By Burnett Munthali
The question of whether Professor Arthur Peter Mutharika (APM) or Pastor Lazarus Chakwera has been a better leader for Malawi invites a critical comparative analysis of their governance, economic management, and adherence to democratic principles. While both leaders have faced challenges, Mutharika’s leadership stands out as more effective in fostering economic stability, upholding democracy, and respecting institutional independence.
Democracy and governance
Professor Arthur Peter Mutharika was a staunch advocate for democracy, consistently respecting the judiciary and allowing citizens to exercise their rights. When the Constitutional Court annulled the 2019 presidential election results, Mutharika respected the court’s decision despite the ruling being against him. His administration also permitted peaceful protests without resorting to excessive force. This demonstrated a commitment to democratic principles, even under challenging circumstances.
In contrast, Chakwera’s administration has been criticized for suppressing dissent. Instances of police brutality against peaceful protesters and opposition members have marred his leadership. His administration’s actions have often been perceived as an erosion of the democratic ideals that formed the cornerstone of his campaign.
Economic management and delivery
Under Mutharika, Malawi witnessed significant infrastructural developments, including road networks, community technical colleges, and energy projects such as the Malawi Rural Electrification Program (MAREP). His administration maintained economic stability, fostering growth in agriculture and trade.
Chakwera, on the other hand, came into office with promises of creating one million jobs and revitalizing the economy. However, his tenure has been characterized by rising unemployment, unfulfilled promises, and a deteriorating economy. Many citizens feel disillusioned by his focus on international travel at the expense of addressing pressing domestic issues.
Fighting corruption
Mutharika’s administration faced corruption allegations, but he allowed the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) to operate with some degree of independence. Notably, scandals such as the cement case were investigated without interference.
Chakwera’s administration, despite initial promises to combat corruption, has been overshadowed by high-profile scandals involving senior officials. The arrest of ACB Director General Martha Chizuma at dawn by armed officers marked a low point, signaling a lack of commitment to fighting corruption and undermining the bureau’s independence. This incident deeply eroded public trust in his leadership.
Economic hardships and poverty
Chakwera’s tenure has been marred by economic hardships that have left many Malawians in despair. The devaluation of the Kwacha has drastically reduced purchasing power, while high inflation rates have driven up the cost of basic goods. Frequent fuel shortages and skyrocketing unemployment have further compounded the economic challenges. The failure to deliver on campaign promises has left citizens increasingly impoverished and disillusioned.
In contrast, Mutharika managed to maintain the stability of the Kwacha, ensuring controlled inflation and affordable prices for essential commodities. His administration also prioritized food security through initiatives like fertilizer and maize subsidies.
Public sentiment and leadership legacy
The economic and social challenges under Chakwera’s leadership have led to widespread dissatisfaction, with some Malawians resorting to extreme measures such as suicide due to rising poverty and hopelessness. On the other hand, Mutharika’s tenure, while not without difficulties, provided a relatively stable economic environment and greater public confidence in leadership.
Final analysis
In comparing the leadership of Professor Arthur Peter Mutharika and Pastor Lazarus Chakwera, it becomes evident that Mutharika’s governance was marked by greater adherence to democratic principles, better economic management, and a more robust commitment to institutional independence. Chakwera’s administration, despite its promises, has failed to deliver on key fronts, leaving many Malawians frustrated and disillusioned.
Verdict
Professor Arthur Peter Mutharika emerges as the better leader, having demonstrated effective governance, economic stability, and respect for democratic values. His tenure left Malawi in a stronger position compared to the current state under Pastor Lazarus Chakwera.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in the article are those of the author not necessarily represent those of the The Maravi Post or Editor
Comments
2 responses to “Who is the better leader: Professor Arthur Peter Mutharika or Pastor Lazarus Chakwera?”
Kamuzu had all these to ensure that we have Forex at the reserve bank of Malawi
My big question is what did UDF and DPP governments left to Malawians that we are now harvesting or we we are generating income ( Forex) like what Ngwazi did .
Today UDF and DPP are thought to be good economically yet they are the ones who have destroyed the foundations of the economy of our beloved country.
I totally disagree with the writer. I am a businessman based in Lilongwe. One day I sat down and asked myself what’s wrong with Malawi economy? The biggest problem that we have in Malawi is that we don’t have income (Forex ) generating activities.
During the time of Dr Kamuzu Banda I remember we had Press Farming which was bringing Forex to the country through tobacco sales. David Whitehead was also one of Forex earner in this warm heart of Africa. Cotton farmers were doing very well through sales of cotton to David Whitehead. Look at companies Malawi had like Lever Brothers which were distributing cooking oils , soap and surf where are these today? We had PTC, Kandodo, Macconnel Chipiku. Where have they gone. Chikangawa forest was well known because of pine trees which was bringing Forex to this country. Foreigners flooded this country of ours cutting down trees wantonly.
Kamuzu had all these to ensure