In a recent publication, openDemocracy has presented a misleading narrative with regard to the followers of Prophet TB Joshua and the Synagogue Church of All Nations (SCOAN). The article accuses them of attempting to suppress TB Joshua’s alleged “victim”. While it is essential to address any form of abuse and misinformation, it is equally crucial to scrutinize the credibility of such claims and explore the broader context. This rebuttal aims to shed light on the perceived bias in openDemocracy’s report and present a more comprehensive perspective.
The article notes that YouTube and Apple have taken action against SCOAN and its followers based on reports of abusive content. However, it is crucial to strike a balance between enforcing policies and allowing diverse viewpoints. There is the need to scrutinize the methodology and criteria used to identify abusive content, ensuring a fair and unbiased assessment.
The removal of SCOAN-related content by YouTube and Apple, as reported by openDemocracy, prompts concerns about censorship. The protection of free speech is paramount on all social media platforms. Suppressing the free speech of supporters of Prophet TB Joshua and the SCOAN hinders their ability to present evidence, counter allegations, and amounts to stifling opposing perspectives. The right to free expression and a fair hearing should be extended to all parties involved.
Your so-called investigation outlines instances of cyberbullying, discrimination, and spreading of misinformation by SCOAN supporters. However, that is actually what openDemocracy and the disgraced BBC are doing against TB Joshua and SCOAN by spreading misinformation about the ministry.
The documentary produced by the BBC, in collaboration with openDemocracy, is cited as a catalyst for an upsurge in abusive content. Nonetheless, it has been asserted that the mentioned documentary has been proven to be false and fabricated. There exists no concrete evidence from the accusers of Prophet TB Joshua and SCOAN; the movie or documentary was an orchestrated act. The anticipation for any evidence against the ministry remains unfulfilled.
The question that cannot be dismissed is why these accusations find amplification through online platforms and documentary-style productions rather than being pursued through legal channels. If justice is indeed the primary objective, one might question why legal systems are not resorted to for a thorough investigation and due process. The preference for an online campaign over legal avenues raises doubts about the true intent behind the endeavor. If Bisola and Ajoke claim they are victims according to the openDemocracy reports, it is imperative to stress the significance of seeking legal recourse, pursuing legal avenues is the appropriate course of action to establish the truth and ensure accountability, instead of campaign of calumny against the person of Prophet TB Joshua and blasphemous remark against the work of God.
As Christians, faith healing and deliverance are an integral part of our religious beliefs. SCOAN’s emphasis on prayer and faith aligns with these foundational principles. It is crucial for openDemocracy and others to respect and acknowledge the diversity of faith practices, recognizing that differing beliefs coexist within our global community.
The call for Google Play and Apple’s App Store to reassess hosting the Emmanuel TV app raises concerns about potential institutional persecution. It is essential to differentiate between responsible hosting of diverse religious content and an infringement on religious freedoms. Institutions must strike a balance that respects the plurality of beliefs.
The global community is characterized by religious diversity, and any reassessment of hosting applications should be done with the understanding that diverse faith practices contribute to this richness. Upholding the freedom for individuals to access content aligned with their beliefs is fundamental to fostering a tolerant and inclusive society.
SCOAN has consistently maintained a stance of not imposing its beliefs on individuals. The call for reassessment should take into account the voluntary nature of engagement with religious content. Individuals have the autonomy to choose content that aligns with their faith, and this freedom must be safeguarded.
Instead of advocating for reassessment, we propose fostering open dialogue and understanding between stakeholders. Respectful conversations that acknowledge religious diversity and promote mutual understanding contribute to a harmonious coexistence of different faiths in the digital space.
Preserving religious freedom is a cornerstone of a democratic society. Any actions that may impact the hosting of religious content should be approached cautiously, ensuring that these actions do not inadvertently infringe upon the rights of individuals to freely practice their faith.
openDemocracy’s coverage of the situation appears to carry an inherent bias against TB Joshua and SCOAN. The absence of objective journalism, reliance on unverified sources, and the selective presentation of information contribute to an atmosphere of suspicion. A comprehensive and impartial investigation should encompass all perspectives to arrive at a fair and just conclusion.
Amidst the allegations, it become obvious that those accusing TB Joshua are financially supported with the intent to tarnish the esteemed reputation of the Prophet and launch an assault against the Church of God. The orchestrated nature of these attacks raises questions about the ulterior motives driving the accusations.
Despite the tumult of allegations, the Church stands unwavering in its faith and commitment to defend the Christian Faith. The conviction that the gates of hell shall not prevail against the Church, as affirmed by the Bible, instills confidence that truth will ultimately triumph over falsehood. The steadfast belief in victory through Christ Jesus serves as the cornerstone of our defense.
Recognizing the spiritual dimension of the conflict, we perceive the attacks as a manifestation of spiritual warfare. The Apostle Paul’s counsel in Ephesians 6:12 resonates profoundly, underscoring that the struggle is not against flesh and blood but against spiritual forces. The defense against these accusations extends beyond the physical realm, involving prayer and spiritual discernment.
The prevailing message is one of victory in Christ Jesus. Despite the challenges and orchestrated attacks, our faith remains unshaken. The assurance that Christ has already secured the ultimate triumph over adversity serves as the anchor fortifying our defense.
