The hard truth is that the Human Rights Defenders Coalition (HRDC), which claims to champion the rights and freedoms of Malawians, has increasingly demonstrated an allegiance not to the people it purports to serve, but to the Malawi Congress Party (MCP).
This reality has become so glaring that the question is no longer if the HRDC should continue operating under its current guise, but whether it should be deregistered or at the very least rebranded to reflect its apparent political affiliations.
The HRDC’s recent actions, particularly in relation to the Amaryllis Hotel controversy, are a case in point that exposes the organization’s failure to uphold its mandate as an independent human rights watchdog and instead reveals a disturbing pattern of political partisanship.
The hard truth is that HRDC’s recent 21-day ultimatum to President Peter Mutharika to dismiss officials implicated in the questionable sale of Amaryllis Hotel is a move that blatantly disregards established channels of dialogue and undermines the very governance process the coalition claims to protect.
President Mutharika has an open-door policy, encouraging all stakeholders, including civil society organizations, to approach him directly with their concerns for discussion and resolution.
Yet, HRDC bypassed this avenue altogether, choosing instead to issue a public ultimatum without any prior engagement.
This approach is neither constructive nor reflective of a genuine human rights defender’s role; it is political posturing designed to score points against the government.
The hard truth is that this sudden outrage over the Amaryllis Hotel issue is not rooted in genuine concern for justice or transparency but is selective and politically motivated.
The controversy dates back to 2023, during the MCP’s previous tenure when the party held power.
Back then, public figures like Collen Zamba were reportedly involved, yet HRDC remained conspicuously silent. This silence speaks volumes about the organization’s true priorities.
If the HRDC were truly committed to defending the interests of all Malawians, it would have condemned irregularities irrespective of the ruling party.
Instead, it chose to protect the MCP’s interests by keeping quiet, revealing a double standard that erodes its credibility and integrity.
The hard truth is that during MCP’s rule under Lazerus Chakwera, HRDC was virtually dormant, despite numerous documented cases of human rights violations inflicted upon Malawians.
This inactivity suggests that the coalition’s commitment to human rights is conditional, only surfacing vocally when the MCP is out of power, and silence prevailing when the party is in government.
This pattern exposes HRDC as less of a genuine defender of the people’s rights and more of a political instrument wielded against the ruling party at any given time.
Such behavior discredits the very concept of an independent human rights coalition that is supposed to operate above partisan politics.
The hard truth is that President Mutharika’s return to power, hailed by many as a savior for Malawi’s troubled political landscape, has been met with an HRDC resurgence that appears more intent on obstructing progress than promoting accountability.
The coalition’s confrontational stance, issuing ultimatums and publicly attacking the government, contradicts the spirit of constructive engagement required for national development.
Rather than supporting efforts to rescue Malawi from its challenges, HRDC’s actions seem designed to derail progress, sow division, and fuel political instability.
This antagonistic posture undermines the coalition’s claim to be defenders of the Malawian people and instead aligns it with partisan interests.
The hard truth is that the Malawi Congress Party Defenders Coalition (MCPDC) might be a more honest name for HRDC, as its actions align more closely with the MCP’s political agenda than with the broader interests of Malawians.
The coalition’s selective activism, its silence during MCP’s governance, and its aggressive posture when MCP is out of power make it clear that it is not an impartial human rights organization.
This politicization of human rights advocacy is harmful not only to the credibility of the coalition but also to the broader civil society landscape in Malawi, which relies on genuine, nonpartisan actors to hold power accountable.
The hard truth is that true human rights defenders must be consistent, principled, and above political affiliations.
They must challenge abuses regardless of who is in power, work through dialogue and engagement, and prioritize the welfare of all citizens over party interests. HRDC’s failure to meet these standards calls into question its legitimacy and effectiveness.
It is time for Malawians, civil society, and the international community to reconsider the role and registration status of this coalition.
Either it must undergo a thorough rebranding that reflects its political alignment or face deregistration to make way for more credible, impartial human rights organizations.
The hard truth is that Malawi’s democracy and human rights landscape deserve better.
The repeated pattern of HRDC’s selective activism damages public trust and weakens the fight for genuine human rights protections.
The coalition’s actions have gone beyond advocacy into the realm of partisan politics, which risks polarizing the nation further.
For the sake of Malawi’s democratic future and the integrity of civil society, it is imperative that HRDC either reforms fundamentally or makes way for a new generation of human rights defenders who genuinely represent and protect all Malawians, not just a political party.
The time has come for a sober reflection on the role of the Human Rights Defenders Coalition in Malawi.
Its recent conduct exposes a betrayal of its foundational purpose and a troubling alignment with the Malawi Congress Party.
The hard truth is that this trend is detrimental to Malawi’s democratic health and must be addressed decisively. Whether through deregistration or rebranding, the status quo cannot be allowed to persist.
Malawi’s human rights defenders must be true defenders of the people — independent, consistent, and committed to justice for all, not just for a political faction masquerading as a coalition for human rights.
Feedback: +265992082424
Email: jonesgadama@gmail.com
