By Jones Gadama
The Malawi government’s Road Traffic (Prescribed Offences and Penalties) Regulations, 2026, published under Government Notice No. 38 on 8th May 2026, presents itself as a bold step toward road safety.
The new fines are steep, deliberately so. Driving without a licence will now cost K200,000. Using a phone while driving attracts K50,000. Driving without insurance for private vehicles can hit K100,000. The list goes on, with penalties ranging from K10,000 for missing a warning triangle to K800,000 for uninsured public service vehicles.
On paper, the message is clear: road rules are now expensive, drive smart, not emotional. In practice, the primary beneficiaries will not be the state’s coffers, nor the victims of road accidents, but the traffic police officers who enforce these rules on Malawi’s roads.
The most corrupt department in the country is the traffic police, and these hiked penalties are a license for them to print money.
The intention behind the regulations may be in good faith. Road carnage in Malawi is a national crisis. Reckless driving, overloading, drunk driving, and mobile phone use behind the wheel kill hundreds every year.
Higher fines are meant to deter these behaviors. Deterrence works only when enforcement is credible, consistent, and free from corruption. In Malawi, traffic enforcement fails on all three counts. The structure of the new penalties creates a perfect environment for on-the-spot bribery, and the traffic police are positioned to exploit it fully.
The treasury, represented by “account number 1,” will see little to nothing from these fines. The money will stay in the pockets of officers and their networks.
Look at the numbers. Forgetting your driving licence now attracts a K200,000 fine. That is more than the monthly salary of most Malawians. No driver wants to face that fine, wait for a court date, or have their vehicle impounded. The incentive to settle on the roadside is overwhelming. A traffic officer demanding K50,000 to “make the matter disappear” is not making a demand. They are offering a discount. The driver saves K150,000 and time. The officer pockets K50,000 tax-free in five minutes. Multiply that by ten drivers in a single shift at a busy roadblock, and one constable makes K500,000 in a day. That is K10 million in a month if the officer works twenty days. These are not speculative figures. They are the arithmetic of corruption made possible by the new regulations.
Using a phone while driving now carries a K50,000 fine. The same officer will settle for K20,000. No receipt, no record, no entry into government accounts. Driving without insurance, up to K100,000 for private vehicles, will be settled for K30,000. No seatbelt, K15,000 per passenger, becomes K5,000 per passenger in the officer’s pocket. Speeding fines range from K20,000 to K90,000 depending on excess speed. The discretion is entirely with the officer. An officer can decide you were 30 km/h over the limit instead of 20 km/h, push you toward the higher bracket, and then offer to reduce it for K25,000 cash. The higher the official fine, the higher the bribe. That is the direct incentive created by these regulations.
The corruption is not limited to bribes for minor offenses. The structure encourages fabrication. A driver with a valid licence can be accused of “driving without a licence” if the officer claims the licence is not in the system. A vehicle with valid insurance can be declared “no insurance” if the officer refuses to check the certificate. The threat of a K200,000 or K100,000 fine makes most drivers comply. The officer knows this. The regulations give them leverage, and leverage in a corrupt system is currency.
The result is predictable. Traffic police constables who join the service with meagre salaries find themselves wealthy within a year or two. Within twelve months of deployment, many own more than three minibuses and saloon cars. They build houses in high-density areas, send their children to private schools, and run businesses through proxies. Their salaries cannot explain this wealth. The cash comes from roadblocks, checkpoints, and the discretion to let offenses go for a fee. The new fines will accelerate this accumulation. The traffic police will be richer than before, richer than most civil servants, richer than many businessmen. They will be the richest enforcers on earth relative to their official pay.
This is not new. Malawians have complained for years about roadblocks that function as tollgates. The difference now is scale. When the official fine for driving without a licence was K20,000, the bribe was K5,000. Now the fine is K200,000, so the bribe rises proportionally. The state has increased the stakes without fixing the referee. It is like giving a referee with a gambling problem control over a billion-kwacha match. The outcome is not in doubt.
The Anti-Corruption Bureau should flex its muscle here. Asset investigations should not be reserved for politicians and senior civil servants. The traffic police must be included. The ACB should conduct lifestyle audits on traffic officers, starting with those deployed to high-traffic routes in Lilongwe, Blantyre, Mzuzu, and along the M1. How does a constable earning K150,000 per month acquire three minibuses within two years? Where does the cash come from? How are the vehicles registered? Who are the proxies? The same thorough probes that have brought down politicians for dubious wealth accumulation should be applied to the traffic police. If a politician loses all their assets after a conviction, a traffic officer should face the same fate. Wealth amassed through corruption is wealth amassed through corruption, regardless of the office.
The regulations also create opportunities for harassment. “Failing to stop for traffic officers” is K50,000. An officer can wave a driver to stop unnecessarily, and if the driver is slow to respond, charge them. “Hooting unnecessarily” is K30,000. In a traffic jam, who decides what is necessary? The officer decides, and the decision is negotiable. “Throwing rubbish from a vehicle” is K50,000. A passenger dropping a sweet wrapper can trigger that fine. The discretion is too broad, and in a corrupt system, broad discretion means broad corruption.
The argument that higher fines will improve compliance assumes that people fear the law more than they fear the officer. In Malawi, people fear the officer more. They know the law is negotiable on the roadside. They know that if they refuse to pay, the officer can delay them for hours, find another offense, or impound the vehicle. The cost of compliance with the law becomes higher than the cost of corruption. That is a policy failure.
If the government was serious about using these fines to improve road safety, the money would be ring-fenced for trauma care, road maintenance, and public education. It is not. The fines go into general government revenue, and the public has no visibility on how they are used. Meanwhile, the cash collected on the roadside is immediate, untraceable, and untaxed. Account number 1 will not benefit. The traffic police will.
This is why the ACB must act. Wealth accumulation among traffic police is not a secret. It is visible in the neighborhoods where they live, in the vehicles they operate, and in the businesses they run. The bureau has the mandate to investigate unexplained wealth. It should use it. The investigation should cover officers from constable to superintendent rank in the traffic directorate. It should include bank records, mobile money transactions, and property registrations. Where the wealth cannot be explained by lawful income, the assets should be seized and the officers prosecuted.
The public will support this. Malawians are tired of paying bribes to avoid fines they cannot afford. They are tired of seeing roadblocks that serve only to enrich officers. They are tired of a system where the rich can buy their way out and the poor are left stranded. The new regulations, if left unchecked, will deepen this inequality and entrench corruption further.
Road safety matters. Lives matter. But safety will not come from fines alone. It will come from enforcement that is fair, transparent, and accountable. That requires fixing the traffic police before fixing the penalties. Until then, the Road Traffic (Prescribed Offences and Penalties) Regulations, 2026, will serve one purpose: making the traffic police the richest department in Malawi, one bribe at a time.
Leave a Reply