Gift Trapence’s tenure as chairperson of the Human Rights Defenders Coalition (HRDC) was marked not by the defense of human rights, but by a disturbing silence that betrayed the very principles he was supposed to uphold.
His leadership was characterized by a blatant disregard for accountability, a failure to condemn state-sponsored atrocities, and an outright neglect of his duties as a defender of justice.
Instead of serving as a moral compass in Malawi’s turbulent political landscape, Trapence became, whether intentionally or not, a passive observer, and in some cases, an active enabler of oppressive acts committed by the MCP regime and its security apparatus.
From the outset, it was evident that Trapence’s role was compromised.
His apparent allegiance to the MCP was palpable, and his failure to speak out against the brutal crackdown on opposition supporters, especially DPP members, was a glaring omission.
During his time at the helm of HRDC, Malawi was subjected to a wave of repression, with opposition rallies forcibly dispersed, opposition figures harassed, and dissenting voices silenced through intimidation and violence.
Instead of condemning these acts, Trapence chose silence or, at best, muted statements that failed to hold the MCP regime accountable for its acts of brutality.
This silence was not only deafening but also revealing—an indication that HRDC under his leadership was more interested in maintaining a facade of neutrality than in advocating for human rights and justice.
It is crucial to recall that during Trapence’s tenure, Malawi witnessed some of the most egregious abuses of human rights in recent history.
Police brutality was rampant, with officers unleashing violence on peaceful protesters, journalists, and opposition supporters alike.
Tear gas, live ammunition, and brutal beatings became commonplace.
Yet, Trapence, as the supposed voice of human rights defenders, did not condemn these abuses in a manner that would galvanize international or national outrage.
Instead, he opted for a cautious approach, perhaps fearing repercussions from the regime or harboring sympathies that compromised his moral integrity.
His failure to speak out against police excesses was a betrayal of his duty as a human rights advocate and a betrayal of the victims whose rights he was supposed to defend.
Moreover, Trapence’s leadership was marred by a stark and troubling hypocrisy.
While he claimed to champion democracy and the rule of law, his actions—or lack thereof—suggested a complicity with the MCP’s authoritarian tendencies.
His silence on the suppression of opposition voices, and the unconstitutional detention of dissenters demonstrated a selective approach to justice.
Instead of standing as a defender of all Malawians’ rights, Trapence appeared to prioritize political stability over justice, enabling the MCP to entrench its power at the expense of democratic principles and human dignity.
One of the most disturbing aspects of Trapence’s tenure was his evident failure to hold the MCP regime accountable for its atrocities.
Instead of being a watchdog and a voice for the oppressed, he often appeared to be a spectator, watching helplessly as the regime continued its crackdown on dissent.
This passivity effectively rendered HRDC a mouthpiece for the regime’s narrative rather than an independent defender of human rights.
The organization’s credibility was compromised, and its reputation as a defender of justice was eroded beyond repair.
It is no exaggeration to say that HRDC under Trapence’s leadership lost its moral authority, functioning more as a political tool for MCP sympathizers than as a genuine defender of human rights.
The disbanding of HRDC, therefore, is not only justified but necessary.
The organization’s failure to act decisively against human rights violations committed by the regime has rendered it irrelevant and compromised.
An organization that cannot stand up against state brutality, that cannot condemn enforced disappearances, torture, and extrajudicial killings, has no moral standing to continue functioning as a human rights defender.
HRDC’s silence and inaction have effectively made it an accomplice in Malawi’s descent into authoritarianism.
Trapence’s personal conduct further underscores his shortcomings.
His reluctance to openly condemn the regime’s abuses was not merely a strategic miscalculation; it was a moral failure.
By choosing silence or cautious language, he effectively endorsed the regime’s oppressive tactics.
This silence, in the face of brutality, is a form of complicity—it signals acceptance or, at the very least, a toleration of injustice. Such a stance is unacceptable for anyone entrusted with the defense of human rights.
Leaders in this space are supposed to be courageous, unwavering, and unafraid to confront injustice, regardless of political consequences.
Trapence’s leadership, by contrast, was marked by timidity and a failure to live up to these standards.
Furthermore, his inability to challenge police brutality and state-sponsored violence reflects a deeper failure to understand or prioritize the core values of human rights advocacy.
Instead of mobilizing the public, condemning abuses, and demanding accountability, Trapence’s organization remained largely silent or issued lukewarm statements.
This lack of leadership emboldened the regime and further marginalized victims of state violence.
It also betrayed the very principles of human rights that HRDC was supposed to uphold—principles of justice, dignity, and equality.
Trapence’s tenure also revealed an alarming tendency to prioritize political expediency over human rights.
His failure to condemn the MCP’s crackdown on opposition protests was a clear sign that his organization had become entangled in political favoritism.
This is especially troubling given the importance of impartiality in human rights work.
When defenders of human rights become partisan actors, their credibility is compromised, and their ability to serve as independent monitors of abuses is severely undermined.
HRDC under Trapence, therefore, drifted from being a neutral watchdog to a biased supporter of the regime’s interests.
In essence, Trapence’s leadership has been a tragic failure—a missed opportunity to stand up against tyranny, to defend the oppressed, and to uphold the integrity of human rights advocacy in Malawi.
His inability or unwillingness to condemn atrocities, his apparent sympathies with the MCP, and his failure to act decisively have all contributed to the deterioration of Malawi’s democratic space.
It is not an overstatement to say that his leadership has been a distress to the nation, undermining the very principles that HRDC was supposed to defend.
The case against Trapence is clear: he has abdicated his moral duty, compromised his organization’s integrity, and failed the people he was supposed to serve.
Malawi needs a genuine human rights movement—one that is independent, courageous, and unwavering in its commitment to justice.
HRDC, under Trapence’s leadership, has shown that it is neither.
As such, disbanding HRDC and rebuilding a new, truly independent human rights coalition may be the only way forward for Malawi, ensuring that the fight for justice is not hijacked by political sympathizers masquerading as defenders of the oppressed.
Trapence’s leadership has been marked by silence in the face of brutality, hypocrisy in the pursuit of political convenience, and a profound failure to uphold the core values of human rights.
His tenure not only failed the cause but actively contributed to MCP’s slide into authoritarianism.
The organization he led has become a shadow of its former self—a political tool rather than a defender of justice.
Malawi deserves better, and it is time to recognize that the mistakes of the past must not be repeated.
The country needs a genuine, fearless, and independent human rights movement that will stand up for the oppressed, challenge injustice, and uphold the dignity of all its citizens.
Trapence’s era, unfortunately, symbolizes a missed opportunity and a betrayal of the very principles he claimed to champion.
Feedback : 0992082424
Email: jonesgadama@gmail.com
