By Burnett Munthali
Lawyer Alexious Kamangila’s Facebook post is a scathing critique of the current administration, accusing it of hypocrisy, corruption, and a blatant disregard for national security.
His argument is built on historical references, specific incidents, and a strong appeal to the collective memory of Malawians who expected change but instead feel betrayed.
At the heart of Kamangila’s critique is the assertion that the ruling government is engaging in corrupt activities at a scale three times worse than the previous administration.
This comparison is significant because the current government came to power on a platform of reform, accountability, and justice.
Yet, Kamangila argues that the very acts that led to public outrage against the past regime are now being repeated—if not exceeded—by the current leadership.
One of the most damning allegations concerns the case of Uladi Mussa, the former cabinet minister who was jailed for selling Malawian passports to foreigners.
Kamangila reminds his audience that Mussa’s actions were not just a crime but a national betrayal, as passports are key security documents that determine who can enter and leave a country.
Despite this, the government released Mussa from prison under the pretext of ill health, only for him to be seen actively participating in political meetings.
This, according to Kamangila, is evidence of selective justice—where criminals are only punished when it suits the political interests of those in power.
Kamangila then shifts his attention to an even more alarming issue—the government’s decision to grant a diplomatic passport to a Nigerian national with a criminal record.
A diplomatic passport is a highly sensitive document, usually reserved for individuals representing the nation on official duties.
By granting such a privilege to a known criminal, the government not only endangered Malawi’s international reputation but also raised serious concerns about national security.
The circumstances surrounding the issuance of this diplomatic passport further expose the level of irregularities within the system.
Kamangila notes that the passport application process was initiated after 5 PM—outside government working hours—immediately after the Nigerian individual met with the President.
Such an expedited process raises questions about the influence and decision-making within the highest offices of government.
Former President Bakili Muluzi is also implicated in this controversy.
Kamangila calls Muluzi a “kam’dala kadyera kwambiri” (a greedy old man) and accuses him of being part of the corrupt elite that has been benefiting from Malawi’s resources for decades.
He extends this critique to Muluzi’s son, Atupele, questioning whether he has ever earned wealth outside his father’s influence.
This suggests that Kamangila sees Malawi’s politics as a cycle of dynastic corruption, where a few privileged families continue to exploit national resources, regardless of which party is in power.
The post also touches on the role of big business in sustaining corruption.
Kamangila mentions Thom Mpinganjira, a businessman previously implicated in banking fraud during the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) era, who he claims is now benefitting under the Malawi Congress Party (MCP) government.
This reinforces the argument that corruption in Malawi is not about political affiliation but rather about access to power and resources.
Kamangila then issues a direct challenge to Malawi’s immigration officers, Homeland Security, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, demanding an explanation for how a criminal was granted a diplomatic passport.
His demand underscores a broader frustration with the lack of accountability in government institutions, where …
