LILONGWE-(MaraviPost)-An anonymous lecturer at the Malawi School of Government (MSG) has raised serious concerns over the current management and operations of the institution.
The lecturer, who has served at MSG for over eight years, spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the claims.
According to the source, the current MSG management was appointed by the previous MCP administration and appears to be undermining government programs, including initiatives under President Arthur Peter Mutharika’s agenda.
The lecturer alleged that the Director General (DG) was appointed without following a competitive recruitment process, in contravention of the MSG Act.
It is believed that the DG’s appointment was influenced by her husband, a pastor with strong ties to the former “pastor president,” raising concerns about her impartiality.
The seven directors currently serving at MSG were reportedly chosen based on connections to the DG, the former SPC Zamba, and MCP leadership, rather than merit.
For instance, one Head of Department, an Assemblies of God pastor with an agricultural background, was appointed to lead the Business and Management Department despite lacking relevant qualifications.
The lecturer claims this director has a history of dishonesty and misleadingly represents himself as a “PhD Fellow,” although he has not completed such studies.
When MCP assumed power, several experienced and competent MSG staff members were removed, according to the source.
This was allegedly done through a controversial “Placement Exercise,” which the lecturer says was designed to eliminate individuals perceived as DPP sympathizers.
Positions were reportedly given to candidates aligned with the DG and MCP, even if they failed interviews or lacked qualifications, while qualified staff were ignored.
Among those displaced were the former Acting Executive Director, Mr. Sikelo, and his capable team, who had previously run the institution efficiently without government subvention.
Currently, MSG receives government funding but is described as “top-heavy,” with eight directors earning substantial salaries and benefits despite limited output.
Meanwhile, junior staff reportedly continue to face significant challenges, including low pay and minimal support.
The anonymous lecturer also noted that most of the government subvention is spent on vehicles, travel allowances, and other perks for the DG and directors.
While the DG claims credit for clearing pension arrears, the lecturer argues that these achievements were the work of previous management.
The source called for a comprehensive review of all MSG recruitments since the restructuring, including the Placement Exercise.
Financial and staffing audits, similar to those conducted at NEEF, were recommended to restore accountability.
The lecturer expressed concern that capable professionals were displaced for political reasons, while individuals brought in by the MCP administration continue to benefit.
The situation at MSG highlights the urgent need for corrective action to ensure that government training institutions serve national interests rather than partisan agendas.
