Arrested for breaking Ramadan
A Tunisian protester holds a placard which in French reads: “Why is it bothering you if you fast and I eat?”

Why are western nations taking responsibility for the radicalization of Muslims, when the problem is not confined to these countries? Why are these countries buying into this lame narrative that ascribes blame for Islamic extremism to western foreign policy?


Obvious such a position discounts the hateful and inciting of doctrines that are propagated in mosques, and other Islamic centers worldwide.


Bearing in mind similar manifestations of Muslim extremist ideology in other non-western countries, it is difficult to hold that western foreign policy or the internet is the main reason behind the current manifestations of radical Islam in the West, or the world.


Look at the recent case in Tunisia. This North Africa nation has often been portrayed as a beacon of ‘moderate Islam’.


But this may not actually be the case. From what is going on in the country, Tunisia is far from being moderate. Evidence of homegrown radical Islam abounds.


Radical Islam resonates in the recent decision of a court that jailed people for eating during the month of Ramadan. The prosecution spokesperson said the people were convicted for “a provocative act” of eating and smoking during the fasting period.


Now, how is this ruling in agreement with the so-called moderate Islam in Tunisia? Is this ruling a marker of liberal and tolerant Islam? Not at all.


How is this sentencing in compliance with the oft-referred provision in the Quran that there is no compulsion in religion?


If people should not be compelled to practice religion, in this case, Islam, why should persons, Muslims or not, be penalized for eating during the month of Ramadan?


Why was the act of eating or smoking during the month of Ramadan described as provocative? Who was it provocative to? To those who were fasting?


What does it mean to provoke those who were fasting? If they were provoked, and so what? What were they provoked to do? To eat or smoke?


Definitely not.


To attack those who eat? Most probably. So this sentencing was surely a way to appease the radicals, the jihadists lest they unleash mayhem on the eating Muslims.


This is an affirmation of the power, influence and presence of extreme Islamic ideology in Tunisia.


So it is pertinent to state that radical Islam is not a new phenomenon or a western creation. Radical Islam has existed and been in full force before the advent of the Internet and in spite of online media.


Islamism is rooted somewhere beyond and besides the websites. The fear of radical Muslims drive policies and decisions in Muslim majority states, and communities even if it means putting innocent people behind bars. Thus there is no basis to continue attributing radical Islam to online and internet facilities, when Islamism narratives are codified in legislations that prevail in Muslim majority countries such as Pakistan, Nigeria and Indonesia.


The views expressed in this article are not those of the Publisher or the Editor.

The Maravi Post has over one billion views since its inception in December of 2009. Viewed in over 100 countries Follow US: Twitter @maravipost Facebook Page : maravipost Instagram: maravipost    
NBS Bank Your Caring Bank