team are out in full force to thwart any chances of rigging the election.

Over and above Chamisa employing a robust election campaign strategy that has seen him campaigning in almost every district in Zimbabwe, election observers keeping a keen interest on all that is taking place here have also made it difficult for Emerson to rig his way to state house.

Chamisa has largely been endorsed by the largely youthful electorate and will no doubt land the top job come July 30. Saturday 23 June and Mnangagwa shockingly pulled out the big guns.

He has gone back to the “sympathy symphony” of his and this time he has used a “bomb”, yes, a real bomb. Lets suppose someone out there wants to kill him, a head of state for that matter, it baffles logic why he/she would take his/her chances by using “that” bomb which, by any stretch of the imagination, judging by the way it blew up, is definitely not the best way to eliminate an individual.

Everything is too amateurish. Maybe if it was a parcel bomb, yah that would work way better than that “bomb” that did not even leave him with a scratch. And if you think about it, how did anyone smuggle a bomb and place it where it was placed without being noticed by the many military and intelligence attachés that are involved in everything that the president does and everywhere he goes?

It is public knowledge that dictators fear death because they have killed too many people and thus have too many enemies, and everyone knows, even the grass at the venue of a rally is carefully scrutinised to ensure there is no hope of anyone or anything threatening the life of the president.

But, in spite of all that security, a “bomb” was smuggled nonetheless, placed somewhere very close to where the VIP were to sit, undetected, missed by all the army and intelligence personnel when they conducted a sweep of the venue before the president arrived, and remained there for who knows how long, only to be detonated just as Mnangagwa was passing.

If it really was an assassination attempt it definitely was the poorest I have ever seen. We have seen way better assassinations on many television shows. Would it not have been easier and more effective if they (the people who want him dead) had just hired a professional sniper to do a clean and perfect job?

Too many questions people, which only points to the fact that this is yet another Mnangagwa “sympathy symphony”. Noo Mr. President, Zimbabwe is sick and tired of your childish antics.

Grant us our reforms, level the playing field and we will obliterate you and your party into oblivion once and for all.

Zimbabwe does not need all this unnecessary drama from you trying to divert attention from the election and gain public sympathy.

From signing deals with shelf companies to detonating bombs at your rallies, we have had enough iwe mhani.

My fellow Zimbabweans, we should not let these clueless manipulative despotic tyrannical evil men play Russian roulette with our lives. Let us vote them out once and for all. I rest my case. This Mnangagwa

Comrade Bob’s ouster points to ailment of liberation movements

Robert Mugae
Zimbabwe

By CHRISTOPHER KAYUMBA

Comrade Robert Mugabe is now the former president of Zimbabwe. And his departure was met with wild jubilations.

What was surprising was the manner in which he “resigned.” You see, in the management of state affairs, there are certain things no one expects the military to do.

No military has in the past staged coups by first calling a press conference to announce its actions. Doing so would be suicidal. But, that is what happened in Zimbabwe.

Surrounded by other generals, the head of the armed forces, Constantino Chiwenga, called a press conference to warn that unless purges in the ruling ZANU-PF party stopped, the military would intervene and fix the situation.

Astonishingly, the general was allowed — even after his treasonous words — to go back home, rest and return in the wee hours of the morning to snatch power from his boss in what was tactfully termed as removing the “criminals” surrounding the president.

The military was quick to emphasise in a televised address that Mugabe was still the president and their commander-in-chief. However, the man Mugabe dismissed two weeks earlier, former vice president Emmerson Mnangagwe, was announced the new president.

It’s mind-boggling. But as Rwandans would say, that’s Zimbabwean Ubudasa (uniqueness).

Bloodless “coup”

We have to give it up to the Zimbabwean military. The “coup” was bloodless and they managed to convince both ZANU-PF and parliament to legalise their actions.

We must now ask what Mugabe’s forced resignation tells us about Africa’s struggles and its governance.

This question is important because, despite Mugabe’s many failings, he is a hero of the liberation struggle and the fight against colonialism.

Yet, despite his contributions and the great expectations at Independence in 1980, the only substantive achievement Mugabe leaves behind after 37 years at the helm is the flag of independence, but not its fruits.

For while popular and successful in his early years, as many African leaders tend to be, in his later years he ruled by defiance as the economy tanked.

But of course, while defiance arouses emotions, it doesn’t develop an economy or bring sustainable stability.
Clearly, the greatest lesson Mugabe leaves us is that every cause and struggle has its own heroes.
For while Mugabe was undoubtedly good at defiance; including rhetorically dismissing imperialists, these aren’t the qualities needed to bring sustainable democracy nor end underdevelopment.
That tells us that for Zimbabwe to attain sustainable democracy and development, it will need new heroes.

“Liberations”

The second lesson is that it is possible to fight one form of tyranny only to install another. Yes, Mugabe fought colonialists and dethroned white colonial rule.

But he replaced it with an entitled ZANU-PF whose legitimacy resides in fighting for independence and not putting in place a democratic dispensation where ONLY the will of the people truly reigns.

In part, this is also the tragedy of some African countries that have experienced cycles of “liberations” with each group of “liberators” only helping to remove one form of tyranny only to install another.

Mugabe’s rule and downfall illustrate an ailment associated with “liberation movements” and the entitlement that often ruins progress. Even the struggle to remove him was stamped by a sense of entitlement.

His “liberation struggle” comrades were saying he played an important part in the past and therefore must be replaced with another “liberation” comrade.

Despite our claim to love the rule of law and constitutionalism, at heart, we do not because even with ZANU-PF and government officials saying theirs was a rule of law, when the military intervened (which is illegal), everyone asked Mugabe to go.

We thus learn where real power lies in most African countries — with the military. Once a leader falls out of favour with the military it is game over.

In the end, while the role of the military is traditionally perceived to be one of keeping external enemies out, clearly, Zimbabwe teaches us that the enemy lies within and the solution is military intervention.

Until the military returns to the barracks, we can’t talk of sustainable democracy. This is not to disprove its deed against Mugabe; but, stating a fact.

Christopher Kayumba, PhD. Senior Lecturer, School of Journalism and Communication, UR; Lead consultant, MGC Consult International Ltd. E-mail: ckayumba@yahoo.com; twitter account: @Ckayumba Website:www.mgcconsult.com

Grace Mugabe accuses rival Emmerson Mnangagwa of plotting to overthrow her husband’s Government

Robart and Grace Mugabe
President Robert Mugabe kisses first lady Grace Mugabe during Zimbabwe’s 37th Independence Day celebrations in April.

Flamboyant Zimbabwe’s First Lady Grace Mugabe has warned of a possible coup plot amid growing tensions in the fight to succeed her husband comrade Robert Mugabe.

She says allies of Vice-President Emmerson Mnangagwa are threatening the lives of those who don’t support him to replace President Robert Mugabe, 93.
Mrs Mugabe herself and Mr Mnangagwa are the front-runners and their rivalry has split the governing Zanu-PF.

The row comes after Mr Mnangagwa claimed that he was poisoned in August. Continue reading Grace Mugabe accuses rival Emmerson Mnangagwa of plotting to overthrow her husband’s Government

Zimbabwean President Mugabe angry over Joyce Mujuru ‘death plot’

Zimbabwe’s president has spoken of his anger that his embattled deputy Joyce Mujuru allegedly plotted to assassinate him and accused her of being a thief.

Speaking at the ruling Zanu-PF party’s congress, Robert Mugabe said he would act against all corrupt officials.

Mrs Mujuru’s absence from the congress showed she was “scared”, he added.

Recently expelled Zanu-PF member Rugare Gumbo accused the 90-year-old leader of “completely” turning the party into his “personal property”.

Mr Mugabe had targeted Mrs Mujuru to advance the “fortunes” of his wife Grace, the former Zanu-PF spokesman added.

Mrs Mujuru, who has previously denied the allegations, had been seen as a potential successor to Mr Mugabe, with whom she fought for Zimbabwe’s independence from white-minority rule.

However, her career ran into trouble when Mrs Grace Mugabe entered into politics this year, and accused her of plotting against her husband.

The congress, being held in the capital Harare, is expected to elect the first lady as the head of Zanu-PF’s women’s wing.

‘Bribing delegates’

Mr Mugabe, who has ruled Zimbabwe since independence in 1980, will remain as Zanu-PF leader.

He told thousands of delegates that he welcomed the fact that his wife had exposed Mrs Mujuru’s attempt to oust him.

“Thieves never succeed… look at all the transgressions. Her corruption is now exposed,” Mr Mugabe said.