Opinion Politics

Who is protecting former finance Minister Simplex Chithyola Banda?

1 Min Read

By Sam Sotta

One by one, the big men have fallen.

Senior Cabinet ministers. Power brokers. Untouchables in the previous administration of Lazarus Chakwera and Malaqi Congress Party (MCP). Arrested. Charged. Paraded before cameras. Released on bail, yes — but processed all the same.

Yet in this storm, one name remains strangely untouched: Simplex Chithyola.

The former Minister of Finance walks free while his peers shuffle between courtrooms and lawyers’ offices. No arrest. No public charge. No police drama.

Coincidence?

Or protection?

Serious allegations are circulating in political circles — allegations that powerful figures in the current DPP establishment may have been demanding staggering sums of money from Chithyola in exchange for shielding him from arrest. We are talking about figures whispered to run into billions of kwacha.

If true, they would expose a protection racket operating at the highest levels of power.

Recently, Chithyola secured a court order stopping police from searching his Namuleri farm in Kasungu, where investigators reportedly wanted to inspect fertilizer bags allegedly stolen from NEEF. The search never happened.

Why?

If the law is moving decisively against others, why is it tiptoeing here?
Is this about lack of evidence — or abundance of influence?

And if money is indeed changing hands, how much buys freedom in today’s Malawi?

In politics, patterns matter.

When everyone else is being arrested except one man, that is not just a legal anomaly. It is a political statement.

Stay here. This story is not finished.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in the article are those of the author not necessarily of The Maravi Post or Editor

Maravi Post Author

Today’s Opinion · Op-Ed Columnists · Editorials · Op-Ed Contributors to the Maravi Post· The Maravi Post accepts opinion essays on any topic. Published pieces typically run from 400 to 1,200 words, but drafts of any length within the bounds of reason will be considered.