The hard truth is that Malawi has witnessed a notably peaceful campaign period, a commendable feat that deserves recognition from all corners of society.
The Malawi Electoral Commission (MEC), political parties, and electoral stakeholders have collectively championed the call for peace since the official launch of the campaign season.
This unified stance against violence and hooliganism has largely been respected, with no significant incidents of political unrest recorded—save for the unfortunate episode involving Chithyola Banda.
Yet even in this isolated case, law enforcement’s response remains disappointingly lackluster, exposing glaring deficiencies within our police force.
The failure to arrest those responsible for disrupting rallies or attacking Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) supporters in Dowa signals a troubling trend of unprofessionalism and possibly political bias within our security apparatus.
The hard truth is that while the campaign period’s overall calm is a positive development, the lax enforcement of law and order threatens to undermine the very peace we celebrate.
The hard truth is also that the political landscape currently favors Professor Arthur Peter Mutharika more than any other candidate.
Despite the storms swirling around him, Mutharika has exhibited a level of political maturity that is sorely missing in his opponents.
Where others choose to engage in reckless mudslinging, he remains focused on articulating his vision and agenda for Malawi’s future. This restraint and clarity have earned him praise from seasoned leadership and political analysts alike, who see in him the steady hand Malawi desperately needs.
The hard truth, then, is that the voters are not only observing the campaign messages but are also weighing the character and composure of those seeking their mandate.
It is in this light that the conduct of UTM’s presidential candidate Dalitso Kabambe and UDF’s Atupele Muluzi demands harsh scrutiny and condemnation.
The hard truth is that these two opposition figures have failed Malawi by neglecting to present clear, tangible plans for the country’s progress.
Instead of offering solutions, they have devoted their energies to incessantly attacking Professor Mutharika—an act that is both immature and politically irresponsible.
Their relentless focus on tearing down the DPP candidate rather than building up Malawi’s future is a betrayal of the electorate’s trust.
The hard truth is that Kabambe and Muluzi’s strategy amounts to nothing more than political noise, distracting voters from substantive debates about economic recovery, governance, and social development.
Moreover, the hard truth is that this fixation on attacking a common opponent—whom they collectively seek to unseat—is not only counterproductive but also hypocritical.
Both Kabambe and Muluzi are chasing the same political prize, yet instead of presenting themselves as credible alternatives, they resort to personal attacks and baseless accusations. Their behavior smacks of desperation and a lack of coherent policy direction.
The hard truth is that Malawi deserves leaders who engage in robust but respectful discourse, not candidates who resort to cheap political theatrics that erode public confidence in the democratic process.
It is essential to understand that political maturity entails more than just refraining from violence; it requires the courage to stand by one’s ideas and to communicate a compelling vision for the nation.
The hard truth is that Professor Mutharika embodies this virtue, and it is no coincidence that many Malawians and political observers regard him as the leader Malawi needs at this critical juncture.
His refusal to be dragged into petty squabbles underscores a confidence grounded in experience and a genuine commitment to national unity and development.
Furthermore, the hard truth is that the peaceful campaign environment we currently enjoy was only made possible by the proactive measures of the MEC and the cooperation of political parties.
This collective effort must not be overshadowed by the irresponsible actions of a few individuals or the unprofessional conduct of the police.
The hard truth is that maintaining peace requires vigilance, accountability, and an unwavering commitment to democratic principles from all stakeholders.
Let us not forget that elections are not merely contests of personality but processes that shape the future of our nation.
The hard truth is that Malawi stands at a crossroads. The electorate is watching not just who can shout the loudest but who can offer the most credible and mature leadership. The political landscape favors Professor Arthur Peter Mutharika because he has demonstrated the qualities of a leader who can unite and guide Malawi forward.
The hard truth is that Dalitso Kabambe and Atupele Muluzi must rise above petty attacks and present Malawi with the vision and policies that the people deserve. Until then, their political posturing will remain a disservice to the very citizens they seek to represent.
The hard truth is that Malawi’s future depends on leaders who prioritize peace, substance, and national progress over personal vendettas and empty rhetoric.
It is a truth every Malawian must confront as we approach the decisive moment of choice at the polls.
Feedback:0992082424
Email: jonesgadama@gmail.com
