Under withering cross-examination petitioner 1, Saulosi Chilima on Friday invalidated and abandoned the narrative that the correction fluid tippex was used to rig elections.
Attorney General also asked Chilima if the result sheets altered by tippex affected the results. Chilima confirmed that results were not affected by the alterations and the results were true reflections of the National votes, but he is only concerned with procedures.
The attorney General then grilled Chilima if there can be any difference between documents corrected by tippex and those by a pen cancel out. Chilima said there is no difference.
Attorney General also asked Chilima if the result sheets altered by tippex affected the results. Chilima confirmed that results were not affected by the alterations and the results were true reflections of the National votes, but he is only concerned with procedures.
The cross examination has revealed that although Chilima has used tippex narrative as evidence of vote rigging, he doesn’t have any evidence in court to prove the same.
According to reports the frustrated UTM and MCP Lawyers have applied in the Constitutional Court to have President Peter Mutharika and MEC chairperson Justice Jane Ansah summoned to court for the on-going high-profile presidential election results case.
If this ridiculous request was ever granted the Judges will need to be marched in the public square naked for prolonging this meritless power grab by sole losers of a fair Election.
Jane Ansah followed the law and declared the right winner of these Elections Period.
Comments
4 responses to “The Tippex case is dissolving and now ridiculous request to call APM to revive their hopes”
Eliwn you need to consult local attorneys in your area before you post an article relating to court matters. You are misleading people
This is worst reporting ihave come across all my life,you sound so ignorant to me,in case uhave forgotten,this is just the beginning of court hearing,if you had some brains left you,,would have waited and then write this bullshit of yours.
Steve – First to show I have an open mind I will allow you your accusatory comment to stand and use My real name to reply. In my opinion and I stress mine there was no fraud Peter Mutharika won. However I allow on this Publication diverse opinion from educated and smart opinion writers such as Patseni Mauka and Allan Ntata who disagree with me. However we are never Personal when we disagree. Infact The Maravi Post was created to be Open and opinions such as yours are allowed as long as you do not call people names.
Do not dilute your arguements by being personal. If you hacve something to say go ahead send your opinion I will publish without sensor. Thats what Maravi Post is. Free and Fair
Elwin, I’m sure you have never litigate the case. Some of the questions AG ask has a reverse bite. For instance if UTM attorney ask mec officers whom AG said are right people to complain that why they did not do so after see some of the vote suspicious?
That can mean that even they saw mistakes they did not take initiative to correct. Another evidence is the chairwomam’s interview. Don’t look too much on chilima look on mec officers . That is where the game ends.